Hydroxyl Radicals Formation in Dielectric Barrier Discharge During Decomposition of Toluene
- 284 Downloads
- 14 Citations
Abstract
A method based on high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), has been developed to measure hydroxyl radical (·OH) in plasma reactors. The determination was performed indirectly by detecting the products of the reaction of ·OH with salicylic acid (SAL). The applicability, and effect of time, specific input energy (SIE), relative humidity (RH), catalyst were investigated. It was found that 3 h was the optimal trapping time; concentration of ·OH was (5.9–23.6) × 1013 radicals/cm3 at SIE range. The highest ·OH yield and toluene removal efficiency (η) were achieved with a RH of 20%. With MnO x , η was two times that without catalyst, while ·OH yield in gas stream was one-sixth that without catalyst. However, if summed with ·OH adsorbed on catalyst surface, the total ·OH yield was the same as without catalyst. Experiments performed with/without toluene allowed to determine the role of ·OH on decomposition of toluene in air plasma.
Keywords
Hydroxyl radical HPLC Salicylic acid DBD Toluene removalNotes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Doctoral Program of Higher Specialized Research Fund (20070561042); National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2006AA06A310), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50978103, No. 50708021), the Guangzhou University Xinmiao Project (No. gyf1-1001), and the Guangzhou University Scientific Research Startup Project (No. gyf1-1002). In addition, key laboratory of environmental protection and eco-remediation of Guangdong regular higher education institutions was gratefully acknowledged.
References
- 1.Oda T (2003) J Electrostat 57:293–311CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bach RD, Dmitrenko O (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:1474–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Jen JF, Leu MF, Yang TC (1998) J Chromatogr A 796:283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Freinbichler W, Bianchi L, Colivicchi MA, Ballini C, Tipton KF, Linert W, Corte LD (2008) J Inorg Biochem 102:1329–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Suh I, Zhang R (2002) Chem Phys Lett 363:454–462CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 6.Magne L, Pasquiers S, Simiand B (2007) J Phys D Appl Phys 40:3112–3127CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 7.Klamt A (1996) Chemosphere 32:717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Storch DG, Kushner MJ (1993) J Appl Phys 73:51–55CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 9.Miura Y, Ueda J, Ozawa T (1995) Inorg Chim Acta 234:169–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Heard DE (2006) Annu Rev Phys Chem 57:191–216CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 11.Magne L, Pasquiers S (2005) C R Phys 6:908–917CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bektas B, Özyürek M (2008) Talanta 77:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Campbell MJ, Hall BD, Sheppard JC, Utley PL, O’Brien RJ, Hard TM, George LA (1995) J Atmos Sci 52:3421–3427CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.Su ZZ, Ito K, Takashima K, Katsura S, Onda K, Mizuno A (2002) J Phys D Appl Phys 35:3192–3198CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rudolph R, Francke KP, Miessner H (2003) Plasmas Polym 8:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Guo YF, Liao XB, Ye DQ (2008) J Environ Sci 20:1429–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Guo YF, Ye DQ, Chen KF, He JC, Chen WL (2006) J Mol Catal A Chem 245:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Buxton GV, Greenstock CL, Helman WP (1988) J Phys Chem Ref Data 17:513–886ADSGoogle Scholar
- 19.Chang CY, Hsieh YH, Hsieh LL, Yao KS, Cheng TC (2009) J Hazard Mater 166:897–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kohno H, Berezin AA, Chang J-S, Tamura M, Yamamoto T, Shibuya A, Honda S (1998) IEEE Trans Ind Appl 34:953–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Futamura S, Zhang AH, Yamamoto T (1997) J Electrostat 42:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ono R, Oda T (2002) J Electrostat 55:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar