Dry Reforming of Methane with Carbon Dioxide Using Pulsed DC Arc Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure
- 581 Downloads
- 28 Citations
Abstract
Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 to produce syngas was investigated in a plasma reactor without catalysts at atmospheric pressure. The reactants passed through the plasma zone and reacted in milliseconds with high conversions and selectivity due to the localized high temperature. The results showed that both conversions and selectivity were higher when using a DC arc discharge than using a pulsed DC arc. Increasing the input energy density promoted the conversions of reactants. At an input power of 204 W, the conversions of CO2 and CH4 reached 99.3 and 99.6%, respectively, and the selectivity to products was almost 100%, where the molar ratio of CO2/CH4 was 1 with the reactants flow rate of 100 ml/min. Very little coke was formed during the course of reaction. Key parameters such as the pulse frequency, the input power and the total feed flow rate were studied to find the optimum operating condition.
Keywords
Dry reforming Methane Carbon dioxide Pulsed DC arc plasma SyngasNotes
Acknowledgments
Financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the grant of No. 20976091 and National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, Grant No. 2009AA044701) are acknowledged.
References
- 1.Skeer J, Wang Y (2006) Energy Policy 34:2251–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Fco E, Úbeda F, Berzosa A (2007) Energy Econ 29:710–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Feng H, Zhang H, Xu L (2007) Energy Sour 29:1269–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Edwards JH, Maitra AM (1995) Fuel Process Technol 42:269–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Wender I (1996) Fuel Process Technol 48:189–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Deminsky M, Jivotov V, Potapkin B, Rusanov V (2002) Pure Appl Chem 74:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Zhang YP, Li Y, Wang Y, Liu CJ, Eliasson B (2003) Fuel Process Technol 83:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Huang H, Tang L (2007) Energy Convers Manage 48:1331–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Jiang T, Li Y, Liu CJ, Xu GH, Eliasson B, Xue BZ (2007) Catal Today 72:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Chen HW, Wang CY, Yu CH, Tseng LT, Liao PH (2004) Catal Today 97:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Jóźwiak WK, Nowosielska M, Rynkowski J (2005) Appl Catal. A 280:233–244Google Scholar
- 12.Malik MA, Jiang XZ (1999) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 19:505–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Huang AM, Xia GG, Wang JY et al (2000) J Catal 189:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cheng DG, Zhu XZ, Ben YH, He F, Cui L, Liu CJ (2006) Catal Today 115:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ghorbanzadeha AM, Modarresi HJ (2007) Appl Phys 101:1–10Google Scholar
- 16.Patino P, Pérez Y, Caetano M (2005) Fuel 84:2008–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Tsai CH, Huang KL, Hsieh LT (2005) Ind Eng Chem Res 44:6566–6571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Liu CJ, Xue BZ, Eliasson B, He F, Li Y, Xu GH (2001) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 21:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Song HK, Lee H, Choi JW, Na BK (2004) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 24:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wang Q, Yan BH, Jin Y, Cheng Y (2009) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 29:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Chun YN, Song HO (2006) Environ Eng Sci 23:1017–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Rueangjitt N, Akarawitoo C, Sreethawong T, Chavadej S (2007) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 27:559–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Rueangjitt N, Sreethawong T, Chavadej S (2008) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 28:49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Bo Z, Yan JH, Li XD, Chi Y, Cen K (2008) Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:5545–5553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Chun YN, Song HO (2008) Energy Sour 30:1202–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Song HK, Choi JW, Yue SH, Lee H, Na BK (2004) Catal Today 89:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Tao XM, Qi FW, Yin YX, Dai XY (2008) Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:1262–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Kim SC, Chun YN (2008) Renew Energy 33:1564–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Nozaki T, Hiroyuki T, Okazaki K (2006) Energy Fuel 20:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar