Advertisement

Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 68, Issue 6, pp 605–617 | Cite as

Spiritual Dryness and Celibacy in Catholic Priests – Discernment of Ongoing Spiritual Journeys from Relational and Psychosexual Immaturities

  • Klaus Baumann
  • Eckhard Frick
  • Christoph Jacobs
  • Arndt BüssingEmail author
Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

The celibacy of Roman Catholic priests, in contrast to a single lifestyle, implies an existential choice for spiritual reasons as a conscious motivation. Nevertheless, several of them struggle with celibacy life style and some experience phases of spiritual dryness. So far it is unclear which role priestly celibacy may play in this context. We therefore intended to investigate whether and how celibacy on the one hand and supportive relations to other persons and feelings of loneliness on the other hand are connected to the experience of spiritual dryness among priests. As part of the German Pastoral Ministry Study, we analyzed data sets of 2531 priests. The results at first hand confirmed a correlation of spiritual dryness with a low commitment to celibacy and loneliness. Regression analyses revealed problems with sexuality and loneliness as an inability to be alone are relevant indicators of spiritual dryness. Our results point to two important concomitant mental conditions in a considerable number of cases: to continuous psychosexual problems and immaturities on one hand and to a basic incapacity to be alone, pointing to a serious structural deficit in the psychic life of some of our participants. Our study finally is a call to address these problems adequately, first of all for the mental health and spiritual truth of these persons, secondly also in the interest of all of those who priests are called to minister.

Keywords

Catholic priests Celibacy Spiritual dryness Psychosexual maturity Loneliness 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

This study was an investigator-initiated trial without any influence by church authorities. All authors are faculty members of universities; three of the authors are Catholic priests (EF, KB, CJ) working at universities as researchers. The authors do not have any financial or other competing interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All individuals who participated in this anonymously conducted cross-sectional study were informed about the purpose of the study, assured of confidentiality and their right to withdraw their participation at any time, and asked to provide informed consent by signing a form included with but separate from the provided questionnaires. None of the participants received any form of incentive.

References

  1. Baumann, K., Büssing, A., Frick, E., Jacobs, C., & Weig, W. (2017a). Zwischen Spirit und Stress. Die Seelsorgenden in den deutschen Diözesen [Between spirit and stress: Pastoral workers in German dioceses]. Würzburg, Germany: Echter Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Baumann, K., Jacobs, C., Frick, E., & Büssing, A. (2017b). Commitment to celibacy in German Catholic priests: Its relation to religious practices, psychosomatic health and psychosocial resources. Journal of Religious Health, 56, 649–668.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0313-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Büssing, A., Günther, A., Baumann, K., Frick, E., & Jacobs, C. (2013). Spiritual dryness as a measure of a specific spiritual crisis in Catholic priests: Associations with symptoms of burnout and distress. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/246797.Google Scholar
  4. Büssing, A., Frick, E., Jacobs, C., & Baumann, K. (2016). Spiritual dryness in non-ordained Catholic pastoral workers. Religions, 7, 141.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rel7120141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Büssing, A., Baumann, K., Jacobs, C., & Frick, E. (2017). Spiritual dryness in Catholic priests: Internal resources as possible buffers. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9, 46–55.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Büssing, A., Baiocco, F., & Baumann, K. (2018). Spiritual dryness in Catholic lay persons working as volunteers is related to reduced life satisfaction rather than to indicators of spirituality. Pastoral Psychology, 67, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-017-0798-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daeschler, R. (1937). Aridité. In M. Viller, F. Cavallera, J. de Guibert, A. Rayaz, A. Derville, & A. Solignac (Eds.), Dictionnaire de Spiritualité Ascétique et Mystique [Dictionary of ascetic and mystical spirituality] (Vol. 1, pp. 845–855). Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personal Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fydrich, F., Sommer, G., Tydecks, S., & Brähler, E. (2009). Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14) [questionnaire on social support (F-SozU): Standardization of the short form (K-14)]. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 18, 43–48.Google Scholar
  10. Joseph, E., Corveleyn, J., Luyten, P., & de Witte, H. (2010). Does commitment to celibacy lead to burnout or enhance engagement? A study among the Indian Catholic clergy. European Journal of Mental Health, 5, 187–204.  https://doi.org/10.1556/EJMH.5.2010.2.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rossetti, S. J. (2011). Why priests are happy: A study of the psychological and spiritual health of priests. Notre Dame: Ave Maria Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rulla, L. M., Ridick, J., & Imoda, F. (1976). Entering and leaving vocation: Intrapsychic dynamics. Rome: Gregorian University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, D., Cutrona, C. E., Rose, J., & Yurko, K. (1984). Social and emotional loneliness: An examination of Weiss’s typology of loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1313–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schwab, R. (1997). Einsamkeit. Grundlagen für die klinisch-psychologische Diagnostik und intervention [Lonliness: Fundamentals of clinical-psychological diagnosis and intervention]. Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  15. Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Underwood, L. G. (2011). The daily spiritual experience scale: Overview and results. Religions, 2, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Waelder, R. (1936). The principle of multiple function: Observations on over-determination. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 5, 45–62 (reprint: The Psychoanalytic Quarterly (2007), 76, 75–92).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Winnicott, D. W. (1958). The capacity to be alone. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39, 416–420.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Caritas Science and Christian Social Work, Faculty of TheologyAlbert-Ludwig UniversityFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Munich School of Philosophy & Professorship of Spiritual CareUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Pastoral Psychology and Sociology, Faculty of Theology PaderbornPaderbornGermany
  4. 4.Professorship Quality of Life, Spirituality and Coping, Institute for Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke UniversityHerdeckeGermany

Personalised recommendations