Advertisement

Biopolitics: Look in the Lost and Found for Peace of Mind

  • Archie SmithJr
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

This is a report on biopolitics, current cognitions (quality of mind), and our fundamental human nature. Biopolitics means biology and politics considered together. It promises something unlimited. However, biopolitics alone can take us only so far. Today, we may have lost a certain discerning wisdom about the natural environment and integrated fabric that melds all lives, a sacred unity. Biopolitics may be too narrow a frame for human living and ecological survival. Something is missing when there is talk about “unworthy” cultures and nations. Typically, in Western and capitalist societies a certain truncated and rational view of our fundamental human nature is promoted. Americans, for example, are told by leading authorities that we can do anything we put our minds to. But, toward which ends? The author argues that we need to rethink the idea that because something appears to have changed or is modern, recent, or new it is somehow better than what is considered old or ancient. If biopolitics promises an unlimited horizon for certain values and ends, strategies, and ways of knowing, then we need a wider conversation that includes “Lucy” (or the people of long ago) and our fundamental human nature. The ancient quest for remembrance and significance is in the new; the new has roots in what is prior. Time past, then, is partially contained in times present and future. A wider and deeper assessment that leads to a conscious and wise grasp of our current situation is required. The author contends that this is relevant to a pastoral theology that truly cares. Therefore, attempts to include aspects of the past and widen the lens may not be popular, but they may lead to a wise integration of ancient and emerging present concerns and to deeper questions.

Keywords

Ancestors Ancient Biopolitics Cognitive deviants Fundamental human nature Minority report Numinous Peace of mind Public intellectuals Quality of mind Cognitive mapping Reciprocal morality Unworthy cultures 

Notes

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. L. (1969). A rumor of angels: Modern society and the rediscovery of the supernatural. New York: Doubleday & Co..Google Scholar
  4. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  5. Harding, V. (1990). Hope and history. New York: Maryknoll.Google Scholar
  6. Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lemke, T., Casper, M. T., Moore, L. J. (2011). Bio-Politics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Liderbach, D (1989). The Numinous Universe. New York/Mahwash: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  9. Pitzele, P. (1961). Our fathers’ wells: A personal encounter with the myths of genesis. San Francisco: HarperSan Francisco.Google Scholar
  10. Smith Jr, A. (1981). Religion and mental health among blacks. Journal of Religion and Health, 20(4), 264–287.Google Scholar
  11. Smith Jr, A., & Riedel-Pfaefflin, U. (2002), Complexity and simplicity in pastoral care: The case of forgiveness. American Journal of Pastoral Counseling, 5(3/4), 295–316. Binghamton: The Haworth Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Smith Jr, A., & Riedel-Pfaefflin, U. (2004). Death and the maiden: The complexity of trauma and ways of healing. In Siblings by choice: Race, gender, and violence. St. Louis: Chalice Press.Google Scholar
  13. Turner, M. D. (2011). The god we seek: Portraits of god in the old testament. St Louis: Chalice Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Archie SmithJr
    • 1
  1. 1.El CerritoUSA

Personalised recommendations