Advertisement

Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 373–387 | Cite as

The Power of Ambivalence: Using Ambivalence as a Healing Resource for Asian Women in the Confucian Context

  • Insook Lee
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the power of “cultivated ambivalence” in the task of constructing Confucian feminism. Such resources of cultivated and radical ambivalence create a “third space” in which Asian women can be true both to themselves and to their ambivalence. In this space, they would be empowered to “talk back” to both Confucian traditions and Western liberal feminism.

Keywords

Ambivalence Confucianism Feminism Modernization Asian women Mental health 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Informed Consent

Informed Consent was obtained from the participant included in the case study.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bednarowski, M. F. (1999). The religious imagination of American women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bleuler, E. (1950). Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias (J. Zinkin, Trans. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boisen, A. T. (1962). The Exploration of the Inner World. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  5. Corradi, R. B. (2013). Ambivalence: Its development, mastery, and role in psychopathology. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 77(1), 41–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The Importance of what we care about. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankfurt, H. (1999). The faintest passion. In H. Frankfurt (Ed.), Necessity, volition, and love (pp. 95-107). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1953). Totem and taboo. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 57–145). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1913.).Google Scholar
  9. Guisso, R. W. L., & Johannessen, S. (Eds.). (1981). Women in China: Current directions in historical scholarship. Youngstown: Philo Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gunnarsson, L. (2014). In dense of ambivalence and alienation. Ethic Theory Moral Practice, 17, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang, N. (2004). Who/what is Asian?: A postcolonial theological reading of Orientalism and Neo-Orientalism. In C. Keller, M. Nausner, & M. Rivera (Eds.), Postcolonial theologies: Divinity and empire (pp. 100–117). St. Louis: Chalice Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kernberg, O. F. (1985). Neurosis, psychosis, and the borderline states. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry/IV (pp. 621–630). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  13. Klein, M. (1975). The psychoanalysis of children (A. Strachey, Trans. New York: Delacorte Press/Seymour Lawrence.Google Scholar
  14. Li, C. (2000). The Sage and the second sex: Confucianism, ethic, and gender. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  15. Plaskow, J. (1990). Standing again at Sinai: Judaism from a feminist perspective. New York: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
  16. Svolva, D. (2011). Swindell, Frankfurt, and ambivalence. Philosophical Explorations, 14(2), 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Swindell, J. S. (2010). Ambivalence. Philosophical Explorations, 13(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Woo, T. (1999). Confucianism and feminism. In A. Sharma & K. K. Young (Eds.), Feminism and world religions (pp. 110–147). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York Theological SeminaryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations