Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 303–313 | Cite as

Evaluating Pastoral Effectiveness: To Measure or Not to Measure

  • Robert B. McKennaEmail author
  • Katrina Eckard


Interviews were conducted with 101 senior pastoral leaders from a variety of denominations in order to identify the ways in which pastors and those in authority positions over senior pastoral leaders measure their own effectiveness. The findings of these interviews revealed 23 measures of effectiveness in five categories, including leader outcomes, congregational outcomes, and objective outcomes. Based on the effectiveness taxonomy described in the current study, a process is suggested for a preliminary discussion among church leadership teams, congregational boards, and denominations to identify their primary mission, constituencies served, and related effectiveness priorities.


Pastoral development Pastoral effectiveness Church governance Church leadership Church effectiveness 


  1. Kling, F. R. (1958). A study of testing as related to the ministry. Religious Education, 53, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Kuhne, G. W., & Donaldson, J. F. (1995). Balancing ministry and management: An exploratory study of pastoral work activities. Review of Religious Research, 37, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lichtman, S. L., & Malony, H. N. (1990). Effective ministerial style as perceived by denominational leadership. Pastoral Psychology, 38, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Malony, H. N. (1984). Ministerial effectiveness: A review of recent research. Pastoral Psychology, 33, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McCall, M. W., Lombardo, M. M., & Morrison, A. M. (1988). The lessons of experience: How successful executives develop on the job. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  7. McKenna, R. B., Boyd, T. N., & Yost, P. R. (2007a). Learning agility in clergy: Understanding the personal strategies and situational factors that enable pastors to learn from experience. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 35, 190–201.Google Scholar
  8. McKenna, R. B., Yost, P. R., & Boyd, T. N. (2007b). Leadership development and clergy understanding: The events and lessons that shape pastoral leaders. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 35(3), 179–189.Google Scholar
  9. Meek, K. R., McMinn, M. R., Brower, C. M., Burnett, T. D., McRay, B. W., Ramey, M. L., et al. (2003). Maintaining personal resiliency: Lessons learned from evangelical protestant clergy. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 339–347.Google Scholar
  10. Nauss, A. (1983). Seven profiles of effective ministers. Review of Religious Research, 24, 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nauss, A. (1989). Leadership styles of effective ministry. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 17, 59–67.Google Scholar
  12. Nauss, A. (1994). Ministerial effectiveness in ten functions. Review of Religious Research, 36, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nauss, A. (1995). The pastor as leader: Shepherd, rancher, or . . .? Journal of Psychology and Theology, 23, 115–128.Google Scholar
  14. Nauta, R. (1988). Task performance and attributional biases in the ministry. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Senske, K. (2004). Pastor: CEO and role model. Clergy Journal, 80(8), 3–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Industrial/Organizational PsychologySeattle Pacific UniversitySeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial/Organizational PsychologySeattle Pacific UniversitySeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations