Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 73–78 | Cite as

A Commentary on Religious Conflicts and a Call for a Focus on the Best the Traditions have to Offer

Article

Abstract

The casual observer of the religious traditions cannot get a very good impression when attending to the daily news. One might easily conclude that much of the troubles in the world today are caused by religious conflicts and the inability of the religious communities to get along. Sometimes, it appears that the planet would be better off without religion at all. Tragically, most of the general population are perhaps religious illiterates who focus on religious differences and conflicts rather than similarities and what they offer at their best. While there are a number of efforts by scholars and others to improve interfaith respect and conversation, our world would be better off if we focused on the best the religious traditions have to offer rather than the worst as well as respecting and being open to traditions other than our own. This could be accomplished if religious education and training were greatly altered.

Keywords

Religious conflicts Religious education Psychology Interfaith 

References

  1. Armstrong, K. (1993). A history of God: The 4,000 year quest of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York: Gramercy.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, K. (2000). The battle for God: Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, K. (2006). The great transformation: The beginning of our religious traditions. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  4. Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Peterson, R. (1986). Everyone is right: A new look at comparative religion and its relation to science. Marina del Ray, CA: DeVorss.Google Scholar
  6. Smith, H. (1991). The world’s religions: Our great wisdom traditions. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentSanta Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA

Personalised recommendations