Advertisement

Oxidation of Metals

, Volume 90, Issue 1–2, pp 187–202 | Cite as

Influence of Co Content on the High-Temperature Oxidation Performance of (Ni,Co)–25Cr–0.4C–6Ta Cast Alloys

  • Patrice Berthod
  • Zohra Himeur
Original Paper

Abstract

Tantalum carbide (TaC) is a classical strengthening precipitate phase, like chromium carbides, in equi-axed cast Cr-rich cobalt-based alloys. When the former carbides are of a eutectic nature and in quantity high enough, they may be of great interest for applications at elevated temperature, due to their favorable script-like morphology and their high stability at high temperature. Unfortunately, they cannot be so easily obtained in Cr-rich nickel-based alloys of similar composition. This can be resolved by adding cobalt in substitution to nickel, but such chemical modification may change the high temperature oxidation behavior in the wrong direction. In this work, several alloys, all containing 25% Cr, 0.4% C, and 6% Ta (wt%), were fabricated and studied at 1127 °C. It appears that the 27 wt% Co content is high enough to allow obtaining primary carbides, which are essentially TaC. The alloys rich enough in Co containing only tantalum carbides are clearly disadvantaged in terms of oxidation resistance at high temperature by the high Co content and by the absence of interdendritic chromium carbides known to act as useful Cr reservoirs. Among the six studied alloys, these are the three ones for which Co/Ni > 1 that demonstrated starts of catastrophic oxidation before 24 h of exposure to air.

Keywords

Nickel-based alloys Cobalt-based alloys Chromium carbides Tantalum carbides High temperature oxidation Thermodynamic calculations 

References

  1. 1.
    C. T. Sims and W. C. Hagel, The Superalloys, (Wiley, New York, 1972).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. F. Bradley, Superalloys: A Technical Guide, (ASM International, Metals Park, 1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Morrow, W. P. Danesi and D. L. Sponseller, Cobalt 4, 1973 (93).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. L. Ammon, L. R. Eisenstatt and G. O. Yatsko, Journal of Engineering for Power 103, (2), 1981 (331).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Reuchet and L. Remy, Metallurgical Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 14, (1), 1983 (141).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Berthod, Advanced Materials Letters 8, (8), 2017 (866).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Berthod, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, article ID 4145369,  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4145369 (2017).
  8. 8.
    M. J. Donachie and S. J. Donachie, Superalloys: A Technical Guide, 2nd ed, (ASM International, Materials Park, 2002).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Young, High Temperature Oxidation and Corrosion of Metals, (Elsevier Corrosion Series, Amsterdam, 2008).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Berthod, S. Michon, L. Aranda, S. Mathieu and J. C. Gachon, Calphad 27, 2003 (353).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Berthod, Y. Hamini, L. Aranda and L. Héricher, Calphad 31, 2007 (351).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Berthod, L. Aranda, C. Vébert and S. Michon, Calphad 28, 2004 (159).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z. Himeur, Report of Master Trainee Period, University of Lorraine (Nancy, France), 2017.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thermo-Calc version N: “Foundation for Computational Thermodynamics” Stockholm, Sweden, Copyright (1993, 2000). www.thermocalc.com.
  15. 15.
    SSOL database, SGTE Solutions Database, Scientific Group Thermodata Europe, Bo Sundman, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department CP2S, Faculty of Science and Technologies, Institut Jean Lamour (UMR CNRS 7198)University of LorraineVandoeuvre-lès-NancyFrance

Personalised recommendations