Effects of Temperature and Straining on the Oxidation Behavior of Electrical Steels
- 149 Downloads
- 13 Citations
Abstract
The effect of Si content (in the range of 0.01–1.91 wt%) on scale formation of electrical steels in dry air at temperatures ranging from 850 to 1200 °C was investigated. The effect of applied tensile strain on oxidation behavior was also explored. A thermo-mechanical simulator (Gleeble machine) was employed to conduct the oxidation tests at different load conditions. The experimental results showed that at 1000 °C the oxidation rate decreased with increasing Si content in the steel. The formation of an inner scale, mainly consisting of amorphous silica, was responsible for the improved oxidation resistance. However, a substantial increase in oxidation rate due to the formation of molten eutectic fayalite (Fe2SiO4) was observed when the temperature was raised to 1200 °C. Under straining conditions at a very short oxidation time, the inner scale structure was slightly modified though the scale thickness remained almost unchanged for the steel containing 1.91 wt% Si.
Keywords
Si-containing steel Thermo-mechanical simulator Oxidation Silica FayaliteReferences
- 1.T. Fukagawa, H. Okada, and Y. Maehara, Iron and Steel Institute of Japan International 34, 906 (1994).Google Scholar
- 2.H. Okada, T. Fukagawa, H. Ishihara, A. Okamoto, M. Azuma, and Y. Matsuda, Tetsu-to-Hagane 80, 849 (1994).Google Scholar
- 3.I. Svedung and N. G. Vannerberg, Corroion Science 14, 391 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.C. W. Tuck, in Proceedings of the First International Congress of Metallic Corrosion, London, 1961, p. 221.Google Scholar
- 5.T. Adachi and G. H. Meier, Oxidation of Metals 27, 347 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Y. L. Yang, C. H. Yang, S. L. Lin, C. H. Chen, and W. T. Tsai, Materials Chemistry and Physics 112, 566 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.K. Kusabiraki, R. Watanabe, T. Ikehata, M. Takeda, T. Onishi, and X. Guo, Iron and Steel Institute of Japan International 47, 1329 (2007).Google Scholar
- 8.L. Suarez, J. Schneider, and Y. Houbaert, Defect and Diffusion Forum 273–276, 655 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.L. Suarez, J. Schneider, and Y. Houbaert, Defect and Diffusion Forum 273–276, 661 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.M. Diéz-Ercilla, T. Ros-Yáñez, R. Petrov, Y. Houbaert, and R. Colás, Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology 39, 295 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.J. Païdassi, Acta Metallurgica 6, 184 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.R. D. Shaw and R. Rolls, Corrosion Science 14, 443 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.R. Y. Chen and W. Y. D. Yuen, Oxidation of Metals 57, 53 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.C. W. Tuck, Corrosion Science 5, 631 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.A. Atkinson and J. W. Gardner, Corrosion Science 21, 49 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.P. Wu, G. Eriksson, A. D. Pelton, and M. Blander, Iron and Steel Institute of Japan International 33, 26 (1993).Google Scholar
- 17.S. Taniguchi, K. Yamamoto, D. Megumi, and T. Shibata, Materials Science and Engineering A 308, 250 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.M. Okita, A. Nagai, I. Sinagawa, and K. Horinouchi, in Current Advances in Materials and Processes: Report of the ISIJ Meeting, Vol. 2 (1989), p. 1509.Google Scholar