Optical and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 41, Issue 11–13, pp 895–902 | Cite as

Two-dimensional dynamic simulations of DFB lasers and MOPAs

Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the complex lateral structure of Distributed Feedback lasers (DFB) and Master Oscillator Power Amplifiers (MOPAs), one-dimensional methods like the classical Transfer Matrix Method (TMM) are not suitable for simulating the optical wave in these devices. Therefore, we applied Trigonometric Finite Wave Elements (TFWE) that generalize the TMM in two or three dimensions. By coupling the dynamic wave equation with simplified temperature and drift-diffusion models, we can simulate the dynamic behavior of DFB lasers and MOPAs. Furthermore, by Fourier transformation, we can calculate the modes of the laser cavity and the corresponding wavelengths. By this approach, the influence of injection current and temperature on the resulting modes and output power can be analyzed in detail.

Keywords

DFB Laser MOPA Finite elements Trigonometric finite wave elements Helmholtz equation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buus J., Amann M.-C., Blumenthal D.J.: Tunable Laser Diodes and Related Optical Sources. Wiley, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carroll J.E., Whiteaway J., Plumb D.: Distributed Feedback Semiconductor Lasers. SPIE Press, USA (1998)Google Scholar
  3. Coldren L.A., Corzine S.W.: Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits. Wiley, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  4. Heubeck B., Pflaum C., Steinle G.: New finite elements for large-scale simulation of optical waves. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31(2), 1063–1081 (2008)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Heubeck B., Pflaum C.: Time-dynamic simulations of DFB lasers in 2D. Proceedings of SPIE 7211, 721116 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heubeck B., Pflaum C.: Convergence analysis of non-conforming trigonometric finite wave elements. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234(6), 1920–1929 (2010)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Piprek J.: Optoelectronic Devices: Advanced Simulation and Analysis, pp. 87–119. Springer, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Spreemann M., Lichtner M., Radziunas M., Bandelow U., Wenzel H.: Measurement and Simulation of Distributed-Feedback Tapered Master-Oscillators Power-Amplifiers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 45(6), 609–616 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Steinle, G.: Neuartige monolithische InAlGaAsN Vertikallaserdioden: langwellige Emission bei 1.3 μm, Monitordiodenintegration, Modellierung. PhD thesis, University of Ulm (2002)Google Scholar
  10. Tsang W.T.: The effects of lateral current spreading, carrier out-diffusion, and optical mode losses on the threshold current density of GaAs-Alχ Ga1-χ As stripe-geometry DH lasers. J. Appl. Phys. 49(3), 1031–1044 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Wenzel H., Dallmer M., Erbert G.: Thermal lensing in high-power ridge-waveguide lasers. J. Opt. Quant. Electron. 40(5–6), 379–384 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s11082-007-9176-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Witzigman B., Oyafuso F., Hess K.: Quasi-three-dimensional simulation of carrier dynamics in quantum well DFB lasers. IEE Proc. Optoelectronics 145(6), 339–343 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT)University of Erlangen-NürnbergBavariaGermany
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Erlangen-NürnbergBavariaGermany

Personalised recommendations