Optical and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 193–212 | Cite as

Tunable subnanosecond laser pulse generation using an active mirror concept

  • Margarita A. Deneva
  • Pepa I. Uzunova
  • Marin N. Nenchev
Article

Abstract

We report (theory, experimental check) an improved approach for generation of a tunable, subnanosecond pulse (0.1–0.4 ns), based on a single pulsation (“spike”) separation from the transient oscillations in a dye laser with active mirror (AMIR). A pumping by 20–50 ns pulses from Q-switched Nd:YAG laser is considered. The separation is in original, two-spectral selective channels cavity, where the forced by AMIR quenched generation at one of the wavelength stops initially started spiking generation at the other wavelength after the first spike development. The AMIR quickly starts the quenching generation at a precisely controlled moment and with necessary intensity thus assuring the desired separation. An advantage is a high reproducibility of the separation for high (~250%) pump power fluctuations combined with tuning in large range (~20 nm). To obtain such an operation we form ~1 ns leading front pump pulse by electrooptical temporal cutting of the input pump pulse and use an optical delay line. This increases also a few times the power in the separated spike (to be ~100 kW). Our approach widens the combinations of lasers for effective applications of spike separation technique (dye lasers excited by Q-switched solid-state or Cu-vapor lasers).

Keywords

Subnanosecond laser generation Tunable laser Transient oscillations Two-spectral selective channels cavity Interference wedge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreoni A., Benetti P., Sacchi C.A. (1975). Subnanosecond pulses from a single-cavity dye laser. Appl. Phys. 7: 61 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Braverman L. (1975). Controlled passive Q switch for the N2– laser–pumped dye. Appl. Phys. Lett. 27: 603 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpintero, G., Lamela, H.: Non linear dynamics of modulated laser diodes, Recent Res. Quantum Electronics, Transworld Research Network T.C. 36/248 (1), Trivandrum-8, India, 2, 55-83, 2000Google Scholar
  4. Cubeddu R., Polloni R., Sacchi C.A. (1977). A simple and reliable short–pulse dye laser. Appl. Phys. 13: 109 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Delev A., Deneva M., Nenchev M., Stoykova E., Slavov D. (2001). Tunable subnanosecond pulse generation in a dye laser using overlaped pump pulses. Rev. Sci. Imtrum. 72: 1640 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Deneva M., Slavov D., Stoykova E., Nenchev M. (1997). Improved self-injection locking method for spectral control of dye and Ti3+:Al2O3 lasers using two-step pulse pumping. Opt. Commun. 139: 287 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Ganniel U., Hardy A. (1976). Narrow–band tunable, subnanosecond pulse generation in injection locked dye laser system. Opti. Commun. 19: 1914 Google Scholar
  8. Gorris-Nveux M., Nenchev M., Barbe R., Keller J.C. (1995). A Two-wavelength passively self-injection locked, CW Ti3+ : Al2O3 laser. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 31: 1253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lei, Z., Fucheng, L.: Pulse shortening of a copper bromide laser by quenching of resonator transient. Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 2329 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. Lin C. (1975). Studies of relaxation oscillations in organic dye lasers. IEEE J. Quantum. Electron. QE-11: 602 ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin C., Shank C.V. (1975). Subnanosecond tunable dye laser pulse generation by controlled resonator transient. Appl. Phys. Lett. 26: 389 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Louyer Y., Wallerand J.P., Himbert M., Deneva M., Nenchev M. (2003). Two-wavelength, passive self-injection controlled operation of diode-pumped CW YB-doped crystal lasers. Appl.Opt. 42: 5463 ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Miyazoe Y., Maeda M. (1971). On the spiking phenomenon in organic dye laser. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-7: 36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nenchev, M., Gizbrekht, A.: Two-frequency, flash-lamp pumped dye laser using a high effective intracavity bem-splitter, Sov. J. Appl. Spectroskopy, 39, 208, 1983; Nenchev, M.: Two-wavelength laser with interference wedge selector-channel coupler, Bulgarian Patent, IIR-Sofia, No 53347, 1981Google Scholar
  15. Nenchev M., Stoykova E. (1993). Interference wedge properties relevant to laser applications: transmission and reflection of restricted light beams. Opt. Quantum Electron. 25: 789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schäfer F.P., Wenchong L., Szatmári S. (1983). Short UV laser pulse generation by quenching of resonator transient. Appl. Phys. B-32: 123 ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Stoykova E., Nenchev M. (1996). Reflection and transmission of the unequal mirror interference wedge. Opt. Quantum Electron. 28: 155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Svelto, O.: Principles of lasers, 4th eds., Translated by Hanna, D. Plenum Press, New York, 8-9, 250-300, 1998Google Scholar
  19. Szatmári S., Schäfer F.P. (1984). Excimer–laser–pumped ps–dye laser. Appl. Phys. B-33: 95 ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Veith G., Schmidt A.J. (1979). Generation of tunable subnanosecond laser pulses with a nitrogen laser pumped dye laser amplifier system. Opt. Commun. 30: 437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wyatt R. (1978). Narrow linewidth, short pulse operation of a nitrogen-laser - pumped dye laser. Opt. Commun. 26: 429 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Zeller J., Rudolph W., Sheik– Bahae M. (1998). Theoretical and experimental investigation of a quenched cavity laser with saturable absorber. Appl. Phys. B-66: 295 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margarita A. Deneva
    • 1
  • Pepa I. Uzunova
    • 2
  • Marin N. Nenchev
    • 3
  1. 1.Technical University-Sofia, Plovdiv BranchPlovdivBulgaria
  2. 2.Department of Physics and BiophysicsPre-clinical Univ. CentreSofiaBulgaria
  3. 3.Institute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of ScienceSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations