Optical and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 38, Issue 4–6, pp 429–443 | Cite as

Polarization Switching Bistability and Dynamics in Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Laser under Orthogonal Optical Injection

  • I. Gatare
  • J. Buesa
  • H. Thienpont
  • K. Panajotov
  • M. Sciamanna
Article

Abstract

Bistability as well as dynamics associated to polarization switching in a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) submitted to orthogonal optical injection from an external master laser are investigated. Intensity-polarization switching bistability is studied by increasing and decreasing the intensity of the injected beam and for a fixed frequency detuning, i.e. the frequency offset between master and the free running VCSEL. Depending on the frequency detuning, bistable switching is experimentally found to occur with or without injection locking of the fundamental mode to the master laser frequency. For large positive detuning, injection locking of the first-order transverse mode with a strong depression of the fundamental mode has been observed. The case of frequency – polarization switching bistability, i.e. when the frequency detuning is first decreased and then increased for a fixed injected power, has also been theoretically analyzed. Qualitative comparison with previous experimental work is presented for the dependence of the width of the bistable switching region on the injection strength level. Finally we show an experimental result of complicated dynamics including period doubling route to chaos that accompany polarization switching and which motivates future theoretical investigations.

Keywords

bistability laser dynamics optical injetion polarization switching vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSEL) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Iga, K. 2000IEEE J. Select Top Quantum Electron61201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choquette, K.D., Leinbenguth,  1994IEEE J. Photon. Technol. Lett.640CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Jansenvan Doorn, A.K., Exter, M.P., Woerdman, J.P. 1994Electron. Lett.301941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choquette, K.D., Schneider, R.P.,Jr., Lear, K.L. 1995IEEE J. Quantum Electron1661Google Scholar
  5. Panajotov K., Vershaffelt G., Albert J., Nagler B., Peeters M., and Dankaert J. IEEE/LEOS Benelux chapter, Proceedings symposium, Delft, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. Pan, Z.G., Jiang, S., Dagenais, M., Morgan, R.A., Hojima, K., Asom, M.T., Leinbenguth, R.E. 1993Appl. Phys. Lett.632999CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Hong, Y., Shore, K. 2000Electron. Lett.362019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lang, R. 1982IEEE J. Quantum Electron18976CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Henry, C.H., Olson, N.A., Dutta, N.K. 1985IEEE J. Quantum Electron211152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mogensen, F., Olesen, H., Jacobsen, G. 1985Electron. Lett.21696Google Scholar
  11. Goldberg, L., Taylor, H.L., Weller, J.F., Scifres, D.R. 1985Appl. Phys. Lett.46236CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Kobayashi, S., Kimura, T. 1980IEEE J. Quantum Electron16915CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, H., Lucas, T.L., McInerney, J.G., Wright, M.W., Morgan, R.A. 1996IEEE J. Quantum Electron32227CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang-Hasnain C.H., Chrostowski L., C.J. Chang-Hasnain and Chow W.W.,. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 14 1635, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. San Miguel, M., Feng, Q., Moloney.,  1995Phys. Rev. A521728CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Ragalado, J.M., Prati, F., San Miguel, M., Abraham, N.B. 1997IEEE J. Quantum Electron33765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Simpson, T.B. 2003Opt. Commun215135CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Gatare
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Buesa
    • 2
  • H. Thienpont
    • 2
  • K. Panajotov
    • 2
  • M. Sciamanna
    • 1
  1. 1.Supélec – Ecole Supérieure d’Electricité and Laboratoire Matériaux OptiquesPhotonique et Systèmes (LMOPS), CNRS UMR-7132MetzFrance
  2. 2.Department of Applied Physics and Photonics (TW-TONA)Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations