Advertisement

Open Economies Review

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 947–973 | Cite as

Market Access, Labor Mobility, and the Wage Skill Premium: New Evidence from Chinese Cities

  • Hongbing Li
  • Hongbo Cai
  • Suparna ChakrabortyEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Labor market reforms in developing economies have causes economic regions to open up, providing greater market access to businesses and leading to urban migration. This paper studies what happens to the wage skill premium in this process. Who gains – skilled or unskilled workers? Using data collected from a survey of 331 Chinese cities to construct a new market access index, this paper empirically analyzes the impact of increased market access on the wage skill premium. Using the theoretical framework of new economic geography and the tools of spatial externality, combined with quantile regression techniques, we find that there exists an inverted U-shaped relationship between market access and the wage skill premium. An increase in market access initially attracts high-skilled labor with promises of increased returns that increases the wage skill premium until a threshold is reached, beyond which it starts to decline. The conduit of this relationship is the impact that market access has on returns to education. The observed pattern is robust to alternative tests.

Keywords

Market access Labor mobility Wage skill premium New economic geography Spatial externality 

JEL Classification

F16 J24 J31 J61 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thanks to the editor and anonymous reviewer(s) for their valuable comments. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71503024), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (9192015), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (71773007, 71403024). and University of San Francisco Faculty Development Fund. All authors have contributed equally to the development of this manuscript.

References

  1. Acemoglu D (1998) Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Q J Econ 113(4):1055–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahearne AG, Fernald JG, Loungani P, et al. (2006) Flying geese or sitting ducks: China's impact on the trading fortunes of other Asian economies. SSRN Electron JGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist JD, Pischke JS, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist's companion, vol 1. Princeton university press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campos NF, Dabušinskas A (2009) So many rocket scientists, so few marketing clerks: estimating the effects of economic reform on occupational mobility in Estonia. Eur J Polit Econ 25(2):261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campos NF, Jolliffe D (2007) Earnings, Schooling and Economic Reform: Econometric Evidence from Hungary (1986-2004). World Bank Economic Review, 21(3):509-526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Combes P (2000) Economic structure and local growth: France, 1984–1993. J Urban Econ 47(3):329–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Combes P-P, Duranton G, Gobillon L (2008) Spatial wage disparities: sorting matters! J Urban Econ 63(2):723–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feenstra RC, Hanson GH (1996) Globalization, outsourcing, and wage inequality (no. w5424). National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernald J, Edison H, Loungani P (1999) Was China the first domino? Assessing links between China and other Asian economies. J Int Money Financ 18(4):515–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fingleton B, López-Bazo E (2006) Empirical growth models with spatial effects. Pap Reg Sci 85(2):177–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foster-McGregor N, Poeschl J, Stehrer R (2016) Offshoring and the Elasticity of Labour Demand. Open Econ Rev 27(3):515–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankel J, Romer D (1999) Does trade cause growth? Am Econ Rev 89(3):379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables J (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanson GH (2003) Firms, workers and the geographic concentration of economic activity. In: Clark GM, Feldman MG (eds) The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 477–494Google Scholar
  15. Hanson GH (2005) Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration. J Int Econ 67:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Head K, Mayer T (2006) Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36:573–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heckman JJ (1979) Statistical models for discrete panel data. Department of Economics and Graduate School of business, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Heckman J (2005) Sample selection Bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hering L, Poncet S (2010) Market access impact on individual wages: evidence from China. Rev Econ Stat 92(1):145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamal F, Lovely E, Ouyang P (2012) Does deeper integration enhance spatial advantages? Market access and wage growth in China. Int Rev Econ Financ 23:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu X, He X, Yin X (2007) Market access and regional wage gap: empirical research based on the panel data of Chinese Prefecture-Level City. Manag World 9:48–55Google Scholar
  23. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience and earnings. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Ottaviano G, Pinelli D (2006) Market potential and productivity: evidence from Finnish regions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36(5):636–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rahman H, Fujita M (1990) Product variety, Marshallian externalities, and City sizes. J Reg Sci 30(2):165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Redding S, Venables A (2004) Economic geography and international inequality. J Int Econ 62(1):53–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F (2004) Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. J Econ Growth 9:131–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in honor of Thomas RothenbergGoogle Scholar
  30. Troske KR (1999) Evidence on the employer size-wage premium from worker-establishment matched data. Rev Econ Stat 81(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Wooldridge PD (2006) The changing composition of official reserves. BIS Quarterly ReviewGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu D (2012) Market access and the disparity of regional development: Empirical from China City economy. World Econ Forum 1:33–52Google Scholar
  34. Xu B, Li W (2008) Trade, technology, and China's rising skill demand1. Econ Transit 16(1):59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao Z, Shi M, Yang J (2012) Market proximity, supply adjacent and apace China manufacturing distribution –analysis based on input output model among Chinese provinces. Econ Quart 3:1059–1078Google Scholar
  36. Zhou S, Yang H, Li K (2012) Trade, technology, institution and Chinese industrial sector wage premium. Chin Econ Issues 01:22–31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.University of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations