Advertisement

Real Exchange Rates and the Balance of Trade: Does the J-curve Effect Really Hold?

  • M. Ege Yazgan
  • Serda Selin Ozturk
Research Article
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we re-examine the relationship between trade flows, real effective exchange rates, and incomes by using the bilateral trade flows of 33 countries that form more than two-thirds of total world trade. For each country, we consider the bilateral trade flows of the country under consideration vis-à-vis all other countries. The analysis reveals the fact that for most of the countries, a real depreciation of the home currency has favorable effects on the home country’s trade balance in the long run. This long-run effect manifests itself in the short run for a small number of countries, indicating the fact that satisfying the Marshall-Lerner condition in the short run is more difficult. However, there is no evidence for the J-curve phenomenon, which suggests an initial deterioration in the trade balance in the short run following a depreciation.

Keywords

Competitive devaluation Marshall-Lerner condition J-Curve Panel data Panel data cointegration CCE estimator 

JEL Classification

C23 F10 F30 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editor and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Arize AC, Malindretos J, Igwe EU (2017) Do exchange rate changes improve the trade balance: an asymmetric nonlinear cointegration approach. Int Rev Econ Financ 49:313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahmani-Oskooee M (1985) Devaluation and the j-curve: some evidence from ldcs. The review of Economics and Statistics 500–504Google Scholar
  3. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Fariditavana H (2015) Nonlinear ardl approach, asymmetric effects and the j-curve. J Econ Stud 42(3):519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Fariditavana H (2016) Nonlinear ardl approach and the j-curve phenomenon. Open Econ Rev 27(1):51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Goswami GG, Talukdar BK (2005) The bilateral j-curve: Australia versus her 23 trading partners. Aust Econ Pap 44(2):110–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Halicioglu F, Hegerty SW (2016) Mexican bilateral trade and the j-curve: an application of the nonlinear ardl model. Econ Anal Policy 50:23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Hegerty SW (2010) The j-and s-curves: a survey of the recent literature. J Econ Stud 37(6):580–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Hegerty SW (2011) The j-curve and nafta: evidence from commodity trade between the us and mexico. Appl Econ 43(13):1579–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Ratha A (2004) The j-curve: a literature review. Appl Econ 36(13):1377–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Wang Y (2006) The j curve: China versus her trading partners. Bull Econ Res 58(4):323–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Wang Y (2007) The j-curve at the industry level: evidence from trade between us and australia. Aust Econ Pap 46(4):315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Wang Y (2008) The j-curve: evidence from commodity trade between us and china. Appl Econ 40(21):2735–2747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Banerjee A, Carrion-i Silvestre JL (2015) Cointegration in panel data with structural breaks and cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 30(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyd D, Caporale GM, Smith R (2001) Real exchange rate effects on the balance of trade: cointegration and the marshall–lerner condition. Int J Financ Econ 6(3):187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2013) Large panel data models with cross-sectional dependence: a survey. CAFE Research Paper (13.15)Google Scholar
  16. Chudik A, Pesaran MH, Tosetti E (2011) Weak and strong cross-section dependence and estimation of large panels. Econ J 14(1):C45–C90Google Scholar
  17. Holly S, Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2010) A spatio-temporal model of house prices in the usa. J Econ 158(1):160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kapetanios G, Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2011) Panels with non-stationary multifactor error structures. J Econ 160(2):326–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magee SP (1973) Currency contracts, pass-through, and devaluation. Brook Pap Econ Act 1973(1):303–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Persyn D, Westerlund J (2008) Error-correction-based cointegration tests for panel data. Stata J 8(2):232–241Google Scholar
  21. Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pesaran MH, Schuermann T, Smith LV (2009) Forecasting economic and financial variables with global vars. Int J Forecast 25(4):642–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pesaran MH, Smith LV, Yamagata T (2013) Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure. J Econ 175(2):94–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pesaran MH, Tosetti E (2011) Large panels with common factors and spatial correlation. J Econ 161(2):182–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rose AK, Yellen JL (1989) Is there a j-curve? J Monet Econ 24(1):53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sarafidis V, Wansbeek T (2012) Cross-sectional dependence in panel data analysis. Econ Rev 31(5):483–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang G, Macdonald R (2014) Real exchange rates, the trade balance and net foreign assets: long-run relationships and measures of misalignment. Open Econ Rev 25(4):635–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIstanbul Bilgi UniversityEyupTurkey

Personalised recommendations