Open Economies Review

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 451–467 | Cite as

New Evidence on Trade and FDI: how Large is the Euro Effect?

  • Mariam Camarero
  • Estrella Gómez-Herrera
  • Cecilio Tamarit
Research Article
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper we analyse the effect that the euro has had on trade using a gravity model for 28 countries and covering the period 1990–2013. Our gravity specification includes time-varying fixed effects, correcting any possible bias that may arise from multilateral resistance variables or unobserved time-varying heterogeneity. Additionally, we explore the potential complementarity or substitution relationship between FDI and trade by including FDI inward and outward stocks in the specification. The time period in the dataset covers the creation and evolution of the European Monetary Union (EMU), starting from the introduction of notes and coins and including the recent economic crisis. Overall, our results show a positive effect of the EMU on trade and reveal the existence of a complementary relationship between trade and FDI.

Keywords

FDI Trade Euro effect 

JEL Classification

F10 F15 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge ISCEF Organizing Committee for the opportunity of presenting this article at the 4th International Symposium in Computational Economics and Finance. We also thank the Editor in Chief, the Guest Editor and the anonymous referees for their contribution to the improvement of this paper. Finally, the authors also acknowledge the financing from Spanish MINEIC and FEDER [project ECO2017-83255-C3-3-P].

References

  1. Aizenman J, Ilan N (2006) FDI and trade – two way linkages? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 46:317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque R, Loayza N, Serven L (2005) World market integration through the lens of foreign direct investors. J Int Econ 66:267–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JE, Yotov Y (2012) Gold standard gravity. NBER working papers 7835Google Scholar
  4. Anderson J (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69:106–116Google Scholar
  5. Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93:170–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baier S, Bergstrand J (2001) The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity. J Int Econ 53:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baier S, Kerr A, Yotov Y (2017) Gravity, distance, and international trade. Survey to be published in a book by Edgar Elgar publishing, draftGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin R, Taglioni D, (2006) Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. NBER working paper no. 12516Google Scholar
  9. Baldwin R, Di Nino V, Lionel Fontagné RADS, Taglioni D (2008) Study on the impact of the euro on trade and foreign direct investment. Econ Pap 321Google Scholar
  10. Bénassy-Quéré A, Coupet M, Mayer T (2007) Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment. World Econ 30:764–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergin PR, Lin CY (2012) The dynamic effects of a currency union on trade. J Int Econ 87:191–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergstrand J (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67:474–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brouwer J, Paap R, Viaene JM (2008) The trade and FDI effects of EMU enlargement. J Int Money Financ 27:188–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bun MJ, Klaassen FJ (2002) Has the euro increased trade? Tinbergen institute discussion paper no. 02-108/2, University of AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Camarero M, Tamarit C (2004) Estimating exports and imports demand for manufactured goods: the role of FDI. Weltwirtsch Archiv 140:347–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Camarero M, Gómez E, Tamarit C (2013) EMU and trade revisited: long-run evidence using gravity equations. World Econ 36:1146–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Camarero M, Gómez E, Tamarit C (2014) Is the ‘euro effect´ on trade so small after all? New evidence using gravity equations with panel cointegration techniques. Econ Lett 124:140–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Campbell DL (2013) Estimating the impact of currency unions on trade: solving the Glick and rose puzzle. World Econ 36:1278–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Sousa J, Lochard J (2011) Does the single currency affect foreign direct investment?, scan. J Econ 113:553–578Google Scholar
  20. De Sousa J (2012) The currency union effect on trade is decreasing over time. Econ Lett 117:917–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Devereux MP, Griffith R, Klemm A (2002) Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition. Econ Policy 17(35):449–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eicher TS, Henn C (2011) One money, one market. A revised benchmark. Rev Int Econ 19:419–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faruqee H (2004) Measuring the trade effects of EMU. IMF Working Paper No 04/154Google Scholar
  24. Flam H, Nordstrom H (2006) Trade volume effects of the euro: aggregate and sector estimates. Institute for International Economic Studies Seminar Papers no. 746, Stockholm UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Fontagné L (1999) Foreign direct investment and international trade: complements or substitutes?. OECD science, technology and industry working papers 1999/3Google Scholar
  26. Fontagné L, Mayer T, Ottaviano GIP (2009) Of markets, products and prices: the effects of the euro on European firms. Intereconomics 44:149–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-009-0289-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frankel J, Rose AK (1998) The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. Econ J 108:1009–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feenstra R (ed) (2004) Advanced international trade: theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. Feenstra R, Markusen J, Rose A (2001) Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Can J Econ 34:430–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glick R, Rose AK (2002) Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence. Eur Econ Rev 46:1125–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glick R, Rose AK (2016) Currency unions and trade: a post-EMU reassessment. Eur Econ Rev 87:78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Helpman E, Melitz M, Rubinstein Y (2008) Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Q J Econ 123:441–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katayama H, Melatos M (2011) The nonlinear impact of currency unions on bilateral trade. Econ Lett 112:94–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelejian H, Tavlas GS, Petroulas P (2012) In the neighborhood: the trade effects of the euro in a spatial framework. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koike R (2004) Japan's foreign direct investment and structural changes in Japanese and east Asian trade, monetary and economic. Studies 22:145–182Google Scholar
  36. Kreinin M, Plummer M (2008) Effects of regional integration on FDI: an empirical approach. Journal of Asian Economics 19:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Micco A, Stein E, Ordonez G (2003) The currency union effect on trade: early evidence from the European Union. Econ Pol 18:315–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitze T, Bjorn A, Gerhard U (2010) Trade-FDI linkages in a simultaneous equations system of gravity models for German regional data. Economie Internationale 122:121–162Google Scholar
  39. Petroulas P (2007) The effect of the euro on foreign direct investment. Eur Econ Rev 51:1468–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rose AK (2000) One money. One Market: The Effect of Common Currencies on Trade, Econ Pol 15:9–45Google Scholar
  41. Rose AK, Stanley TD (2005) A meta-analysis of the effect of common currencies on international trade. J Econ Surv 19:347–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rose A (2017) Why do estimates of the EMU effect on trade vary so much? Open Econ Rev 28:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Santos-Silva JM, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88:641–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schiavo S (2007) Common currencies and FDI flows. Oxf Econ Pap 59:536–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Serlenga L, Shin Y (2007) Gravity models of intra-eu trade: application of the ccep-ht estimation in heterogeneous panels with unobserved common time-specific factors. J Appl Econ 22:361–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yotov YV, Piermartini R, Monteiro J-A, Larch M (2016) An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: the structural gravity model. UNCTAD and WTO, Geneva, p 67Google Scholar
  47. Westerlund J, Wilhelmsson F (2009) Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Appl Econ 43:1–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariam Camarero
    • 1
  • Estrella Gómez-Herrera
    • 2
  • Cecilio Tamarit
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsJaume I UniversityCastellónSpain
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Applied Economics IIUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations