# Testing Macro Models by Indirect Inference: A Survey for Users

Research Article

First Online:

- 286 Downloads
- 13 Citations

## Abstract

With Monte Carlo experiments on models in widespread use we examine the performance of indirect inference (II) tests of DSGE models in small samples. We compare these tests with ones based on direct inference (using the Likelihood Ratio, LR). We find that both tests have power so that a substantially false model will tend to be rejected by both; but that the power of the II test is substantially greater, both because the LR is applied after re-estimation of the model error processes and because the II test uses the false model’s own restricted distribution for the auxiliary model’s coefficients. This greater power allows users to focus this test more narrowly on features of interest, trading off power against tractability.

## Keywords

Bootstrap DSGE New Keynesian New classical Indirect inference Wald statistic Likelihood ratio## JEL Classification

C12 C32 C52 E1## References

- Basawa IV, Mallik AK, McCormick WP, Reeves JH, Taylor RL (1991) Bootstrapping unstable first-order autoregressive processes. Ann Stat 19:1098–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bernanke BS, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1999) The financial accelerator in a business cycle framework, Handbook of Macroeconomics. In: Taylor JB, Woodford M (eds), vol 1, ch. 21. Elsevier, pp 1341–1393Google Scholar
- Canova F (1994) Statistical inference in calibrated models. J Appl Econ 9:S123–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Canova F (1995) Sensitivity analysis and model evaluation in dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. Int Econ Rev 36:477–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Canova F (2005) Methods for Applied Macroeconomic Research. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Christiano L (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M, Evans CL (2005) Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. J Polit Econ 113(1):1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clarida R, Gali J, Gertler ML (1999) The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. J Econ Lit 37(4):1661–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dai L, Minford P, Zhou P (2014) A DSGE model of China, cardiff economics working paper No E2014/4, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper 10238, CEPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Dave C, Jong D, DN (2007) Structural macroeconomics. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
- Del Negro M, Schorfheide F (2004) Priors from general equilibrium models for VARs. Int Econ Rev 45:643–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Del Negro M, Schorfheide F (2006) How good is what you’ve got? DSGE-VAR as a toolkit for evaluating DSGE models. Economic Review Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Q2:21–37Google Scholar
- Del Negro M, Schorfheide F, Smets F, Wouters R (2007a) On the fit of new Keynesian models. J Bus Econ Stat 25:123–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Del Negro M, Schorfheide F, Smets F, Wouters R (2007b) Rejoinder to comments on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:159–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans R, Honkapohja S (2005) Interview with Thomas J. Sargent. Macroecon Dyn 9:561–583. 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Faust J (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models. J Bus Econ Stat 25:154–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez-Villaverde J, Rubio-Ramirez F, Sargent T, Watson M (2007) ABCs (and Ds) of understanding VARs. American Economic Review 97:1021–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Friedman M (1953) The methodology of positive economics, in essays in positive economics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Gallant AR (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:151–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gourieroux C, Monfort A (1995) Simulation based econometric methods. CORE lectures series, Louvain-la-NeuveGoogle Scholar
- Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Renault E (1993) Indirect inference. J Appl Econ 8:S85–S118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gregory A, Smith G (1991) Calibration as testing: Inference in simulated macro models. J Bus Econ Stat 9:293–303Google Scholar
- Gregory A, Smith G (1993) Calibration in macroeconomics. In: Maddala G (ed) Handbook of Statistics, vol 11. Elsevier, St. Louis, Mo., pp 703–719Google Scholar
- Hansen BE (1999) The grid bootstrap and the autoregressive model. Rev Econ Stat 81:594–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hansen L P, Heckman J J (1996) The empirical foundations of calibration. J Econ Perspect 10(1):87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Horowitz JL (2001a) The bootstrap. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer E (eds) Handbook of Econometrics, vol.5, ch. 52. Elsevier, pp 3159–3228Google Scholar
- Horowitz JL (2001b) The bootstrap and hypothesis tests in econometrics. J Econom 100:37–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Juillard M (2001) DYNARE: a program for the simulation of rational expectations models. Computing in economics and finance 213. Society for Computational EconomicsGoogle Scholar
- Kilian L (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:156–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Le VPM, Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens M (2010) Two orthogonal continents? testing a two-country DSGE model of the us and the eu using indirect inference. Open Econ Rev 21(1):23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Le VPM, Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens M (2011) How much nominal rigidity is there in the US economy — testing a New Keynesian model using indirect inference. J Econ Dyn Control 35(12):2078–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Le VPM, Meenagh D, Minford P (2012) What causes banking crises? An empirical investigation. Cardiff working paper No E2012/14, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper no 9057, CEPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Le VPM, Meenagh D, Minford P (2014) Monetarism rides again? US monetary policy in a world of Quantitative Easing, Cardiff working paper No E2014/22, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper 10250, CEPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Le VPM, Minford P, Wickens M (2013) A Monte Carlo procedure for checking identification in DSGE models, working paper E2013/4, Cardiff Economics Working Papers, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paperGoogle Scholar
- Le VPM, Matthews K, Meenagh D, Minford P, Xiao Z (2014) Banking and the macroeconomy in China: A banking crisis deferred Open Econ Rev 25(1):123–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu C, Minford P (2014a) Comparing behavioural and rational expectations for the US post-war economy. Econ Model 43(C):407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu C, Minford P (2014b) How important is the credit channel? An empirical study of the US banking crisis. J Bank Finance 41:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lucas RE (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: A critique, Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy No. 1, The Phillips Curve and Labour markets. In: Brunner K, Meltzer A (eds) supplement to Journal of Monetary EconomicsGoogle Scholar
- McCallum BT (1976) Rational expectations and the natural rate hypothesis: some consistent estimates. Econometrica 44:4–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens M R (2009) Testing a DSGE model of the EU Using indirect inference. Open Econ Rev 20(4):435–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens M R, Xu Y (2015) Comparing Indirect inference and likelihood testing methods: asymptotic and small sample results. Working paper, Cardiff Economics Working Papers No E2015/4, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics SectionGoogle Scholar
- Meenagh D, Minford P, Nowell E, Sofat P (2010) Can a real business cycle model without price and wage stickiness explain UK real exchange rate behaviour J Int Money Financ 29(6):1131–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens MR (2012) Testing macroeconomic models by indirect inference on unfiltered data, Cardiff Working Paper No E2012/17, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper no 9058, CEPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Minford P, Ou Z (2013) Taylor Rule or optimal timeless policy? Reconsidering the Fed’s behavior since 1982. Econ Model 32(C):113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Minford P, Theodoridis K, Meenagh D (2009) Testing a model of the UK by the method of indirect inference. Open Econ Rev 20(2):265–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Minford P, Ou Z, Wickens M (2012) Revisiting the Great Moderation: policy or luck? working paper E2012/9, Cardiff Economics Working Papers, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; forthcoming Open Economies ReviewGoogle Scholar
- Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sims CA (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:152–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smets F, Wouters R (2003) An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(5):p1123–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smets F, Wouters R (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A Bayesian DSGE approach. Am Econ Rev 97:586–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith A (1993) Estimating nonlinear time-series models using simulated vector autoregressions. J Appl Econ 8:S63–S84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watson M (1993) Measures of fit for calibrated models. J Polit Econ 101:1011–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wieland V, Wolters M H (2012) Forecasting and policy making. In: Elliott G, Timmerman A (eds) Handbook of economic forecasting, Vol. 2. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
- Wickens MR (1982) The efficient estimation of econometric models with rational expectations. Rev Econ Stud 49:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wickens MR (2013) How useful are DSGE macroeconomic models for forecasting? Open Econ Rev 25:171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015