Advertisement

Open Economies Review

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 351–377 | Cite as

Did the Classical Gold Standard Lead to Greater Price Level Convergence? A New Approach

  • William MilesEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Some previous research has indicated that the classical gold standard led to greater price level co-movement among member countries than would be observed in later Bretton Woods and floating exchange rate regimes. This paper examines the subject of price co-movement under the gold standard with a set of recently developed techniques which examine both differences in the magnitude as well as in the sign of price level movements across countries, and which yield period-by-period estimates of how coherent price levels are across nations. Our results suggest that contrary to previous research, the classical gold standard did not appear to lead to greater price level co-movement. Neither, moreover, did the gold standard appear to move prices apart, as would be expected if two countries joined the gold standard with misaligned inflation rates. These results are similar to those of more recent research on the classical gold standard, in which previous purported effects of the metallic standard (on the cost of capital, the level of trade, and business cycle synchronization) have been found either to not exist or to be much smaller in magnitude than previously believed.

Keywords

Exchange Rates Gold Standard Price Levels 

JEL Codes

F4 N1 

References

  1. A’Hearn B, Woitek U (2001) More International Evidence on the Historic Properties of Business Cycles. J Monet Econ 47:321–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1994) “Economic Performance under Alternative Exchange Rate Regimes: Some Historical Evidence”, in P. Kenen, F. Papadia and F. Saccomanni (eds.), The International Monetary System, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Bayoumi T, Eichengreen B (1996) The Gold Standard and the International Monetary System”. In: Bayoumi T, Eichengreen B, Taylor M (eds) Modern Perspectives on the Gold Standard. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman U, Jonung L (2010) Business Cycle Synchronization in Europe: Evidence from the Scandinavian Currency Union”. Manch Sch 79:268–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benetrix, A., K. O’Rourke and J. Williamson (2014) “The Spread of Manufacturing to the Periphery 1870-2007”, Open Economies Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  6. Bordo M (1993) The Gold Standard, Bretton Woods and Other Monetary Regimes: A Historical Reappraisal”. Fed Reserv Saint Louis Rev 75:123–191Google Scholar
  7. Bordo M, Landon-Lane J, Redish A (2010) Deflation, Productivity Shocks and Gold: Evidence from the 1880–1914 Period”. Open Econ Rev 21(4):515–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bordo M, Rockoff H (1996) The Gold Standard as a ‘Good Housekeeping’ Seal of Approval”. J Econ His 56:389–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavallo, A., B. Neiman and R. Rigobon (2014) “Currency Unions, Product Introductions and the Real Exchange Rate”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  10. Calvo G, Vegh C (1994) Inflation Stabilization and Nominal Anchors”. Contemp Econ Pol 12:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chernyshoff N, Jacks D, Taylor A (2009) Stuck on Gold: Real Exchange Rate Volatility and the Rise and Fall of the Gold Standard 1875-1939”. JInt Econ 77:195–205Google Scholar
  12. Ciccarelli M, Mojon B (2010) Global Inflation”. Rev Econ Stat 92:524–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper R (1982) The Gold Standard: Historical Facts and Future Prospects”. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darby M, Lothian J (1989) The International Transmission of Inflation Afloat”. In: Bordo M (ed) Money, History and International Finance. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Dellas H, Tavlas G (2013) The Gold Standard, The Euro, and the Origins of the Greek Sovereign Debt Crisis”. Cato J 33:491–520Google Scholar
  16. Eichengreen B (2001) Capital Account Liberalization: What do the Cross-Country Studies Tell Us?”. World Bank Econ Rev 15:341–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flandreau M, Maurel M (2005) Monetary Union, Trade Integration and Business Cycles in 19th Century Europe”. Open Econ Rev 16:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flandreau M, Zumer F (2004) The Making of Global Finance. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Flandreau M, Le Cacheux J, Zumer F (1998) Stability without a Pact? Lessons from the European Gold Standard, 1880-1914”. Econ Policy 13:115–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lopez Cordova J, Meissner C (2003) Exchange Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard Era”. Am Econ Rev 93:344–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miles W, Vijverberg C (2014) Did the Classical Gold Standard Lead to Greater Business Cycle Synchronization? Evidence from New Measures”. Kyoklos 67:87–109Google Scholar
  22. Mink M, Jacobs J, de Haan J (2012) Measuring Coherence of Output Gaps with an Application to the Euro Area”. Oxford Econ Papers 64:217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell, B.R. (2007a) International Historical Statistics Africa and Asia 1750–2005, Palgrave-MacMillanGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell, B.R. (2007b) International Historical Statistics Americas 1750–2005, Palgrave-MacMillanGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchell, B.R. (2007c) International Historical Statistics Europe 1750–2005, Palgrave-MacMillanGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchener K, Shizume M, Weidenmier M (2010) Why did Countries Adopt the Gold Standard? Lessons from Japan”. J of Econ Histy 70:27–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchener, K. and M. Weidenmier (2009) “Are Hard Pegs Ever Credible in Emerging Markets? Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 15401.Google Scholar
  28. Officer, L. (2001) “Gold Standard”,” in EH. Net Encyclopedia. Economic History Services, EH. Net, URL: http://www.eh.net/encyclopedia/officer.gold.standard.php
  29. Rogoff K (1996) The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle”. J of Econ Lit 34:647–688Google Scholar
  30. Wolf N, Ritschl A (2011) Endogeneity of Currency Areas and Trade Blocs: Evidence from a Natural Experiment”. Kyklos 64:291–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA

Personalised recommendations