Open Economies Review

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 61–79 | Cite as

Trade Integration and Business Cycle Synchronization in the EMU: The Negative Effect of New Trade Flows

Research Article
First Online:

Abstract

This paper questions the impact of trade integration on business cycle sychronization in the EMU by distinguishing increase of existing trade flows (the intensive margin) and creation of new trade flows (the extensive margin). Using a DSGE model, we find that synchronization is weakened when new firms are allowed to export as a response to productivity gains. Consistenly with our model and using disaggregated data over 1995–2007 for the 11 founding members of the EMU, we find that trade intensity has a positive direct effect while new trade flows have a negative effect on business cycle synchronization. Furthermore, new flows play essentially an indirect role by intensifying specialization and explain 60 % of the overall effect of trade intensity and specialization on synchronization.

Keywords

Trade integration Business cycles European Monetary Union 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Nathalie Colombier for helpful assistance. We are also grateful to Angela Cheptea, Valérie Mignon, and Daniel Mirza.

References

  1. Abbott A, Easaw J, Xing T (2008) Trade integration and business cycle convergence: is the relation robust across time and space? Scand J Econ 110(2):403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babetskii I (2005) Trade integration and synchronization of shocks. Econ Transit 13(1):105–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter M, Kouparitsas MA (2003) Trade structure, industrial structure, and international business cycles. Am Econ Rev 93(2):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter M, Kouparitsas MA (2005) Determinants of business cycle comovement: a robust analysis. J Monet Econ 52(1):113–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behrens K, Corcos G, Mion G (2013) Trade crisis? What trade crisis? Rev Econ Stat 95(2):702–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger H, Nitsch V (2008) Zooming out: the trade effect of the euro in historical perspective. J Int Money Financ 27(8):1244–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergin PR, Lin C-Y (2009) Exchange rate regimes and the extensive margin of trade, in NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2008, NBER Chapters, pp. 201–227. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Bergin PR, Lin C-Y (2012) The dynamic effects of a currency union on trade. J Int Econ 87(2):191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilbiie FO, Ghironi F, Melitz MJ (2012) Endogenous entry, product variety, and business cycles. J Polit Econ 120(2):304–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bricongne J-C, Fontagné L, Gaulier G, Taglioni D, Vicard V (2012) Firms and the global crisis: French exports in the turmoil. J Int Econ 87(1):134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burgert M, Dées S (2009) Forecasting world trade: direct versus “bottom-up” approaches. Open Econ Rev 20(3):385–402Google Scholar
  12. Canzoneri MB, Cumby RE, Diba BT (2007) Euler equations and money market interest rates: a challenge for monetary policy models. J Monet Econ 54(7):1863–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark TE, van Wincoop E (2001) Borders and business cycles. J Int Econ 55(1):59–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corsetti G, Martin P, Pesenti P (2013) Varieties and the transfer problem. J Int Econ 89(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darvas Z, Rose AK, Szapary G (2005) Fiscal divergence and business cycle synchronization: irresponsibility is idiosyncratic. In: NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2005, NBER Chapters, pp. 261–298. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. De Haan J, Inklaar R, Jong-A-Pin R (2008) Will business cycles in the euro area converge? A critical survey of empirical research. J Econ Surv 22(2):234–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dées S, Zorell N (2012) Business cycle synchronisation: disentangling trade and financial linkages. Open Econ Rev 23(4):623–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demyanyk Y, Volosovych V (2008) Gains from financial integration in the European Union: evidence for new and old members. J Int Money Financ 27(2):277–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira-Lopes A, Pina A (2011) Business cycles, core, and periphery in monetary unions: comparing Europe and North America. Open Econ Rev 22(4):565–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fidrmuc J, Korhonen I (2003) Similarity of supply and demand shocks between the euro area and the CEECs, Economic Systems. Elsevier 27(3):313–334Google Scholar
  21. Flam H, Nordström H (2006) Euro effects on the intensive and extensive margins of trade, CESifo Working Paper Series 1881, CESifo Group MunichGoogle Scholar
  22. Fonseca R, Patureau L, Sopraseuth T (2010) Business cycle comovement and labor market institutions: an empirical investigation. Rev Int Econ 18(5):865–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frankel JA, Rose AK (1998) The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. Econ J 108(449):1009–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaulier G, Zignago S (2009) BACI: International Trade Database at the Product-level: The 1994–2007 Version, Working Paper 2009–05, CEPII Research CenterGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris MN, Kónya L, Mátyás L (2012) Some stylized facts about international trade flows. Rev Int Econ 20(4):781–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Havránek T (2010) Rose effect and the euro: is the magic gone? Rev World Econ 146(2):241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Imbs J (2004) Trade, finance, specialization, and synchronization. Rev Econ Stat 86(3):723–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Imbs J (2010) The first global recession in decades. IMF Econ Rev 58(2):327–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Imbs J, Mauro P (2007) Pooling risk among countries, IMF Working Papers, 07/132Google Scholar
  30. Inklaar R, Jong-A-Pin R, de Haan J (2008) Trade and business cycle synchronization in OECD countries-a re-examination. Eur Econ Rev 52(4):646–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sørensen BE, Yosha O (2003) Risk sharing and industrial specialization: regional and international evidence. Am Econ Rev 93(3):903–918Google Scholar
  32. Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sørensen BE, Yosha O (2005) Who will own Europe? The Internationalization of Asset Ownership in the EU Today and in the Future, chap. Asymmetric Shocks and Risk Sharing in a Monetary Union: Updated Evidence and Policy Implications for Europe, pp. 173–206. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalemli-Ozcan S, Papaioannou E, Peydro-Alcalde JL (2009) Financial integration and business cycle synchronization, Discussion Paper 7292, C.E.P.R. Discussion PapersGoogle Scholar
  34. Kose MA, Prasad ES, Terrones ME (2003) How does globalization affect the synchronization of business cycles? Am Econ Rev 93(2):57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lane PR, Milesi-Ferretti GM (2007) The external wealth of nations mark II: revised and extended estimates of foreign assets and liabilities, 1970–2004. J Int Econ 73(2):223–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee J, Rhee W (2013) Financial factors in the business cycle of a small open economy: the case of Korea. Open Econ Rev 24(5):881–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Otto G, Voss G, Willard L (2001) Understanding OECD Output Correlations,? RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2001-05, Reserve Bank of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose AK, Stanley TD (2005) A meta-analysis of the effect of common currencies on international trade. J Econ Surv 19(3):347–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CREM CNRS 6211 – University of CaenCaenFrance
  2. 2.CREM CNRS 6211 – University of Rennes 1RennesFrance

Personalised recommendations