Open Economies Review

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 597–621 | Cite as

From the Great Moderation to the Global Crisis: Exchange Market Pressure in the 2000s

Research Article

Abstract

We study exchange market pressures (EMP) and using international reserves by emerging markets (EMs) during the 2000s. We find that financial considerations dominated trade factors. The impact of gross short-term external debt quintuples during the crisis. Capital outflows and deleveraging was the force behind EMP rise during the global financial crisis. Greater FDI (greater portfolio debt) inflows prior to the crisis were associated with a lower (higher) crisis EMP, respectively. The severity of the financial shock was exacerbated by financial ties to the U.S., while the trade shock was more severe in EMs with a larger commodity export share.

Keywords

Exchange market pressure Financial and trade factors International reserves Global crisis 

JEL classification

F15 F21 F31 F32 

References

  1. Aizenman J, Lee J (2007) International reserves: precautionary versus mercantilist views, theory and evidence. Open Econ Rev 18(2):191–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizenman J, Chinn MD, Ito H (2010) The emerging global financial architecture: tracing and evaluating new patterns of the trilemma configuration. J Int Money Finance 29(4):615–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balakrishnan R, Danninger S, Elekdag S and Tytell I (2009) The transmission of financial stress from advanced to emerging economies. IMF Working Paper # 09–133Google Scholar
  4. Borio B, Disyatat P (2011) Global imbalances and the financial crisis: link or no link? BIS Working Papers 346Google Scholar
  5. Chinn M, Ito H (2006) What matters for financial development? Capital controls, institutions, and interactions. J Finance Dev 81(1):163–192Google Scholar
  6. Clemente J, Montanes A, Reyes M (1998) Testing for a unit root in variables with a double change in the mean. Econ Lett 59(2):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Girton L, Roper D (1977) A Monetary model of exchange market pressure applied to the postwar Canadian experience. Am Econ Rev 67:537–48Google Scholar
  8. Hummels D, Ishii J, Yi K-M (2001) The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. J Int Econ 54(1):75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankel J (2009) New estimation of China’s exchange rate regime. Pac Econ Rev 14:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frankel J and Saravelos G (2010) Are leading indicators of financial crises useful for assessing country vulnerability? Evidence from the 2008–09 Global Crisis. NBER working paper 16047Google Scholar
  11. Kimura F, Takahashi Y, Hayakawa K (2007) Fragmentation and parts and components trade: comparison between East Asia and Europe. N Am J Econ Finance 18(1):23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lane PR, Milesi-Ferretti GM (2007) The external wealth of nations mark II. J Int Econ 73:223–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ricci LA, Milesi-Ferretti GM, and Lee J (2008) Real exchange rates and fundamentals: a cross-country perspective. IMF Working Papers, January 2008 Vol., pp. 1–25Google Scholar
  14. Rose KA and Spiegel MM (2009) Cross-country causes and consequences of the 2008 crisis: international linkages and American exposure. NBER working paper 15358Google Scholar
  15. Spatafora N and Tytell I (2009) Commodity terms of trade: the history of booms and busts. IMF Working Papers # 09–205Google Scholar
  16. Stock JH, Watson MW (2002) Has the business cycle changed and why? NBER Macroecon Annu 17:159–218Google Scholar
  17. Tanner EC (2002) Exchange market pressure, currency crises, and monetary policy: additional evidence from emerging markets. IMF Working Paper # 02–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCSC and the NBER Economics E2Santa CruzUSA
  2. 2.Research Department IMFWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.MED, Bank for International Settlements (BIS)BaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations