Open Economies Review

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 237–261

Does Cultural Distance Hinder Trade in Goods? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Member Nations

Research Article

Abstract

We examine the effect of cultural distance, a proxy for the lack of a minimum reservoir of trust necessary to initiate and complete trade deals, on bilateral trade flows. Employing data for 67 countries that span the years 1996–2001, we estimate a series of modified gravity specifications and find that cultural dissimilarity between nations has an economically significant and consistently negative effect on aggregate and disaggregated trade flows; however, estimated effects vary in magnitude and economic significance across measures of trade and our cohort of OECD reference countries. The consistently negative influence of cultural distance indicates that policymakers may wish to consider mechanisms that enhance the build-up of trust and commitment when seeking to facilitate the initiation and completion of international trade deals. Our findings also imply that coefficient estimates from related studies that do not account for the trade-inhibiting effect of cultural distance may be biased.

Keywords

Cultural distance Gravity Immigration Trade 

JEL Classification

F14 F15 F22 

Supplementary material

11079_2008_9090_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (365 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 364 KB)

References

  1. Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69(1):106–116 MarchGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson E, Gatignon H (1996) Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions. J Int Bus Stud 17(3):1–26 September doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal S (1994) Socio-cultural distance and the choice of joint ventures: a contingency perspective. J Int Mark 2:63–80Google Scholar
  4. Barkema HG, Shenkar O, Vermeulen F, Bell JHJ (1997) Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Acad Manage J 40(2):426–442 April doi:10.2307/256889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boisso D, Ferrantino M (1997) Economic distance, cultural distance, and openness in international trade: empirical puzzles. J Econ Integration 12(4):456–484 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell NCG, Graham JL, Jolibert A, Meissner HG (1988) Marketing negotiations in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. J Mark 52(2):49–62 April doi:10.2307/1251264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deardorff AV (2004) Local comparative advantage: trade costs and the pattern of trade. Research Seminar in International Economics Discussion Paper #500, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunlevy JA (2006) The impact of corruption and language on the pro-trade effect of immigrants: Evidence from the American States. Rev Econ Stat 88(1):182–186 JulyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eaton J, Tamura A (1994) Bilateralism and regionalism in Japanese and U.S. trade and foreign direct investment patterns. J Jpn Int Econ 8(4):478–510 December doi:10.1006/jjie.1994.1025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghosh S, Yamarik S (2004) Are regional trading agreements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. J Int Econ 63(2):369–395 July doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00058-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gould DM (1994) Immigration links to the home country: empirical implications for US bilateral trade flows. Rev Econ Stat 76(2):302–316 May doi:10.2307/2109884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham JL, Kim DK, Lin C-Y, Robinson M (1988) Buyer-seller negotiations around the Pacific Rim: Differences in fundamental exchange processes. J Consum Res 15(1):48–54 June doi:10.1086/209144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2005) Cultural biases in economic exchange, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 11005. NBER, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagenaars J, Kalman L, Moors G (2003) Exploring Europe’s basic values map. In: Arts W, Hagenaars J, Halman L (eds) The cultural diversity of European unity. Koninklijke Brill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. Head K, Ries J (1998) Immigration and trade creation: econometric evidence from Canada. Can J Econ 31(1):47–62 February doi:10.2307/136376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international difference in work related values. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchinson WK (2002) Does ease of communication increase trade? Commonality of language and bilateral trade. Scott J Polit Econ 49(5):544–556 November doi:10.1111/1467-9485.00247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inglehart R, Basanez M, Diez-Medrano J, Halman L, Luijkx R (eds) (2004) In: Human beliefs and values: a cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 values surveys. Siglo Veintiuno Editores, S.A. de C.V., Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  19. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2007) International financial statistics [computer file]. IMF, Washington, DC (November)Google Scholar
  20. Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J Int Bus Stud 19(3):411–432 September doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larimo J (2003) Form of investment by Nordic firms in world markets. J Bus Res 56(10):791–803 October doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00467-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linders G-J, Slangen A, deGroot HLF, Beugelsdijk S (2005) Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper-TI-2005-074/3, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  23. Migration Policy Institute (2007) Country and comparative data, Washington, DC. http://www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/comparative.cfm. Accessed November, 2007
  24. Neal M (1998) The culture factor: cross-national management and foreign venture. MacMillan, HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  25. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2007) SourceOECD STAN Bilateral Trade Database. http://fiordiliji.sourceoecd.org/vl=7411482/cl=27/nw=1/rpsv/home.htm. Accessed November, 2007
  26. Ranjan P, Tobias J (2005) Bayes and gravity, WP# 05026. Iowa State University, Ames (October)Google Scholar
  27. Tadesse B, White R (2007) Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: Do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences? Appl Econ Lett (in press)Google Scholar
  28. Tinbergen J (1962) The world economy. Suggestions for an international economic policy. Twentieth Century Fund, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2006) CIA world factbook. https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html. Accessed November 2007
  30. Wagner D, Head K, Ries J (2002) Immigration and the trade of provinces. Scott J Polit Econ 49(5):507–525 December doi:10.1111/1467-9485.00245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. White R, Tadesse B (2007) Immigration policy, cultural pluralism and trade: evidence from the White Australia Policy. Pac Econ Rev 12(4):489–509 October doi:10.1111/j.1468-0106.2007.00368.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. World Bank (2006) World development indicators: CD-ROM version. Development Data Group of the World Bank’s International Economics Department, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Minnesota—DuluthDuluthUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsFranklin and Marshall CollegeLancasterUSA

Personalised recommendations