Can Import Tariffs Deter Outward FDI?
- 175 Downloads
In this paper we analyze a country's optimal trade policy when its labor market is unionized and firms are footloose. We show that an important objective for governments to use import protection is to prevent their domestic multinationals to go to a non-unionized location abroad and to serve their country from a distance. A domestic government will set a positive tariff to dissuade its multinational from engaging in outward FDI when the additional profits it repatriates, do not compensate for the loss of domestic union rent. To put it differently, we show that when the domestic labor market is unionized, trade liberalisation between countries with similar wage levels is likely to result in domestic welfare losses as a result of outward FDI. Only when wage differences between countries are large enough, can outward FDI improve domestic welfare and optimal tariffs will be zero.
KeywordsFDI monopoly union trade policy Cournot competition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aitken, Brian, Anne Harrison, and Robert Lipsey (1995) “Wages and Foreign Ownership: A Comparative Study of Mexico, Venezuela and the US”, NBER WP no 5102.Google Scholar
- Belderbos, Rene (1997) “Antidumping and Tariff Jumping Japanese firms' DFI in the EU and US.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133(3):419–457.Google Scholar
- Booth, Allison (1995) Trade Unions. Cambridge University Press, p. 295.Google Scholar
- Brander, James and Barbara Spencer (1981) “Tariffs and the Extraction of Monopoly Rents Under Potential Entry.” Canadian Journal of Economics 3:374–389.Google Scholar
- Dei, Fumo (1990) “A Note on Multinational Corporations in a Model of Reciprocal Dumping.” Journal of International Economics 29(1–2):161–171.Google Scholar
- Feenstra, Robert and Gordon Hanson (1996) “Globalization, Outsourcing and Wage Inequality.” American Economic Review 86(2):240–245.Google Scholar
- Hillman, Arye and Heinrich Ursprung (1993) “Multinational Firms, Political Competition and International Trade Policy.” International Economic Review 34(2) May:347–364.Google Scholar
- Lankes, Hans-Peter and Anthony Venables (1996) “FDI in Economic Transition: The Changing Pattern of Investments.” Economics of Transition 4(2):331–347.Google Scholar
- Pain, Nigel and Katherine Wakelin (1998) “Export Performance and the Role of FDI.” The Manchester School 5–16.Google Scholar
- Rowthorn, Robert (1992) “Intra-Industry Trade and Investment under Oligopoly; The Rrole of Market Size.” Economic Journal 35–69.Google Scholar
- Slaughter, Matthew (1995) “Multinational Corporations, Outsourcing and American Wage Divergence.” NBER working paper 5253.Google Scholar
- Veugelers, Reinhilde and Hylke Vandenbussche (1999) “European Antidumping Policy and the profitability of National and International collusion.” European Economic Review January 43/1:1–28.Google Scholar