Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On credit and blame: disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the idea that policy-makers are motivated by the desire to earn “credit” for their work has a long history, policy studies since Weaver (J Public Policy 6(4):371–398, 1986) have also used the concept of “blame” to help understand these often observed but little studied aspect of policy decision-making activity. Observed credit- and blame-related activities range from the agenda-denial behaviour of politicians to the use of policy evaluations to paint overly positive pictures of the effectiveness of policy efforts. Despite their frequent invocation by analysts, however, the status of “blame” and “credit” and their component parts is not well understood and different uses and conceptions of the term abound in the policy literature. This article addresses three issues surrounding the concepts which require clarification: first, the relationship between “blame” and “credit” as motivators of policy agents and activities; second, the related but not synonymous behavioural notions of “blame avoidance” and “credit claiming” and their relationship to more primordial ideas of “blame” and “credit”; and third, the notions of “reactive” versus “anticipatory” blame avoidance and credit claiming. The article develops a framework to help move the discussion of these three issues and of the basic concept forward. It argues that blame especially should be studied more widely from the view of the public as well as that of the public official, and that both concepts should be analysed as part of the larger issue of the legitimation of public actions, rather than, as is often the case, solely as an aspect of the utilitarian calculations and risk management activities of politicians and officials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, D., Lewis, J. M., & Considine, M. (2014). How governments think: Skills, expertise, and experience in public policy making. In D. Alexander, J. M. Lewis, & M. Considine (Eds.), Making public policy decisions: Expertise, skills and experience (pp. 44–65). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (2009). Illusions of accountability: Credit and blame sense making in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31(3), 322–339. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806310302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baekkeskov, E., & Rubin, O. (2016). Information dilemmas and blame-avoidance strategies: From secrecy to lightning rods in Chinese Health Crises. Governance. doi:10.1111/gove.12244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balla, S. J., Lawrence, E. D., Maltzman, F., & Sigelman, L. (2012). Partisanship, blame avoidance, and the distribution of legislative pork. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 515–525. doi:10.2307/3088396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamforth, N., & Leyland, P. (Eds.). (2013). Accountability in the contemporary constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J., & Mookherjee, D. (1990). Norms, third-party sanctions, and cooperation. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 6(1), 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. (2012). Media, risk, and absence of blame for “Acts of God”: Attenuation of the European volcanic ash cloud of 2010. Risk Analysis, 32, 1693–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2011). From ‘flood defence’ to ‘flood risk management’: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, G., Kleinjans, R., Villasante, S., & O’Leary, B. C. (2016). Landing the blame: The influence of EU Member States on quota setting. Marine Policy, 64, 9–15. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catney, P., & Henneberry, J. (2012). (Not) Exercising discretion: Environmental planning and the politics of blame-avoidance. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 549–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., & Ross, M. H. (Eds.). (1997). Cultural strategies of agenda denial: Avoidance, attack, and redefinition. Lawrence: Univ Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1987). Norms as social capital. In G. Radnitzky & P. Bernholz (Eds.), Economic imperialism. The economic method applied outside the field of economics. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Free riders and zealots: The role of social networks. Sociological Theory, 6, 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, J. B., & Marx, P. (2013). Losing the issue, losing the vote: Issue competition and the reform of unemployment insurance in Germany and Sweden. Political Studies, 61(3), 505–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, J., & Grant, B. (2017). Multiple agents, blame games and public policy-making: The case of local government reform in New South Wales. Australian Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. (1986). Explaining the privatization boom: Public choice versus radical approaches. Public Administration, 64(1), 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1986). The case for a multiple-utility conception. Economics and Philosophy, 2, 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L. A., & Sarat, A. (1980). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming claiming. Law & Society Review, 15(¾), Special Issue on Dispute Processing and Civil Litigation, 631–654.

  • Garpenby, P., & Nedlund, A. (2016). Political strategies in difficult times—The ‘backstage’ experience of Swedish Politicians on formal priority setting in healthcare. Social Science and Medicine. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giger, N., & Nelson, M. (2010). The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity? European Journal of Political Research, 50, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2005). Moral sentiments and material interests, the foundation of cooperation in economic life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (1980). Manipulatory politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. (1982). Political theory and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2001). Gun policy, opinion, tragedy and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue frames. The Journal of Politics, 63(2), 520–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. (2015). Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 297–322. doi:10.1177/0957926514564736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. (2017a). Anticipative strategies of blame avoidance in government: The case of communication guidelines. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(2), 219–241. doi:10.1075/jlp.15019.han.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. (2017b). Defensive semiotic strategies in government: A multimodal study of blame avoidance. Social Semiotics. doi:10.1080/10350330.2017.1334358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K., & Sundstrom, L. M. (2010). Global commons, domestic decisions: The comparative politics of climate change. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heggelund, G., Andresen, S., & Buan, I. F. (2010). Chinese climate policy: Domestic priorities, foreign policy, and emerging implementation. In K. Harrison & L. M. Sundstrom (Eds.), Global commons, domestic decisions: The comparative politics of climate change. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, M. G. (2003). Assessing leadership style: A trait analysis. In M. P. Jerrold (Ed.), The psychological assessment of political leaders with profiles of saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton (pp.178–214). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

  • Hinterleitner, M. (2015). Reconciling perspectives on blame avoidance behaviour. Political Studies Review, 15(2), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2014). Avoiding blame—A comprehensive framework and the Australian home insulation program fiasco. Policy Studies Journal. doi:10.1111/psj.12088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B. W., & Peters, B. G. (1985). The pathology of public policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2002). Managing risk and managing blame: A political science perspective. In A. Weale, (Ed.), Risk, democratic citizenship and public policy. British Academy occasional papers (pp. 73–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press/British Academy.

  • Hood, C. (2002b). The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition, 37(1), 15–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2007). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? Public Management Review, 9(2), 191–210. doi:10.1080/14719030701340275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., Jennings, W., & Copeland, H. (2015). Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: Reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy. Public Administration. doi:10.1111/padm.12235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., Jennings, W., Dixon, R., Hogwood, B., & Beeston, C. (2009). Testing times: Exploring staged responses and the impact of blame management strategies in two examination fiasco cases. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 695–722. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01830.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Rothstein, H. (2001). Risk regulation under pressure: Problem solving or blame shifting. Administration & Society, 33(1), 21–53. doi:10.1177/00953990122019677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R. (2017). Heuristics for practitioners of policy design: Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems. Public Policy and Administration. doi:10.1177/0952076717709338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the ‘Hollow State’: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2012). The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. International Political Science Review, 33(5), 539–555. doi:10.1177/0192512112453603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2014). Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making. Global Environmental Change. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2017). Policy tools and their role in policy formulation: Dealing with procedural and substantive policy instruments. In M. Howlett, & I. Muhkerjee (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation (pp. 96–111). Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.

  • Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Kemmerling, A. (2017). Calibrating climate change policies: The causes and consequences of sustained under-reaction. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2017.1324772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Wu, X. (2015). Understanding the persistence of policy failures: The role of politics, governance and uncertainty. Public Policy and Administration, 30, 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. (2010). Realizing water transitions: The role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, H. M., & Mann, D. E. (1980). Policy failure: An issue deserving analysis. In H. M. Ingram & D. E. Mann (Eds.), Why policies succeed or fail. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. S. (2008). The politics of when: Restribution, investment and policy making for the long term. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environmental Politics, 17, 349–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E., Medina, M., & Ozdemir, U. (2014). Pass the bucks: Credit, blame, and the global competition for investment. International Studies Quarterly, 58(3), 433–447. doi:10.1111/isqu.12106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 150(1), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M., & Reich, M. R. (2014). Between credit claiming and blame avoidance: The changing politics of priority-setting for Korea’s National Health Insurance System. Health Policy, 115(1), 9–17. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J., & Anheier, H. (1999). The third sector and the European Union policy process: An initial evaluation. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (1992). Civic norms, social sanctions and voting turnout. World Bank. Available at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28080/. MPRA Paper No. 28080, posted 14. January 2011 15:04.

  • Ledyard, J. O. (1994). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. Working Paper, California Institute of Technology. In J. Kagel, & A. E. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Leertouwer, E., & Maier, P. (2001). Who creates political business cycles: Should central banks be blamed? European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, N. (2015). Commentary: Let’s find out more about preemptive blame shifting. Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/puar.12489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. J. (1994). Public spirit in political systems. In H. J. Aron, T. E. Mann, & T. Taylor (Eds.), Values and public policy (pp. 146–172). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maor, M. (2014a). Policy bubbles: Policy overreaction and positive feedback. Governance, 27(3), 469–487. doi:10.1111/gove.12048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maor, M. (2014b). Policy persistence, risk estimation and policy underreaction. Policy Sciences, 47(4), 425–443. doi:10.1007/s11077-014-9203-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maor, M. (2016). The implications of the emerging disproportionate policy perspective for the new policy design studies. Policy Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9259-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maor, M., Tosun, J., & Jordan, A. (2017). Proportionate and disproportionate policy responses to climate change: Core concepts and empirical applications. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2017.1281730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M., & Tilley, J. (2010). The attribution of credit and blame to governments and its impact on vote choice. British Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 115. doi:10.1017/S0007123409990275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvel, J. D. (2014). The Boston Marathon Bombings: Who’s to blame and why it matters for public administration. Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/puar.12263.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. (2010a). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Imprint Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • McConnell, A. (2010b). Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362. doi:10.1017/S0143814X10000152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A., Gauja, A., & Botterill, L. C. (2008). Policy fiascos, blame management and AWB limited: The Howard government’s escape from the iraq wheat scandal. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. M. (1990). Avoiding blame: An experimental investigation of political excuses and justifications. British Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 99–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. M. (1991). Managing blame: An experimental test of the effects of political accounts. The American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1133–1157. doi:10.2307/1963939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, P. B. (2012). ‘It’s the Central Government’s Fault’: Elected regional officials use of blame-shifting rhetoric. Governance, 25(3), 439–461. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01585.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, P. B. (2013). (De-)Centralisation and attribution of blame and credit. Local Government Studies, 39(2), 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. (2012). Extra-network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: The Hurricane Katrina example. Governance, 25, 567–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, N. (2002). Post-communist regime support in space and time context. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 18(2), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. (2015). Credit-claiming or blame avoidance? Comparing the relationship between welfare state beliefs and the framing of social policy retrenchment in France and Germany. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1005928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, D. (2003). Constitutional reform in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, L. A., & Weaver, R. K. (2003). The government taketh away: The politics of pain in the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P., & Myles, J. (2001). The comparative political economy of pension reform. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.

  • Plescia, C., & Kritzinger, S. (2016). Retrospective voting and party support at elections: Credit and blame for government and opposition. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. doi:10.1080/17457289.2016.1243543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analysis of political choice. The American Political Science Review, 82(3), 719–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapeli, L. (2016). Who to punish? Retrospective voting and knowledge of government composition in a multiparty system. International Political Science Review, 37(4), 407–421. doi:10.1177/0192512114555346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resodihardjo, S. L., Carroll, B. J., van Eijk, C. J. A., & Maris, S. (2016). Why traditional responses to blame games fail: The importance of context, rituals, and sub-blame games in the face of raves gone wrong. Public Administration, 94(2), 350–363. doi:10.1111/padm.12202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238. doi:10.2307/975901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (1998). What can the state do? An analytical model. In Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state (theories of institutional design, pp. 71–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598449.00.

  • Rothstein, H. (2003). Risk management under wraps: Self-regulation and the case of food contact plastics. Journal of Risk Research, 6, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change an advocacy coalition framework. Science Communication, 8(4), 649–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., (Ed.) (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. (2nd ed.). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saward, M. (1992). Co-optive politics and state legitimacy. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European union revisited: input, output, throughput?. Political Studies, 61(1),2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, G. (2012). ‘Marx’ or the Market? Intra-party power and social democratic welfare state retrenchment. West European Politics, 35(5), 1024–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, G., Vis, B., & van Kersbergen, K. (2013). Political parties’ welfare image, electoral punishment and welfare state retrenchment. Comparative European Politics, 11(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, A. (2013). Scapegoating. In K. B. Penuel, M. Statler, & R. Hagen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of crisis management. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. (2014). The paradox of social resilience: How cognitive strategies and coping mechanisms attenuate and accentuate resilience. Global Environmental Change, 25, 194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G. (2007). Policy failure, policy learning and policy development in a context of internationalization. In: Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Saskatoon.

  • Stone, C. N. (1988). Preemptive power: Floyd Hunter’s “Community Power Structure” reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 82–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2010). Reflection in the shadow of blame: When do politicians appoint commissions of inquiry? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 613–634. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R., & Hood, C. (2005). Blame avoidance with adjectives? Motivation, opportunity, activity and outcome. In Paper for ECPR joint sessions, blame avoidance and blame management workshop, April 14–20, Granada Spain.

  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R., & Sheffer, L. (2012). A formal model of social blame in political context. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, January 12. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1984379.

  • Sussman, G. (2004). The USA and global environmental policy: Domestic constraints on effective leadership. International Political Science Review, 25(4), 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twight, C. (1991). From claiming credit to avoiding blame: The evolution of congressional strategy for asbestos management. Journal of Public Policy, 11(2), 153–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulen, T. S. (1990). The theory of rational choice, its shortcomings, and the implications for public policy decision making. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilizations, 12(2), 170–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977). The emergence of norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vis, B. (2016). Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), 122–137. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1005955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallner, J. (2008). Legitimacy and public policy: Seeing beyond effectiveness, efficiency, and performance. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. I. (2006). Policy failure and policy change British Security Policy after the cold war. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 490–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K. (1987). The politics of blame. The Brookings Review, 5(2), 43–47. doi:10.2307/20079973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K. (1989). Setting and firing policy triggers. Journal of Public Policy, 9(3), 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K. (2013). Policy leadership and the blame trap: Seven strategies for avoiding policy stalemate. Governance Studies at Brookings, 1–9.

  • Weimer, D. L. (2006). The puzzle of private rulemaking: Expertise, flexibility, and blame avoidance in U.S. regulation. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 569–582. doi:10.2307/3843942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, G. (2014). Blame avoidance, electoral punishment and the perceptions of risk. Journal of European Social Policy, 24, 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, G., & Hörisch, F. (2016). Framing effects and comparative social policy reform: Comparing blame avoidance evidence from two experiments. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), 157–175. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1053743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. (2006). Risk, fear, blame, shame and the regulation of public safety. Economics and Philosophy, 22(3), 409. doi:10.1017/S0266267106001040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, H. (1981). The determinants of program success and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 1(4), 433–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Ching Leong & Michael Howlett

  2. Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada

    Michael Howlett

Authors
  1. Ching Leong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Howlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Howlett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leong, C., Howlett, M. On credit and blame: disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour. Policy Sci 50, 599–618 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9290-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9290-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation