Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: a review of the scholarship

  • Andrea K. Gerlak
  • Tanya Heikkila
  • Sharon L. Smolinski
  • Dave Huitema
  • Derek Armitage
Research Article

Abstract

In acknowledgement of the complexity of environmental challenges, research on learning in environmental policy has grown substantially over the past two decades across a range of disciplines. Despite this growth, there are few comprehensive assessments of the literature on learning in environmental policy. This article fills this gap by providing insights on the overall coherence and impact of this body of scholarship. To do so, we analyze a sample of 163 articles from 2004 to 2014 using a standardized coding framework. The results provide an in-depth assessment of the status of the literature on learning in the context of environmental policy, as well as the quality of the literature. We demonstrate that despite the diversity in research questions and goals, the literature is lacking with respect to diversity in cases and context, theoretical development, clear conceptualization and operationalization of learning, and advancements in empirical approaches to study learning. From these insights, we discuss the challenges and opportunities for scholars in studying learning and provide recommendations for building the theoretical and methodological rigor of the field.

Keywords

Learning Environmental challenges Governance Policy 

Supplementary material

11077_2017_9278_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (106 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 105 kb)

References

  1. Albright, E. A. (2011). Policy change and learning in response to extreme flood events in Hungary: an advocacy coalition approach. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird, J., Plummer, R., Haug, C., & Huitema, D. (2014). Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 27(July 2014), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardsley, D. K., & Sweeney, S. M. (2010). Guiding climate change adaptation within vulnerable natural resources management systems. Environmental Management, 45(5), 1127–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendt, P., Barthel, S., & Colding, J. (2013). Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. (2011). Barriers and opportunities in transforming to sustainable governance: The role of key individuals. In Ö. Bodin & C. Prell (Eds.), Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance (pp. 75–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bomberg, E. (2006). Policy learning in an enlarged European Union: Environmental NGOs and new policy instruments. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(2), 248–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bond, A. J., Dockerty, T., Lovett, A., Riche, A. B., Haughton, A. J., Bohan, D. A., et al. (2011). Learning how to deal with values, frames and governance in sustainability appraisal. Regional Studies, 45(8), 1157–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bos, J. J., Brown, R. R., & Farrelly, M. A. (2013a). A design framework for creating social learning situations. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bos, J. J., Brown, R. R., Farrelly, M. A., & de Haan, F. J. (2013b). Enabling sustainable urban water management through governance experimentation. Water Science and Technology, 67(8), 1708–1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bressers, J Th A, & Rosenbaum, W. A. (2000). Innovation, learning, and environmental policy: Overcoming a plague of uncertainties. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Henriksen, H. J., & van der Keur, P. (2011). More is not always better: Coping with ambiguity in natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(1), 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brummel, R. F., Nelson, K. C., Souter, S. G., Jakes, P. J., & Williams, D. R. (2010). Social learning in a policy-mandated collaboration: Community wildfire protection planning in the eastern United States. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(6), 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castella, J. C. (2009). Assessing the role of learning devices and geovisualisation tools for collective action in natural resource management: Experiences from Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 1313–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, J. R. A., & Clarke, R. (2011). Local sustainability initiatives in English National Parks: What role for adaptive governance? Land Use Policy, 28(1), 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colvin, J., Ballim, F., Chimbuya, S., Everard, M., Goss, J., Klarenberg, G., et al. (2008). Building capacity for co-operative governance as a basis for integrated water resource managing in the Inkomati and Mvoti catchments, South Africa. Water SA, 34(6), 681–689.Google Scholar
  18. Connor, R., & Dovers, S. (2004). Institutional change for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crona, B.I., & Parker, J.N. (2012). Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 32. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss1/art32/
  20. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.Google Scholar
  21. Cundill, G., Cumming, G. S., Biggs, D., & Fabricius, C. (2012). Soft systems thinking and social learning for adaptive management. Conservation Biology, 26(1), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dessie, Y., Schubert, U., Wurzinger, M., & Hauser, M. (2013). The role of institutions and social learning in soil conservation innovations: Implications for policy and practice. Environmental Science and Policy, 27(March 2013), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dessie, Y., Wurzinger, M., & Hauser, M. (2012). The role of social learning for soil conservation: The case of Amba Zuria land management, Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 19(3), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diduck, A. (2010). The learning dimension of adaptive capacity: Untangling the multi-level connections. In D. Armitage & R. Plummer (Eds.), Adaptive capacity and environmental governance (pp. 199–220). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ducrot, R. (2009). Gaming across scale in peri-urban water management: contribution from two experiences in Bolivia and Brazil. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 16(4), 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Faysse, N., Errahj, M., Imache, A., Kemmoun, H., & Labbaci, T. (2014). Paving the way for social learning when governance is weak: Supporting dialogue between stakeholders to face a groundwater crisis in Morocco. Society and Natural Resources, 27(3), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feindt, P. H. (2010). Policy-learning and environmental policy integration in the common agricultural policy, 1973–2003. Public Administration, 88(2), 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fiorino, D. J. (2001). Environmental policy as learning: A new view of an old landscape. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 322–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garmendia, E., Gamboa, G., Franco, J., Garmendia, J. M., Liria, P., & Olazabal, M. (2012). Social multi-criteria evaluation as a decision support tool for integrated coastal zone management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 53(7), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garmendia, E., & Stagl, S. (2010). Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1712–1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gerring, J. (2012). Social science methodology: A framework (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Goertz, G. (2005). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Grainger, A. (2012). Forest sustainability indicator systems as procedural policy tools in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haug, C., Huitema, D., & Wenzler, I. (2011). Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(6), 968–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lesson for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hezri, A. A., & Dovers, S. R. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Yalcin, R. (2009). Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art26/. Accessed 25 April 2016.
  41. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Ison, R., Blackmore, C., & Iaquinto, B. L. (2013). Towards systemic and adaptive governance: Exploring the revealing and concealing aspects of contemporary social-learning metaphors. Ecological Economics, 87(March, 2013), 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keen, M., Brown, V., & Dybal, R. (2005). Social learning in environmental management. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  44. Leach, W. D., Weible, C. M., Vince, S. R., Siddiki, S. N., & Calanni, J. (2014). Fostering learning in collaborative partnerships: Evidence from marine aquaculture in the United States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, T., & van de Meene, S. (2012). Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network. Policy Sciences, 45(3), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Levrel, H., & Bouamrane, M. (2008). Instrumental learning and sustainability indicators: Outputs from co-construction experiments in West African biosphere reserves. Ecology and Society, 13(1), 28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art28/
  47. Lin, H. (2012). Strategic alliances for environmental improvements. Business and Society, 51(2), 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Hockings, M., Haward, M., & Kriwoken, L. (2012). Marine biodiversity conservation governance and management: Regime requirements for global environmental change. Ocean and Coastal Management, 69, 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luks, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2007). Transdisciplinarity for social learning? The contribution of the German socio-ecological research initiative to sustainability governance. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 418–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lundholm, C., & Plummer, R. (2010). Resilience and learning: a conspectus for environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 16(5–6), 475–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lynam, T., de Jong, W., Sheil, D., Kusumanto, T., & Evans, K. (2007). A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art5/
  52. Maurel, P., Craps, M., Cernesson, F., Raymond, R., Valkering, P., & Ferrand, N. (2007). Concepts and methods for analysing the role of information and communication (IC-tools) in social learning processes for river basin management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22(5), 630–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McDaniels, T. L., & Gregory, R. (2004). Learning as an objective within a structured risk management decision process. Environmental Science and Technology, 38(7), 1921–1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Milbrath, L. W. (1989). Envisioning: A sustainable society: Learning our way out. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  55. Montpetit, E., & Lachapelle, E. (2015). Can policy actors learn from academic scientists? Environmental Politics, 24(5), 661–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 5(3), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2012). Time to talk? How the structure of dialog processes shapes stakeholder learning in participatory water resources management. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss1/art3/
  58. Nevis, E. C., DiBella, A. J., & Gould, J. M. (1995). Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 73–85.Google Scholar
  59. Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nilsson, M. (2005). The role of assessments and institutions for policy learning: A study on Swedish climate and nuclear policy formation. Policy Sciences, 38(4), 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental, 19(3), 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pietri, D. M., Stevenson, T. C., & Christie, P. (2015). The Coral Triangle Initiative and regional exchanges: Strengthening capacity through a regional learning network. Global Environmental Change, 33(August 2009), 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Raymond, C.M., & Cleary, J. (2013). A tool and process that facilitate community capacity building and social learning for natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 25. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss1/art25/
  65. Reed, M. S., Evely, A.C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, K.A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., & Stringer, L.C. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15(4), r1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/
  66. Robards, M. D., & Lovecraft, A. L. (2010). Evaluating comanagement for social-ecological fit: Indigenous priorities and agency mandates for Pacific Walrus. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rodela, R. (2011). Social learning and natural resource management: the emergence of three research perspectives. Ecology and Society, 16(4), 30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss4/art30/
  68. Rodela, R. (2013). The social learning discourse: Trends, themes and interdisciplinary influences in current research. Environmental Science and Policy, 25, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rodela, R., Cundill, G., & Wals, A. E. J. (2012). An analysis of the methodological underpinnings of social learning research in natural resource management. Ecological Economics, 77, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  72. Siebenhüner, B. (2008). Learning in international organizations in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Siebenhüner, B., Rodela, R., & Ecker, F. (2016). Social learning research in ecological economics: A survey. Environmental Science & Policy, 55(Part 1), 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sinclair, A. J., Diduck, A., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2008). Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: critical reflections on 15 years of research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(7), 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Singleton, R., & Straits, B. R. (2005). Approaches to social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tabara, J.D., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art3/
  77. van de Kerkhof, M., & Wieczorek, A. (2005). Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 733–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. van der Wal, M., De Kraker, J., Offermans, A., Kroeze, C., Kirschner, P. A., & van Ittersum, M. (2014). Measuring social learning in participatory approaches to natural resource management. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Videira, N., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Lopes, R. (2010). A participatory modelling approach to support integrated sustainability assessment processes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(4), 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang, E. T. G., Wei, H. L., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2006). User diversity impact on project performance in an environment with organizational technology learning and management review processes. International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Webster, M., Jakobovits, L., & Norton, J. (2008). Learning about climate change and implications for near-term policy. Climatic Change, 89(1–2), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weible, C. M., Pattison, A., & Sabatier, P. A. (2010). Harnessing expert-based information for learning and the sustainable management of complex socio-ecological systems. Environmental Science and Policy, 13(6), 522–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Williams, B. K. (2011). Adaptive management of natural resources-framework and issues. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(5), 1346–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilner, K. B., Wiber, M., Charles, A., Kearney, J., Landry, M., & Wilson, L. (2012). Transformative learning for better resource management: the role of critical reflection. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(10), 1247–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea K. Gerlak
    • 1
  • Tanya Heikkila
    • 2
  • Sharon L. Smolinski
    • 2
  • Dave Huitema
    • 3
    • 4
  • Derek Armitage
    • 5
  1. 1.Udall Center for Studies in Public PolicyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.School of Public AffairsUniversity of Colorado, DenverDenverUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM)Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Science, Faculty of Management, Science, and TechnologyNetherlands Open UniversityHeerlenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.School of Environment, Resources and SustainabilityUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations