The construction of urgency discourse around mega-projects: the Israeli case
- 403 Downloads
Various studies have pointed to urgency in decision-making as a major catalyst for policy change. Urgency evokes a crisis frame in which emotions and cognitive and institutional biases are more likely to be mobilised in support of the policy preferences of powerful actors. As a result, decision-makers tend to be driven by emotions and opportunity, often with detrimental results for the quality of the planning process. Although urgency has such a profound influence on the quality of decision-making, little is known about how, when and by whom urgency is constructed in the planning process of public infrastructure. By means of a discourse analysis, this study traces the timing, motives and ways actors discursively construct a sense of urgency in decision-making on the building of terminals for the reception and treatment of the natural gas that was recently found off the coast of Israel. The results of this study indicate that government regulators, but also private sector actors, deliberately constructed an urgency discourse at critical moments during the planning process. By evoking terms that resonated with the target audience, regulators employed urgency as an instrument to legitimise unorthodox planning practices whilst precluding the consideration of alternative planning solutions. Thus, urgency framing is a means of controlling both the discourse and the agenda—and is therefore an exercise in power maintenance—by entrenched interest groups.
KeywordsMega-projects Infrastructure Planning Urgency Crisis Discourse Framing
We would like to thank Gil Tal and Moshe Maor who shared with us their invaluable insights and expertise that greatly assisted our research, and three anonymous referees for their useful suggestions and constructive comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We would like to express our gratitude to The Levi Eshkol Institute at The Hebrew University for partially funding this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Altshuler, A. A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Barkat, A. (2013, December 25). The wheel turns: Egypt asks Israel to ensure the flow of gas. Globes. Retrieved October 18, 2015 from http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000904184 (Hebrew).
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Ben-Israel, A. (2010, September 23). Development of Tamar gas field commences at a cost of 3 billion US Dollar. Globes. Retrieved May 24, 2016 from http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000590165 (Hebrew).
- Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
- Dilling, L., & Moser, S. C. (2007). Introduction. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Dobbs, R., Pohl, H., Lin, D., Mischke, J., Garemo, N., Hexter, J., et al. (2013). Infrastructure productivity: How to save $1 trillion a year. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/infrastructure/our-insights/infrastructure-productivity.
- Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Gutman, L. (2013, October 15). The state fell asleep during development, the old gas reservoirs depleted and the electricity tariff soared. Calcalist. Retrieved October 18, 2015 from http://www.calcalist.co.il/local/articles/0,7340,L-3614386,00.html (Hebrew).
- Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Higgs, R. (2010). Cumulating policy consequences, frightened overreactions, and the current surge of government’s size, scope, and power. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 33(2), 531–556.Google Scholar
- Israel. High Court of Justice. (2010). Ruling 2293/10 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Leijten, M. (2013). Real-world decision-making on mega-projects: Politics, bias and strategic behaviour. In H. Priemus & B. Van Wee (Eds.), International handbook on mega-projects (pp. 57–82). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perception, affective images, and interpretive communities. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 44–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Interior. (2015). Natural gas—NOP 37/H homepage. Retrieved October 18, 2015 from http://www.moin.gov.il/Subjects/Energy/Pages/tama37-8.aspx (Hebrew).
- Ministry of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources. (2015). The Israeli electricity sector homepage. Retrieved October 20, 2015 from http://energy.gov.il/Subjects/Electricity/Pages/GxmsMniAboutElectricity.aspx. (Hebrew).
- Moser, S. C. (2007). More bad news: The risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 64–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- State Comptroller (2013). Annual report 64a for the year 2013. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Urgent. (2016). In Oxford Online Dictionaries. Retrieved May 26, 2016 from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/urgent.
- Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Zinn, J. O. (2010). Risk as discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 4(2), 106–124.Google Scholar