Advertisement

Policy Sciences

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 81–102 | Cite as

Deadly divide: Malawi’s policy debate on HIV/AIDS and condoms

  • Paul MkandawireEmail author
  • Isaac N. Luginaah
  • Rachel Bezner-Kerr
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of condom policymaking in Malawi by analyzing debates, which took place in the Malawi National Assembly between the year 2000 and 2004. Using content analysis and key informant interviews, and situating the overall discussion within policy and science literature, we examine how scientific evidence is being applied in the policymaking process as it relates to the place of condoms within the context of HIV/AIDS prevention. The study not only shows the extent to which the policymaking process on condoms in Malawi largely embodies a tendency to blur the conventional divide between science and politics, but also demonstrates why controversy around condoms still persists at the highest level of government in a country with one of the highest HIV prevalence rates in the world. It was found that even when people are dying, consensus in HIV/AIDS policymaking can be difficult to achieve in a policy climate characterized by a binary perspective to social problems, and where different actors compete for control over the policy terrain. The paper makes recommendations that may be helpful in facilitating a more inclusive HIV/AIDS policymaking process in Malawi.

Keywords

Condoms HIV/AIDS Malawi Science Content analysis Policy sciences National Assembly 

References

  1. Aronson, N. (1984). Science and claims-making activity: Implications for social problems research. In J. W. Schneider & J. I. Kitsuse (Eds.), Studies in the sociology of social problems (pp. 1–30). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, C. (1975). Government service in Malawi 1891–1974. Journal of History of Medicine, 20(3), 296–311.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1980). The social construction of reality. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  4. Beverwijk, J., Goedegebuure, L., & Huisman, J. (2008). Policy change in nascent subsystems: Mozambican higher education policy 1993–2003. Policy Sciences, 41(4), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryceson, D., & Fonseca, J. (2006). Risking death for survival: Peasant responses to hunger and HIV/AIDS in Malawi. World Development, 34(8), 1666–2006.Google Scholar
  6. Chimbiri, A. (2007). The condom is an ‘intruder’ in marriage: Evidence from rural Malawi. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1102–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, T. (2003). Globalization, global health, and access to healthcare. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 18, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Waal, A., & Whitehead, A. (2003). ‘New Variant Famine’: AIDS and food crisis in Southern Africa. The Lancet, 263, 1234–1237.Google Scholar
  9. Drake, A. (1976). Illness, ritual and social relations among the Chewa of Central Africa. PhD Thesis, Duke University.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, W. (1981). Public policy analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Englund, H., & Mapanje, J. (2001). Democracy of chameleons; Politics and culture in the New Malawi. Blantyre: CLAIM.Google Scholar
  12. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Garvin, G., & Eyles, J. (1997). The sun safety metanarrative: Translating science into public health discourse. Policy Sciences, 30, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gould, P. (1993). The slow plague: The geography of the AIDS pandemic. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Graffy, E. (2008). Meeting the challenges of policy-relevant science: Bridging theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1087–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haraway, D. (1999). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and privilege of partial perspective. In J. Agnew, D. Livingstone, & A. Rogers (Eds.), Human geography: An essential anthology (pp. 114–123). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, K. (1991). Between science and politics: Assessing the risks of dioxins in Canada and the United States. Policy Sciences, 24, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hearst, N., & Chen, S. (2004). Condom promotion for AIDS prevention in the developing world: Is it working? Studies in Family Planning, 35, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howland, D. (2006). Good press, bad press: A 25-year comparison of arguments and trends in American news coverage of climate change and the ozone hole. Ph. D. Thesis, The University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  20. Howland, D., Larsen, M., & Prelli, J. (2006). Merging content analysis and the policy sciences: A system to discern policy specific trends from news media reports. Policy Sciences, 39, 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jasanoff, S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17, 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jasanoff, S. (1994). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jasanoff, S. (2007). Technologies of humility, Nature, 33. Google Scholar
  24. Jay, N. (1981). Gender and dichotomy. Feminist Studies, 7, 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalipeni, E., Craddock, S., Oppong, J., & Ghosh, J. (2004). HIV and AIDS in Africa: Beyond epidemiology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Kalipeni, E., & Ghosh, J. (2007). Concern and practice among men about HIV/AIDS in low socioeconomic income areas of Lilongwe, Malawi. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1116–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of the policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  30. Leach, M. (2007). Accommodating dissent. Nature, 450, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Wynne, B. (2005). Introduction: Science, citizenship and globalization. In M. Leach, I. Scoones, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement (pp. 3–14). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  32. Lubchenco, J. (1998). Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science, 279, 491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luginaah, I., Yiridoe, E., & Taabazuing, M. (2005). From mandatory to voluntary testing: Balancing human rights, religious and cultural values, and HIV prevention in Ghana. Social Science and Medicine, 61(8), 1689–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lwanda, J. (1993). Kamuzu Banda of Malawi. Glasgow: Dudu Nsomba Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Lwanda, J. (2002). Politics, culture and medicine in Malawi: Historical continuities and ruptures with special reference to HIV/AIDS. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  36. Malawi Government. (2002). Malawi poverty reduction strategy. Lilongwe: Malawi Government.Google Scholar
  37. Malawi Government. (2003). Malawi HIV/AIDS policy. Lilongwe: Malawi Government.Google Scholar
  38. Mandala, E. (1990). Work and control in a peasant economy: History of lower Tchiri Valley in Malawi, 1859-1960. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  39. Maurizio, M., Kelaghan, J., Lynn, A., Harland, A., Michael, F., Edward, H., et al. (1999). Mechanical failure of latex condoms in a cohort of women at high STD risk. Journal of American Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 26(8), 450–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore, A., & Oppong, J. (2007). Sexual risky behavior among people living with HIV/AIDS in Togo. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1057–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moto, F. (2004). Towards a study of the lexicon of sex and HIV/AIDS. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 13(3), 343–362.Google Scholar
  42. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Neuman, W. L. (2006). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Person.Google Scholar
  44. O’Brien, M. (1981). The politics of representation. Boston: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
  45. Ozawa, C., & Susskind, L. (1985). Mediating science-intensive disputes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peltzer, K. (1987). Some contributions of traditional healing practices towards psychosocial healthcare in Malawi, Eschborn b. Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  47. Phoebe, K., Kamya, M., Kamya, S., Chen, S., McFarland, W., & Hearst, N. (2005). Increasing condom use without reducing HIV risk: Results of a controlled community trial in Uganda. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 40(1), 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Popper, K. (1989). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  49. Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rushefsky, M. (1986). Making cancer policy. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sabatier, P. A. (1987). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sarewitz, D., & Pielke, R. (1999). Prediction in science and policy. Technology in Society, 21, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schneider, H. (2002). On the fault-line: The politics of AIDS in policy in contemporary South Africa. African Studies, 6(1), 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schoffeleers, J. (1999). The AIDS pandemic, the Prophet Billy Chinsupe and the democratization process in Malawi. Journal of Religion in Africa, 29(4), 406–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sprague, J., & Zimmerman, M. (2004). Overcoming dualisms: A feminist agenda for sociological methodology. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice (pp. 39–59). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Stone, J., Vittinghoff, E., Douglas, J., Mayer, H., Celum, L., Gross, M., et al. (1999). Correlates of condom failure in a sexually active cohort of men who have sex with men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 20(5), 495–501.Google Scholar
  57. Torgerson, D. (1986). Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 19, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. UNIAIDS (2008). Report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS.Google Scholar
  59. U.S. General Accounting Office (1996). Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and analyzing written material. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  60. van den Hove, S. (2007). A rationale for science-policy interfaces. Futures, 39, 807–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weller, S., & Davis, K. (2003). Condom effectiveness in reducing HIV transmission, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software.Google Scholar
  62. Woodward, G., & Denton, R. (2000). Persuasion and influence in American life. Illinois: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  63. World Development Movement (2002). Structural damage: The causes and consequences of Malawi food crisis report: London.Google Scholar
  64. Wynne, B. (1984). The institutional context of science, models, and policy: The IIASA energy study. Policy Sciences, 17(3), 277–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Mkandawire
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isaac N. Luginaah
    • 1
  • Rachel Bezner-Kerr
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations