Advertisement

Policy Sciences

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 95–98 | Cite as

Roger A. Pielke, Jr., The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics

Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007, 188 pp
  • Kevin Currey
  • Susan G. Clark
Article

Decision processes in modern society are “deeply permeated” by scientists (Lasswell 1971, p. 125; Brunner and Ascher 1992). Scientists publish research, serve on panels, testify before legislatures and in courts, and carry out other activities with policy significance. In all of these activities scientists are participating in policy processes, but they do so using different strategies, in pursuit of different goals, and with different degrees of self-awareness and effect. In The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Roger Pielke Jr. offers a way to sort through the complicated relationships between scientists and decision making. His perceptive, clearly worded, and engaging book offers both important academic insights and a model of professional practice for anyone wishing to engage effectively with politics and policy.

Pielke explicitly clarifies his goal at the outset of the book: he intends to help scientists understand the roles they can choose in a...

References

  1. Brown, M. B. (2008). Review of Roger S. Pielke, Jr., The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Minerva, 46, 485–489. doi: 10.1007/s11024-008-9106-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunner, R. D. (1991). The policy movement as a policy problem. Policy Sciences, 24, 65–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00146465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunner, R. D. (2008). The policy scientist of democracy revisited. Policy Sciences, 41, 3–19. doi: 10.1007/s11077-007-9042-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunner, R. D., & Ascher, W. (1992). Science and social responsibility. Policy Sciences, 25, 295–331. doi: 10.1007/BF00138787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CNN. (2009). Obama moves to separate politics and science. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/09/obama.science/index.html. Accessed on 18 March 2009.
  6. Jasanoff, S. (2008). Speaking honestly to power. Review of the honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics, by Roger A. Pielke, Jr. American Scientist, 96(3), 240–243.Google Scholar
  7. Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1, 3–14. doi: 10.1007/BF00145189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  9. Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society: A framework for political inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence for a free s ociety: Studies in law, science and policy. New Haven: New Haven Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lomborg, B. (2001). The skeptical environmentalist: Measuring the real state of the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pielke, R. A., Jr. (2004). What future for policy sciences? Policy Sciences, 37, 209–225. doi: 10.1007/s11077-005-6181-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosenberg, A. A. (2007). Four ways to take the policy plunge: How should researchers best interact with policy-makers for maximum benefit to society? Nature, 448, 867. doi: 10.1038/448867a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Skolnikoff, E. B. (2008). Review of The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics, by Roger A. Pielke, Jr. Review of Policy Research, 25, 71–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Institution for Social and Policy StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations