Policy Sciences

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 21–32 | Cite as

Revisiting Lasswell

Article

Abstract

This article continues the line of argument and historical interpretation we offered in “The Policy Scientist of Democracy: The Discipline of Harold D. Lasswell” by way of a response to Ronald Brunner’s “The Policy Scientist of Democracy Revisited.” Problems regarding Lasswell’s capacious vision of the policy scientist and vagaries surrounding “democracy,” do not diminish the importance of the questions Lasswell asked and left as his legacy to the discipline of political science. We here supply further evidence for our historical interpretation of Lasswell and sketch what sort of “policy scientist of democracy” fits our times and the current state of the discipline of political science.

Keywords

Lasswell Democracy Policy sciences 

References

  1. Brodbeck, A. J. (1969). Scientific heroism from a standpoint within social psychology. In A. A. Rogow (Ed.), Politics, personality, and social science in the twentieth century: Essays in honor of Harold D. Lasswell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brunner, R. D. (2000). Extreme events and the policy sciences. Extreme events: Developing a research agenda for the 21 st century, Conference for the National Science Foundation. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  3. Brunner, R. D. (2007). The policy scientist of democracy revisited. Policy Sciences, doi: 10.1007/s11077-007-9042-y
  4. Crow, J. A. (1992). The epic of Latin America (4th ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Doughty, P. L. (2004). Review of Stein. Deconstructing Development Discourse. American Ethnologist, 31(November).Google Scholar
  6. Easton, D. (1950). Harold Lasswell: Policy scientist for a democratic society. Journal of Politics, 12 (August), 450–477.Google Scholar
  7. Farr, J., Hacker J. S., & Kazee, N. (2006). The policy scientist of democracy: The discipline of Harold D. Lasswell. American Political Science Review, 100(November), 579–587.Google Scholar
  8. Gewirth, A. (1949). Political power and democratic psychiatry. Ethics, 59(January), 136–142.Google Scholar
  9. Holmberg, A. (1966). Vicos: Método y Práctica de la Antropología Aplicada. Lima: Editorial Etudios Andinos.Google Scholar
  10. Lasswell, H D. (1927). The theory of political propaganda. American Political Science Review, 21(August), 627–631.Google Scholar
  11. Lasswell, H. D. (1928). The function of the propagandist. Ethics, 38, 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lasswell, H. D. (1930). Psychopathology and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lasswell, H. D. (1934). Propaganda. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, first edition, 12, 521–527.Google Scholar
  14. Lasswell, H. D. (1941). Democracy through public opinion. Menasha, WI: Banta Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The political science of science: An inquiry into the possible reconciliation of mastery and freedom. American Political Science Review, 50(December), 961–979.Google Scholar
  16. Lasswell, H. D. (1963). The future of political science. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Lasswell, H. D. (1965). The emerging policy sciences of development: The Vicos Case. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(March), 28–33.Google Scholar
  18. Lasswell Papers, Manuscripts and Archives, Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University. MSS 1043.Google Scholar
  19. Merelman, R. M. (1981). Harold D. Lasswell’s political world: Weak tea for hard times. British Journal of Political Science, 11(October), 471–497.Google Scholar
  20. Oakeshott, M. (1948). Review of Lasswell. The Analysis of Political Behavior. The Cambridge Journal, 1(February), 326–328.Google Scholar
  21. Pielke, R. A. (2004). What future for the policy sciences? Policy Sciences, 37(3–4), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ross, E. B. (2006). Vicos as cold war strategy: Anthropology, peasants, and community development. Anthropology in Action, 12(October), 21–33.Google Scholar
  23. Rubenstein, R., & Laswell, H. D. (1966). The sharing of power in a psychiatric hospital. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Stein, W. W. (2003). Deconstructing development discourse in Peru: A meta-ethnography of the modernity project at Vicos. University Press of America.Google Scholar
  25. Wolpert, J. F. (1949). Review of Lasswell. Language of Politics. Ethics, 60(October), 69–71.Google Scholar
  26. Zapata, G. (2006). Memories of Vicos. On-line translation of Memorias de Vicos. Historia Antropología Y Fuentes Orales, 3, 1–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations