Designing property rights for water: mediating market, government, and corporation failures
- First Online:
Recent decades have seen an acceleration in public concern about the allocation of increasingly scarce water supplies. There are many reasons for this concern, such as growth in urban populations. In this article, we focus on how surface water’s special qualities (the combination of spillovers, rent-seeking behavior, and common pool resources) complicate the assignment of property rights in any legal framework. These characteristics make specific market structures necessary in order to efficiently allocate rights. The state usually designs those structures. Yet, just like markets can fail, so can governments fail to effectively allocate those rights. So designers often turn to quasi-judicial conservancy boards as a second-best solution. We argue that those boards may themselves fail through a form of “corporation failure.” We address these three types of failures, and offer an analysis of two cases that suggests that the likelihood conservancy boards will suffer from corporate failure depends on the actions of the boards and outside stakeholders (like governments).
KeywordsWater rights Institutional design Second best solutions Market failure Government failure Corporation failure Double moral hazard
- “About IID.” 2007. Imperial Irrigation Water District Website. Available at: http://www.iid.com/Sub.php?pid=702.
- Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1974). Production, information costs and economic organization. In E. Grundtvig, & G. Furubotn (Eds.), The economics of property rights. Cambridge, MA: Bailinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Anderson, T. L. (1983a). Water crisis: Ending the policy drought. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
- Anderson, T. L. (1983b). The water crisis and the new resource economics. In T. L. Anderson (Ed.), Water rights: Scarce resource allocation, bureaucracy, and the environment. Cambridge, MA: Bailinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Bower, B. T. (1965). Some important research problems in the water resources field. Natural Resources Journal, 5, 286–297.Google Scholar
- Cheung, S. (1974). The structure of a contract and the theory of a non-exclusive resource. In E. Grundtvig, & G. Furubotn (Eds.), The economics of property rights. Cambridge, MA: Bailinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. (1952). Resource conservation: Economics and policies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. (1967). Water economics: Relations to law and policy. In R. E. Clark (Ed.), Waters and water rights: A treatise on the law of waters and allied problems. (Vol. I). Indianapolis, IN: The Allen Smith Company.Google Scholar
- Cuzan, A. (1983). Appropriators versus expropriators. In T. L. Anderson (Ed.), Water rights: Scarce resource allocation, bureaucracy, and the environment. Cambridge, MA: Bailinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Datta-Chaudhuri, M. (1990). Market failure and government failure. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 25–39.Google Scholar
- Demsetz, H. (1974). Toward a theory of property rights. In E. Grundtvig, & G. Furubotn (Eds.), The economics of property rights. Cambridge, MA: Bailinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Donahue, J. D. (1991). Efficiency, rent-seeking, and privatization: Ten propositions. In P. Davidson, & J. A. Kregel (Eds.), Economic problems of the 1990s. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Eswaren, M., & Kotwal, A. (1985). A theory of contractual structure in agriculture. American Economic Review, 73, 352–367.Google Scholar
- Ferry, S. (2004). Environmental law: Examples and explanations. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
- Furbotn, G., Grundtvig, E., & Pejovich, S. (1974). Introduction: The new property rights literature. In E. Grundtvig, & G. Furubotn (Eds.), The economics of property rights. Cambridge, MA: Bailinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Garnsey, M. E. (1962). Welfare economics and resources development. In H. C. Amos, & R. K. Nickle (Eds.), Land and water: Planning for economic growth. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
- General History (2007). Imperial Irrigation District Webpage. Available at: http://www.iid.com/Sub.php?pid=14.
- Haddad, B. M. (2000). Rivers of gold: Designing markets to allocate water in california. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Hartman, L. M., & Seastone, D. A. (1970). Water transfers: Economic efficiency and alternative institutions. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
- Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Hirshleifer, J., DeHaven, J. C., & Milliman, J. W. (1960). Water supply: Economics, technology, and policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Howe, C. W., Alexander, P. K., & Moses, R. J. (1982). The performance of appropriative water rights structures in the western United States during drought. Natural Resources Journal, 22, 379–390.Google Scholar
- Huffman, R. E. (1953). Irrigation development and public water policy. New York, NY: Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
- Kubasek, N. K., & Silverman, G. S. (2005). Environmental law. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
- Miller, G. J. (2000). Above politics: Commitment and efficiency in the design of public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 289–327.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tolley, G. S. (1965). Future economics research on western water resources—with particular reference to California. Natural Resources Journal, 5, 259–285.Google Scholar
- US Geological Survey (1999). Washington State Hydrology. Website of the US Geological Survey. Available at: http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Volcanoes/Washington/Hydrology/description_washington_hydrology.html.
- Washington State Legislature (1997). Chapter 90.80 RCW: Water Conservancy Boards. Available at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=90.80.
- Washington State Department of Ecology (2004). 2004 Report to the Legislature: Water Conservancy Boards. Publication No. 04-11-026. Available at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0411026.pdf.
- Washington State Department of Ecology (2006). 2006 Report to the Legislature: Water Conservancy Boards. Publication No. 06-11-050. Available at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0611050.pdf.
- Washington State Department of Ecology (2007a). Water Conservancy Boards: General Information. Available at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/conservancy_boards/cb-home.html.
- Washington State Department of Ecology (2007b). Water Conservancy Boards Questions and Answers. Available at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/conservancy_boards/cb-q-n-a.html.
- Washington State Department of Ecology (2007c). Washington Water Exchange - Available or Needed. Available at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/ws/drt_wtrxchng_table.html.
- West Richland, City of, et al. v. Department of Ecology, et al. (2004). State of Washington, Court of Appeals Division III. Docket Number: 22648-4-III. ‘Opinion Information Sheet’. Available at: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=wa&vol=2004_app/22648.4maj&invol=3.
- Wiel, S. C. (1911). Water rights in the western United States. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Bancroft-Whitney Company.Google Scholar
- Wolf, C., Jr. (1979). A theory of nonmarket failure: Framework for implementation analysis. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 107–139.Google Scholar