Policy Sciences

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 233–248

Investments in Global Warming Mitigation: The Case of “Activities Implemented Jointly”

  • Nives Dolšak
  • Maureen Dunn
Original Article


This paper examines bilateral cooperation between developed countries (home country) and developing countries (host country) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to enhance carbon dioxide sinks. With the home-host country pair as the unit of analysis, our logistic regression model examines 158 Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) investment projects from 1993 until 2002 across 2541 country-pairs. Because the marginal costs of reducing emissions may be lower in developing countries, the AIJ projects served as a policy laboratory to assess whether such investments might be advantageous to both countries in the event future regimes allowed emission credits from such bilateral projects. Instead of investing in home countries where maximum pollution reductions (or carbon sequestration) might be possible, home countries invest in locations where they can conduct their policy experiments at low transaction costs. Prior trade and aid relationships were used as a proxy. Regarding energy projects, location decisions are driven by home countries’ desire to reduce air pollution that they receive from abroad. Geography – proximity of a host country to a home country – in interaction with host country's coal production, is a very important driver of location decision in AIJ energy sector projects. Location of sequestration projects is impacted by the host country's potential for avoiding deforestation as well as by previous aid and trade patterns between a home and a host country. Proximity is not important in this case.


Global climate change policy Global warming policy International environmental policy International environmental regimes International cooperation Global commons Energy policy Environmental policy Activities implemented jointly International regimes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barrett, K., Seland, Ø., Foss, A., Mylona, S., Sandnes, H., Styve, H., & Tarrasón L. (1995). European Transboundary Acidifying Air Pollution. EMEP/MSC-W Report 1/95, July 1995.Google Scholar
  2. Berge, E., Bartnicki, J., Olendrzynski, K., & Tsyro, S.G. (1999). Long-term Trends in Emissions and Transboundary Transport of Acidifying Air Pollution in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 57, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dolšak, N. (2001) Mitigating Global Climate Change: Why are Some Countries More Committed Than Others?. Policy Studies Journal, 29, 414–436.Google Scholar
  4. European Environment Agency. (2002). Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  5. Hardin, G. (1968). Tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hasenauer, H., Nemani, R.R., Schadauer, K., & Running, S.W. (1999). Forest Growth Response to Changing Climate Between 1961 and 1990 in Austria. Forest Ecology and Management, 122, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaegle, L. (2005) University of Washington. Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  8. Jaeglé L., Jaffe, D.A., Price, H.U., Weiss-Penzias, P., Palmer, P.I., Evans, M.J., Jacob, D.J., & Bey, I. (2003). Sources and budgets for CO and O3 in the Northeast Pacific During the spring of 2001: results from the PHOBEA-II Experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 8802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaffe D.A., et al. (1999). Transport of Asian Air Pollution to North America. Geophysical Research Letters, 26, 711–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. LaMarche Jr. V.C., Graybill, D.A., Fritts, H.C., & Rose, M.R. (1984). Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Tree Ring Evidence for Growth Enhancement in Natural Vegetation. Science, 223, 1019–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Long, S.J. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Masera, O.R., Garza-Caligaris, J.F., Kanninen, M., Karjalainen, T., Liski, J., & Nabuurs, G.J., Pussinen, A., De Jong, B.H.J., & Mohren, G.M.J. (2003). Modeling Carbon Sequestration in Afforestation, Agroforestry and Forest Management Projects: the CO2FIX V.2 aapproach. Ecological Modeling, 164, 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Michaelowa, A. (1998) Joint Implementation-The Baseline Issue: Economic and Political Aspects. Global Environmental Change, 8, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Michaelowa, A. (2002). The AIJ Pilot Phase as Laboratory for CDM and JI. International Journal Global Environmental Issues, 2, 260–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miles, E.L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjaerseth, J.B., & Carlin, E. M. (2002). Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Niles, J.O. (2002). Potential Carbon Mitigation and Income in Developing Countries from Changes in Use and Management of Agricultural Forest Lands. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360, 1621–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. OECD. (2001). International Trade by Commodity Statistics., Database Edition, http://new.sourceoecd.org/vl $=$ 8591365/cl $=$ 13/nw $=$ 1/rpsv/statistic/s15_about.htm?jnlissn $=$ 16081218. Accessed on July 16, 2005.
  18. OECD. (2005). Destination of Official Development Assistance and Official Aid – Disbursements. in International Development Statistics (IDS). Table 2a, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/50/17/5037721.htm. Accessed on July 29, 2005
  19. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P.C., Stonich, S., & Weber, E.U., eds. (2001). The Drama of the Commons. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ott, H. E. (1998). Operationalizing ‘Joint Implementation’ Organizational and Institutional Aspects of a New Instrument in International Climate Policy. Global Environmental Change, 8, 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oye, K., ed. (1986). Cooperation under anarchy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Powell, M., Lile, R., & Toman, M. (1997). Assessing the Constraints and Opportunities for Private-Sector Participation in Activities Implemented Jointly: Two Case Studies from the US Initiative for Joint Implementation. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  24. Reforest the Tropics. Inc. (2006). http://ji.unfccc.int/CallForInputs/BaselineSettingMonitoring/HBarres/ Description.doc. Accessed on March 20, 2006.
  25. Springer, U. (2003). Can the Risks of the Kyoto Mechanisms be Reduced Through Portfolio Diversification? Evidence from the Swedish AIJ Project. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. United Nations Environment Program. (2005). Global Environment Outlook, Forest and Woodland Percent of Land Area Table, http://geodata.grid.unep.ch/results.php. Accessed on August, 6, 2005.
  27. UNFCCC. (1999). ‘Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase’, FCCC/SB/ 1995/5/Add.1 14. GE. 99. http://www.ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/unfccc2/pdfs/unfccc.int/resource/docs/1999/sb/05a01.pdf. Accessed on February 15, 2006.
  28. UNFCCC. (2002a). Uniform Reporting Format: Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase: Jelgava Energy Efficiency. http://unfccc.int/kyoto_mechanisms/aij/activities_implemented_jointly/items/1779.php Accessed on November 10, 2005.
  29. UNFCCC. (2002b). Uniform Reporting Format: Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase: The Model Project for Energy Conservation in Electric Furnace used for Ferro-Alloy Refining. http://unfccc.int/kyoto_mechanisms/aij/activities_implemented_jointly/items/1846.php Accessed on November 10, 2005.
  30. UNFCCC. (2002c). Uniform Reporting Format: Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase: City of Decin: Fuel Switching for District Heating. http://unfccc.int/kyoto_mechanisms/aij/activities_implemented_jointly/items/1730.php. Accessed on November 10, 2005.
  31. UNFCCC. (2002d). Activities Implemented Jointly. http://unfccc.int/kyoto_mechanisms/aij/activities_implem- ented_jointly/items/2094.php. Accessed on September 6, 2005.
  32. UNFCCC. (2005). Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase: United Nations Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/kyoto_mechanisms/aij/activities_implemented_jointly/items/2307.php. Accessed on November 10, 2005.
  33. United States Department of Agriculture. Great Circle Distances Between Capital Cities. http://www.wcrl.ars.usda. gov/cec/java/capitals.htm Accessed on March 7, 2006.
  34. Victor, D. (2001). The Collapse of the kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming. Princeton: University PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Wooldridge, J.M. (2003). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Second edition. Stamford, CT: Thomson.Google Scholar
  36. World Bank Group (2005). World Development Indicators, http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/Accessed on August 20, 2005.
  37. Young, O., ed. (1999). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nives Dolšak
    • 1
  • Maureen Dunn
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Washington-BothellWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations