Policy Sciences

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 183–202 | Cite as

De-centering environmental governance: A short history and analysis of democratic processes in the forest sector of Alberta, Canada

  • John R. Parkins


This paper describes the emergence of a de-centered and privatized mode of governance in the Canadian forest sector. Using deliberative democratic theory as a descriptive foundation, it explores two key social facts that are arguably central to any historical analysis of this trend. First, increasing cultural pluralism challenges contemporary society to create new institutional arrangements that can incorporate a much larger, and often contested, array of public values into decision-making processes. Second, as management systems become more complex and science-driven, decision makers are finding it increasingly difficult to resolve issues of uncertainty and conflicting scientific evidence. De-centered forms of public participation provide important opportunities for government and industry to overcome these contemporary challenges, but certain side effects are also apparent. From the steering tactics of sponsoring agencies and corporations to the “ghettoizing” of environmental discourses, several implications are discussed.


Environmental governance Deliberative democracy Public participation Small groups Public sphere Forest policy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aberta Council for Sustainable Communities and the Environment (ACSCE). (2003). Alberta Forest Community Coalition (AFCC). Home Page. Accessible at http://www.forestcommunity.ca/.
  2. Aberta Environmental Protection. (1992). Special Places 2000: Alberta’s Natural Heritage. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Environmental Protection.Google Scholar
  3. Aberta Environment. (2002). Integrated Resource Management in Alberta – A Thumbnail History. Accessible at http://www3.gov.ab.ca/env/irm/docs/history.pdf.
  4. Aberta Wilderness Association (AWA). (2000). Alberta Falls Short of its Commitments. Accessible at http://albertawilderness.ca/News/NR2000/NR000705/NR000705_2.pdf.
  5. Auld, G., & Bull, G. Q. (2003). The institutional design of forest certification standards initiatives and its influence on the role of science: The case of forest genetic resources. Journal of Environmental Management 69:, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy and practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the future.Google Scholar
  8. Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brunner, R. D., Colburn, C. H., Cromley, C. M., Klein, R. A., & Olson, E. A. (2002). Finding common ground: Governance and natural resources in the American West. New Haven, CT: Yale.Google Scholar
  10. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM). (1995). Defining sustainable forest management: a Canadian approach to criteria and indicators. Ottawa: CCFM C&I Secretariat, natural resources Canada.Google Scholar
  11. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM). (2003). Defining sustainable forest management in Canada. Ottawa: criteria and indicators 2003. CCFM C&I Secretariat, Natural Resources Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2003). Z809-02. Sustainable forest management: requirements and guidance. Accessible at http://www.csa.ca/%5Crepository%5Cgroup%5CZ809-02july.pdf.
  13. Canadian Sustainable Forestry Certification Coalition (CSFCC) (2005). Certification intentions in Canada. Accessible at http://www.sfms.com/status.htm#intentions.
  14. Carrow, R. (1999). Canada’s model forest program: Challenges for phase II. The forestry chronicle, 75, 73–80.Google Scholar
  15. Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governanc, 15, 503–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cashore, B., & Vertinsky, I. (2000). Policy networks and firm behaviour: governance systems and firm responses to external demands for sustainable forest management. Policy sciences, 33, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cashore, B., Auld, G., & Newsom, D. (2003). Governing through markets: forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Christiansen-Ruffman, L., & Stuart, B. (1977). Actors and processes in citizen participation: negative aspects of reliance on professionals. in B. Sadler, ed., Involvement and environment (Volume 1). Edmonton, AB: Environment Council of Alberta.Google Scholar
  19. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Davidson, D. J., & MacKendrick, N. A. (2004). All dressed up with nowhere to go: the discourse of ecological modernization in Alberta. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 41, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dorcey, A. H. J., & McDaniels, T. (2001). Great expectations, mixed results: trends in citizen involvement in canadian environmental governance. in E. A. Parson, ed., Governing the environment: persistent challenges, uncertain innovations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Drushka, K. (2003). Canada’s forests: a history. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dryzek, J., & Torgerson, D. (1993). Editorial: Democracy and the policy sciences: a progress report. Policy Sciences, 26, 127–137.Google Scholar
  24. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Eisner, M. A. (2004). Corporate environmentalism, regulatory reform, and industry self-regulation: toward genuine regulatory reinvention in the united states. Governance, 17, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fine, G. A., & Harrington, B. (2004). Tiny publics: small groups and civil society. Sociological Theory, 22, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Durham, SC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Forester, J., ed. (1985). Critical Theory and Public Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun, ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: a Theory of Transactive Planning. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  31. Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1985). Three types of risk assessment. in C. Whipple and V. T. Covello, eds., Risk Analysis in the Private Sector. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Emergent complex systems. Futures 26, 568–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gary, G. J., Enzer, M. J., & Kusel, J. eds. (2001). Understanding community-based forest ecosystem management. New York: Hawarth Press.Google Scholar
  34. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hibbard, M., & Madsen, J. (2003). Environmental resistance to place-based collaboration in the U.S. west. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaga, M. (2002). Provincial regulation of natural resource exploitation. Canada-United States Law Journal 28, 357–368.Google Scholar
  40. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lash, J. (2002). People and ecosystems: the fraying web of life. Isuma, 3, 20–24.Google Scholar
  42. Lazar, A. (2003). The canadian forest products industry’s emerging industrial model of sustainability. The Forestry Chronicle, 79, 769–773.Google Scholar
  43. Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R., & Waters, C. (1993). Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Science, 5104, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCloskey, M. (1996). The skeptics: collaboration has its limits. High Country News 28.Google Scholar
  45. McFarlane, B. L., & Boxall, P. C. (2000). Forest values and attitudes of the public, environmentalists, professional foresters, and members of public advisory groups in Alberta. Information Report NOR-X-37. Edmonton, AB: Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre.Google Scholar
  46. McKenzie, J. I. (2002). Environmental Politics in Canada: managing the commons into the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Murphy, P. (1992). Forestry Issues in Canada. Redovisning av seminarium den 11 maj 1992. Anordnat av Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  48. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  49. Paehlke, R. (2000). Environmentalism in one country: Canadian environmental policy in an era of globalization. Policy Studies Journal, 28, 160–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parkins, J. (2002). Forest management and advisory groups in Alberta: an empirical critique of an emergent public sphere. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27, 163–184.Google Scholar
  51. Parson, E. A. (2001). Environmental trends: a challenge to canadian governance. In E. A. Parson, ed., Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pelletier, D., Kraak, V., McCullum, C. Uusitalo, U., & Rich, R. (1999). The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical study from New York’s north country. Policy Sciences, 32, 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pellizzoni, L. (2003). Uncertainty and participatory democracy. Environmental Values, 12, 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pratt, L., & Urquhart, I. (1994). The last great forest: Japanese multinationals and Alberta’s Northern forests. Edmonton, AB: NeWest Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ribot, J. C. (2002). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: institutionalizing popular participation. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  56. Richardson, M., Sherman, J. & Gismondi, M. (1993). Winning back the words: confronting experts in an environmental public hearing. Toronto: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rousseau, A. H. (1996). Consensus-building and sustainable forest management in Canada. Stockholm, Sweden: intergovernmental workshop on sustainable forestry and land use: the process of consensus Building (14–18 October).Google Scholar
  58. Sadler, B. (1977). ‘Basic issues in public participation: a background perspective’, in B. Sadler, ed., Involvement and Environment (Volume 1). Edmonton, AB: Environment Council of Alberta.Google Scholar
  59. Schindler, D. W. (1998). A dim future for boreal waters and landscapes. Bioscience, 48, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schneider, R. R. (2001). Whatever happened to the Alberta forest conservation strategy? Encompass, 5, 9–13.Google Scholar
  61. Schneider, R. R. (2002). A history of industrial development in Northern Alberta: 1900–2000. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Centre for Boreal Studies.Google Scholar
  62. Senate Subcommittee on the Boreal Forest. (1999). Competing realities: the boreal forest at risk. Ottawa, ON: Subcommittee on the Boreal Forest of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
  63. Stefanick, L., & Wells, K. (2000). Alberta’s special places 2000: conservation, conflict, and the castle-crown wilderness. in S. Bocking, ed., Biodiversity in Canada: Ecology, Ideas and Action. Perterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  64. Timoney, K., & Lee, P. (2001). Environmental management in resource-rich Alberta, Canada: first world jurisdiction, third world analogue? Journal of Environmental Management, 63, 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Torgerson, D. (1999). The promise of green politics: environmentalism and the public sphere. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Urquhart, I. (2001). New players, same game? Managing the boreal forest on Canada’s prairies. in M. Howlett, ed., Canadian forest policy: adapting to change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  67. van Vliet, M. (1993). Environmental regulation in business: options and constraints for communicative governance. in J. Kooiman, ed., Modern Governance: new Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
  69. World Bank. (1996). The world bank participation sourcebook. Accessible at http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/sourcebook/sbhome.htm.
  70. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • John R. Parkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Science Research GroupCanadian Forest ServiceEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations