Policy Sciences

, Volume 37, Issue 3–4, pp 261–276 | Cite as

Enhancing public participation through narrative analysis

  • Greg HamptonEmail author


Effective public participation requires methods of policy analysis that can accommodate the discourse of the participants' opinions, preferences and values. This requires analytic methods that retain and convey the social and cultural contexts of the discourse of culturally diverse communities. Narrative policy analysis can incorporate cultural and social diversity within the process of analysing and presenting public preferences. Labov's evaluation model is used as a basis for describing how narrative analysis can be used to identify and present public preferences within a participation process. The value of this approach is demonstrated with reference to a participation process conducted on environmental quality.


Evaluation Model Economic Policy Environmental Quality Cultural Context Policy Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boje, D. M. (1991). ‘The storytelling organisation: A study of story performance in an office supply firm,’ Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 106–126.Google Scholar
  2. Bridgman, T. and D. Barry (2002). ‘Regulation is evil: An application of narrative policy analysis,’ Policy Sciences 35: 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. (1991). ‘The narrative construction of reality,’ Critical Inquiry 18: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cortazzi, M. (1991). Primary Teaching, How It Is – A Narrative Account. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  5. Cortazzi, M. (1993). Narrative Analysis. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cvetkovich, G. and T. C. Earle (1992). ‘Environmental hazards and the public,’ Journal of Social Issues48: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darokin, D. J. and J. Schulkin (1994). ‘Environmental justice: co-evolution of environmental concerns and social justice,’ The Environmentalist14: 121–129.Google Scholar
  8. deLeon, P. (1994). ‘Reinventing the policy sciences – 3 steps back to the future,’ Policy Sciences 27: 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Environment Protection Authority, New South Wales (1994). Benchmark Study on Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, Skills and Behaviour in New South Wales. Sydney: Environment Protection Authority.Google Scholar
  10. Environment Protection Authority, New South Wales (1997a). State of Environment Report.
  11. Environment Protection Authority, New South Wales (1997b). State of Environment Report.
  12. Environment Protection Authority, New South Wales (2002). Port Kembla Copper Fined for Pollution.
  13. Falk, J., C. Fox, G. Hampton and K. Parker (1994). Review of Greenhouse Information Material. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Sports, Environment and Tourism.Google Scholar
  14. Falk, J., G. Hampton and K. Parker (1993). Illawarra Community Environmental Survey. Sydney: NSW Environment Protection Authority.Google Scholar
  15. Garvin, T., and J. Eyles (1997). ‘The sun safety metanarrative: Translating science into public health discourse,’. Policy Sciences 30: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hampton, G. R. (1999). ‘Environmental equity and public participation,’ Policy Sciences32: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hampton, G. R. and A. Hodgkinson (1996). Regional Environmental Employment Strategy. Illawarra Region of Councils.Google Scholar
  18. Institute for Participatory Planning. (1981). Citizen Participation Handbook for Public Officials and Others Serving the Public. Laramie, WY: Author.Google Scholar
  19. International Association for Public Participation (1997). ‘Core values for the practice of public participation,’ The Practitioner April, 10.Google Scholar
  20. Jordan, M. P. (1984). Rhetoric of Everyday English Texts. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, T. J. (1986). ‘Narrative structure of policy analysis,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5: 761–788.Google Scholar
  22. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Labov, W. (1972). ‘The transformation of experience in narrative syntax,’ in W. Labov, ed., Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, pp. 352–396.Google Scholar
  24. LIST (1997). Illawarra Leukaemia Cluster Investigation Report, Prepared by the Leukaemia Investigation Steering Committee, for the Illawarra Area Health Service and the NSW Health Department. Illawarra Public Health Unit, Wollongong.Google Scholar
  25. Mancuso, J. C. (1986). ‘The acquisition and use of narrative grammar structure,’ in T. R. Sarbin, ed., Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Praeger, pp. 91–110.Google Scholar
  26. Mishler, E. G. (1995). ‘Models of narrative analysis: A typology,’ Journal of Narrative and Life History 5: 87–123.Google Scholar
  27. Pelletier, D., V. Kraak, C. McCullum, U. Uusitalo, and R. Rich. (1999). ‘The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical study from New York's North Country,’ Policy Sciences32: 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Polanyi, L. (1985). ‘Conversational story telling,’ in T. A. VanDijk ed., Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Academic, pp. 183–201.Google Scholar
  29. Port Kembla Copper (2002). Newsletter August, 2002.
  30. Potter, J. and M. Wetherell. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Roe, E. M. (1989). ‘Narrative analysis for the policy analyst: A case study of the 1980–1982 medfly controversy in California,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management8: 251–273.Google Scholar
  32. Roe, E. M. (1994). Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sampson, E. E. (1993). ‘Identity politics: Challenges to psychology's understanding,’ American Psychologist48: 1219–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schütz, A. and T. Luckmann (1974). The Structures of the Life World. (translated by R. Zaner and H.T. Engelhardt). Heinemann: London.Google Scholar
  35. Stewart, D. W. and P. Shamdasini (1990). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Newbury Pk: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Ting-Toomey, S. and A. Kurogi (1998). ‘Facework: Competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory,’ International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22: 187–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turner, V. (1980). ‘Social dramas and stories about them,’ Critical Inquiry7: 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Viney, L. L. and L. Bousfield (1991). ‘Narrative analysis: A method of psychosocial research for AIDS-affected people,’ Social Science and Medicine32: 757–765.Google Scholar
  39. Wollongong City Council (1995). Wollongong Profile: A Database for Community Planning. Wollongong: Wollongong City Council.Google Scholar
  40. Workers Inquiry into Wollongong Leukaemia and Cancer Crisis (1997). Cancer and Industrial Pollution : The Findings of the Workers Inquiry into Wollongong Leukaemia and Cancer Crisis, September 9, 1997.Bankstown, N.S.W.: Labour Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning CentreUniversity of WollongongNew South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations