Policy Sciences

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 21–44 | Cite as

The role of the state in voluntary environmental reform: A case study of public land



Conventional environmental reform is characterized by the compliance of firms with direct regulatory pressure from the state. Scholars are now turning their attention to alternative modes of reform where firms proactively improve their operations through the implementation of voluntary environmental strategies (VES). While previous research on VES has typically focused on the manufacturing sector, this study explores challenges to corporate greening in the natural resource extractive sector when strategies are undertaken on public land. Findings from two case study regions in the Canadian province of Alberta suggest that VES undertaken on public land are significantly constrained by certain features of the system of environmental governance and the regulatory regime, particularly the reluctance of the state to be involved as a co-regulator of public land. The importance of solid leadership from the state in environmental reform – including cases of voluntary corporate initiatives – is discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AEP-NRS (Alberta Environmental Protection, Natural Resource Service) (1998). The Final Frontier: Protecting Landscape and Biological Diversity within Alberta's Boreal Forest Natural Region. Edmonton, AB: Government of Alberta.Google Scholar
  2. Alberta Economic Development (2005). The Alberta Economy: Abundance of Natural Resources. Edmonton, AB: Government of Alberta. http://www.alberta-canada.com/economy/energy.cfm.
  3. Alberta Economic Development. (2004). Highlights of the Alberta Economy, 2004. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Economic Development, Policy and Analysis Division.Google Scholar
  4. Alberta Energy (2005). Home Page. Edmonton, AB: Government of Alberta. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/.
  5. Alberta Environment (1997). The Role of Compulsory Industry Monitoring in Alberta's Environmental Regulatory Program. http://www.gov.ab.ca/env/protenf/approvals/factsheets/compuls.html.
  6. Andrews, R. N. L. (1998). ‘Environmental regulation and business “self-regulation’,’ Policy Sciences 31: 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arora, S. and T. N. Cason (1996). ‘Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in the EPA's 33/50 program,’ Land Economics 72: 413–432.Google Scholar
  8. Athanasiou, T. (1996). ‘The age of greenwashing.,’ Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 7(1):1–36.Google Scholar
  9. Banerjee, S. B. (2001a). ‘Corporate environmental strategies and actions,’ Management Decisions 39(1): 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banerjee, S. B. (2001b). ‘Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations,’ Journal of Management Studies 38: 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buysse, K. and A. Verbeke (2003). ‘Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective,’ Strategic Management Journal 24: 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carney, D. and J. Farrington (1998). Natural Resource Management and Institutional Change. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cashore, B. (2002). ‘Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority,’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 15: 503–529.Google Scholar
  14. Cashore, B., G. Auld and D. Newsom (2003). ‘Forest certification (eco-labeling) programs and their policymaking authority: Explaining divergence among North American and European case studies,’ Forest Policy and Economics 5: 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cashore, B. and I. Vertinsky (2000). ‘Policy networks and firm behaviors: Governance systems and firm responses to external demands for sustainable forest management,’ Policy Sciences 33: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christmann, P. (2004). ‘Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization,’ Academy of Management Journal 47: 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance,’ Academy of Management Review 20: 92–117.Google Scholar
  18. Davidson, D. J. and S. Frickel (2004). ‘Understanding environmental governance: A critical review,’ Organization and Environment 17: 471–492.Google Scholar
  19. Delmas, M. A. and A. Terlaak (2001). ‘A framework for analyzing environmental voluntary agreements,’ California Management Review 43(3): 44–63.Google Scholar
  20. Delmas, M. A. (2002). ‘The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective.,’ Policy Sciences 35: 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell. (1983). ‘The iron cage re-visited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.,’ American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.Google Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell, eds. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eisner, M. A. (2004). ‘Corporate environmentalism, regulatory reform, and industry self-regulation: Toward genuine regulatory reinvention in the United States,’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 17: 145–167.Google Scholar
  24. Fisher, D., and W. Freudenburg (2001). ‘Ecological modernization and its critics: Assessing the past and looking toward the future,’ Society and Natural Resources 14: 701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson, R. B. (1999). ‘Questions about a gift horse,’ in R. B. Gibson, ed., Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  26. Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky (1996). ‘Determinants of an environmentally responsive firm,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoberg, G. (1999). ‘The coming revolution in regulating our forests,’ Policy Options December: 53–56.Google Scholar
  28. Hoffman, A. J. (1996). Trends in corporate environmentalism: The chemical and petroleum industries, 1996–1993. Society and Natural Resources 9: 47–64.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). ‘Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry.,’ Academy of Management Journal 42: 351–371.Google Scholar
  30. Hoffman, A. J., H. C. Riley, J. G. Troast Jr. and M. H. Bazerman (2002). ‘Cognitive and institutional barriers to new forms of cooperation on environmental protection,’ American Behavioral Scientist 45: 820–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Khanna, A. and W. R. Q. Anton (2002). ‘Corporate environmental management: Regulatory and market incentives,’ Land Economics 78: 539–558.Google Scholar
  33. Kennett, S. A. and M. M. Ross (1998). In Search of Public Land Law in Alberta. CIRL Occasional Paper 5. Calgary, AB: Canadian Institute of Resources Law.Google Scholar
  34. King, A. and M. Lenox (2002). ‘Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction,’ Management Science 48: 289–299.Google Scholar
  35. Knill, C. and D. Lehmkuhl (2002). ‘Private actors and the state: Internationalization of changing patterns of governance,’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 15: 41–63.Google Scholar
  36. Koontz, T. M., T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. S. Korfmacher, C. Moseley and C. W. Thomas (2004). Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  37. Leroy, P. and J. van Tatenhove (2000). ‘Political modernization theory and environmental politics,’ in G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol and F. H. Buttel, eds., Environment and Global Modernity. London: Sage Studies in International Sociology, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
  38. Levy, D. L. and P. J. Newell (2002). ‘Business strategy and international environmental governance: Toward a neo-Gramscian synthesis,’ Global Environmental Politics 2(4): 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lyon, T. P. and J. W. Maxwell (2003). ‘Self-regulation, taxation and public voluntary environmental agreements,’ Journal of Public Economics 87: 1453–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacCrimmon, G. and T. Marr-Laing (2000). Patchwork Policy, Fragmented Forests: In-Situ Oil Sands, Industrial Development, and the Ecological Integrity of Alberta's Boreal Forest. Drayton Valley. Calgary, AB: Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development.Google Scholar
  41. Maxwell, J. W., T. P. Lyon and S. C. Hackett (2000). ‘Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism,’ Journal of Law and Economics 43: 583–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Moffet, J. and F. Bregha (1999). ‘Non-regulatory environmental measures. What are they and what makes them work?,’ in R. B. Gibson, ed., Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
  44. Mol, A. P. J. (2000). ‘Globalization and environment: Between apocalypse-blindness and ecological modernization,’ in G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol and F. H. Buttel, eds., Environment and Global Modernity. London: Sage Studies in International Sociology, pp. 121–150.Google Scholar
  45. Neuman, L. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  46. Oliver, C. (1991). ‘Strategic responses to institutional processes,’ Academy of Management Review 16:145–179.Google Scholar
  47. Papadakis, E. and R. Grant (2003). ‘The politics of “light handed regulation”: “New” environmental policy instruments in Australia. Environmental Politics 12(1): 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995). ‘Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 97–118.Google Scholar
  49. Prakash, A. (2000). Greening the Firm: The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rivera, J. and P. de Leon (2004). ‘Is greener whiter? Voluntary environmental performance of western ski areas,’ Policy Studies Journal 32: 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roper, J. M. and J. Shapira (2000). Ethnography in Nursing Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Ross, M. M. (2002). Legal and Institutional Responses to Conflicts Involving the Oil and Gas and Forestry Sectors. CIRL Occasional Paper 10. Calgary, AB: Canadian Institute of Resources Law.Google Scholar
  53. Sawyer, M., D. Mayhood, P. Paquet, C. Wallis, R. Thomas, and W. Haskins (1998). Southern East Slopes Cumulative Effects Assessment. Calgary, AB: Hayduke and Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
  54. Schneider, R. (2002). Alternative Futures: Alberta's Boreal Forest at the Crossroads. Edmonton, AB: The Federation of Alberta Naturalists and the Alberta Centre for Boreal Research.Google Scholar
  55. Segerson, K. and T. Miceli (1998). ‘Voluntary environmental agreements: Good or bad news for the environment?,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharma, S. (2000). ‘Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy,’ Academy of Management Journal 43: 681–697.Google Scholar
  57. Shrivastava, P. (1995). ‘The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability,’ Academy of Management Review 20: 936–960.Google Scholar
  58. Sonnenfeld, D. A. and A. P. Mol. (2002). ‘Globalization and the transformation of environmental governance,’ American Behavioral Scientist 45: 1318–1339.Google Scholar
  59. Spaargaren, G. and A. P. Mol (1992). ‘Sociology, the environment and modernity: ecological modernization as a theory of social change,’ Society and Natural Resources 5: 323–344.Google Scholar
  60. Vertinsky, I. B. and. C. Zietsma (1998). Shades of Green: Cognitive Framing and the Dynamics of Corporate Response. Sustainable Forest Management Network Working Paper 1998-13. Edmonton, AB: Sustainable Forest Management Network.Google Scholar
  61. Walton, J. (2000). ‘Should monitoring be compulsory within voluntary environmental agreements?,’ Sustainable Development 8: 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Welch, E. and A. Hibiki (2002). ‘Japanese voluntary environmental agreements: Bargaining power and reciprocity as contributors to effectiveness,’ Policy Sciences 35: 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Winn, M. and L. Angell (2000). ‘Towards a process model of corporate greening,’ Organization Studies 21: 1119–1147.Google Scholar
  64. Winter, S. C. and P. J. May (2001). ‘Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20: 675–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rural EconomyUniversity of AlbertaCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of TorontoToronto

Personalised recommendations