Advertisement

A structural analysis of field/circuit coupled problems based on a generalised circuit element

  • Idoia Cortes GarciaEmail author
  • Herbert De Gersem
  • Sebastian Schöps
Original Paper

Abstract

In some applications, there arises the need of a spatially distributed description of a physical quantity inside a device coupled to a circuit. Then, the in-space discretised system of partial differential equations is coupled to the system of equations describing the circuit (modified nodal analysis) which yields a system of differential algebraic equations (DAEs). This paper deals with the differential index analysis of such coupled systems. For that, a new generalised inductance–like element is defined. The index of the DAEs obtained from a circuit containing such an element is then related to the topological characteristics of the circuit’s underlying graph. Field/circuit coupling is performed when circuits are simulated containing elements described by Maxwell’s equations. The index of such systems with two different types of magnetoquasistatic formulations (A* and T-Ω) is then deduced by showing that the spatial discretisations in both cases lead to an inductance-like element.

Keywords

Differential algebraic equations Differential index Modified nodal analysis Eddy currents T-omega formulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Caren Tischendorf for the fruitful discussions.

Funding

This work has been supported by the Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments and the Graduate School of CE at TU Darmstadt and DFG Grant SCHO1562/1-2.

References

  1. 1.
    Albanese, R., Coccorese, E., Martone, R., Miano, G., Rubinacci, G.: On the numerical solution of the nonlinear three-dimensional eddy current problem. IEEE Trans. Magn. 27(5), 3990–3995 (1991).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.104976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albanese, R., Rubinacci, G.: Integral formulation for 3D eddy-current computation using edge elements. IEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Tech. 135(7), 457–462 (1988).  https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-a-1:19880072 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albanese, R., Rubinacci, G.: Solution of three dimensional eddy current problems by integral and differential methods. IEEE Trans. Magn. 24, 98–101 (1988).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.43865 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alonso Rodríguez, A., Valli, A.: Eddy current approximation of Maxwell equations, modeling simulation and applications, vol. 4. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1506-7 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartel, A., Baumanns, S., Schöps, S.: Structural analysis of electrical circuits including magnetoquasistatic devices. APNUM 61, 1257–1270 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2011.08.004 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bartel, A., Pulch, R.: A concept for classification of partial differential algebraic equations in nanoelectronics. In: Bonilla, L. L., Moscoso, M., Platero, G., Vega, J. M. (eds.) Progress in industrial mathematics at ECMI 2006, mathematics in industry.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71992-2_79, vol. 12. Springer, Berlin (2007)
  7. 7.
    Baumanns, S., Selva Soto, M., Tischendorf, C.: Consistent initialization for coupled circuit-device simulation. In: Roos, J., Costa, L. R. J. (eds.) Scientific computing in electrical engineering SCEE 2008, mathematics in industry, vol. 14, pp 297–304. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bedrosian, G.: A new method for coupling finite element field solutions with external circuits and kinematics. IEEE Trans. Magn. 29(2), 1664–1668 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.250726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bíró, O., Preis, K., Richter, K. R.: Various FEM formulations for the calculation of transient 3d eddy currents in nonlinear media. IEEE Trans. Magn. 31 (3), 1307–1312 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.376269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bossavit, A.: Computational electromagnetism: variational formulations, complementarity, edge elements. Academic Press, San Diego (1998). http://natrium.em.tut.fi/bossavit/ zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brenan, K. E., Campbell, S. L., Petzold, L. R.: Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations. SIAM Philadelphia (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clemens, M., Weiland, T.: Regularization of eddy-current formulations using discrete grad-div operators. IEEE Trans. Magn. 38(2), 569–572 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.996149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cortes Garcia, I., Schöps, S., De Gersem, H., Baumanns, S.: Systems of differential algebraic equations in computational electromagnetics. In: Ilchmann, A., Reis, T. (eds.) Benchmarks in differential-algebraic equations, differential-algebraic equations forum. Springer, Heidelberg (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Gersem, H., Munteanu, I., Weiland, T.: Construction of differential material matrices for the orthogonal finite-integration technique with nonlinear materials. IEEE Trans. Magn. 44(6), 710–713 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2007.915819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Estévez Schwarz, D.: Consistent initialization for index-2 differential algebraic equations and its application to circuit simulation. Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät II.  https://doi.org/10.18452/14512 (2000)
  16. 16.
    Estévez Schwarz, D., Tischendorf, C.: Structural analysis of electric circuits and consequences for MNA. Int. J. Circ. Theor. Appl. 28(2), 131–162 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-007X(200003/04)28:2<131::AID-CTA100>3.0.CO;2-W CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Günther, M., Feldmann, U.: The DAE-index in electric circuit simulation. Math. Comput. Simulat. 39, 573–582 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ho, C. W., Ruehli, A. E., Brennan, P. A.: The modified nodal approach to network analysis. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 22(6), 504–509 (1975).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCS.1975.1084079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jackson, J. D.: Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kameari, A.: Calculation of transient 3D eddy-current using edge elements. IEEE Trans. Magn. 26(5).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.106354 (1990)
  21. 21.
    Lamour, R., März, R., Tischendorf, C.: Differential-algebraic equations: a projector based analysis. Differential-algebraic equations forum. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27555-5 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maxwell, J. C.: A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Royal Society Transactions CLV, 459–512 (1864)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mehrmann, V.: Index concepts for differential-algebraic equations, pp 676–681. Springer, Berlin (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70529-1_120 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Monk, P.: An analysis of Nédélec’s method for the spatial discretization of Maxwell’s equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 47(1), 101–121 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(93)90093-Q MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Monk, P.: Finite element methods for maxwell’s equations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nicolet, A., Delincé, F.: Implicit Runge-Kutta methods for transient magnetic field computation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 32(3), 1405–1408 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.497510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pechstein, C.: Multigrid-Newton-methods for nonlinear-magnetostatic problems. Master’s thesis, Universität Linz, Linz Austria (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pechstein, C., Jüttler, B.: Monotonicity-preserving interproximation of b-h-curves. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 196(1), 45–57 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2005.08.021 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Petzold, L. R.: Differential/algebraic equations are not ODE’s. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 3(3), 367–384 (1982).  https://doi.org/10.1137/0903023 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reis, T.: Mathematical modeling and analysis of nonlinear time-invariant rlc circuits. In: Benner, P., Findeisen, R., Flockerzi, D., Reichl, U., Sundmacher, K. (eds.) Large-scale networks in engineering and life sciences., Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Cham, Birkhäuser (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Römer, U.: Numerical approximation of the magnetoquasistatic model with uncertainties and its application to magnet design. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41294-8 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Russenschuck, S.: Field computation for accelerator magnets: analytical and numerical methods for electromagnetic design and optimization. Wiley-VCH, Berlin (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schöps, S: Multiscale modeling and multirate time-integration of field/circuit coupled problems. Ph.D. thesis, Bergische Universität Wuppertal & Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Düsseldorf. VDI Verlag. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 21 (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schöps, S., De Gersem, H., Weiland, T.: Winding functions in transient magnetoquasistatic field-circuit coupled simulations. COMPEL 32(6), 2063–2083 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1108/COMPEL-01-2013-0004 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tischendorf, C.: Coupled systems of differential algebraic and partial differential equations in circuit and device simulation. Habilitation. Humboldt Universität, Berlin, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tsukerman, I. A.: Finite element differential-algebraic systems for eddy current problems. Numer. Algorithm. 31(1), 319–335 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021112107163 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tsukerman, I. A., Konrad, A., Meunier, G., Sabonnadière, J. C.: Coupled field-circuit problems: trends and accomplishments. IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 (2), 1701–1704 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.250733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Webb, J. P., Forghani, B.: The low-frequency performance of hϕ and tω methods using edge elements for 3d eddy current problems. IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 (6), 2461–2463 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.280983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weiland, T.: A discretization method for the solution of Maxwell’s equations for six-component fields. AEU 31, 116–120 (1977)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weiland, T.: Time domain electromagnetic field computation with finite difference methods. Int. J. Numer. Model. Electron. Network. Dev. Field 9(4), 295–319 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1204(199607)9:4<295::AID-JNM240>3.0.CO;2-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhou, P., Badics, Z., Lin, D., Cendes, Z.: Nonlinear t-ω formulation including motion for multiply connected 3-d problems. IEEE Trans. Magn 44(6).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2007.915118 (2008)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations