Advertisement

Numerical Algorithms

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 1085–1096 | Cite as

Exponential and trigonometrical fittings: user-friendly expressions for the coefficients

  • L. Gr. IxaruEmail author
Original Paper
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

The coefficients of numerical methods derived by exponential and trigonometric fittings are functions of parameter z = ωh where ω and h are the involved frequency and the step size, respectively. The problem is that, for the versions described until now in the literature, the accurate computation of each coefficient asks for four different formulas (an analytic formula valid for big z and a power series expansion for small z, in each of the two fittings). In this paper, we describe an algorithm-like technique which allows replacing the set of the four by a single formula. The latter is universally valid, in the sense that it can be successfully applied irrespective of whether z is small or big, or of whether the fitting is trigonometric or exponential. Two sets of special functions, sets C and S, are introduced for this purpose, and their mathematical properties are established. Examples and applications are also presented.

Keywords

Numerical methods Trigonometric fitting Exponential fitting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ixaru, L. Gr., Vanden Berghe, G.: Exponential Fitting. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ixaru, L.Gr., Rizea, M.: A Numerov-like scheme for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation in the deep continuum spectrum of energies. Comput. Phys. Commun. 19, 23–27 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ixaru, L. Gr.: Operations on oscillatory functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 105, 1–19 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paternoster, B.: Present state-of-the-art in exponential fitting. A contribution dedicated to Liviu Ixaru on his 70-th anniversary. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2499–2512 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conte, D., Paternoster, B.: Modified Gauss-Laguerre exponential fitting based formulae. J. Sci. Comput. 69, 227–243 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simos, T.E.: High order closed Newton-Cotes trigonometrically-fitted formulae for the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 209, 137–151 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simos, T.E.: Exponentially and trigonometrically fitted methods for the solution of the Schrödinger equation. Acta Appl. Math. 110, 1331–1352 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Franco, J.M.: Exponentially fitted explicit Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 167, 1–19 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Monovasilis, Th., Simos, T.E.: New second-order exponentially and trigonometrically fitted symplectic integrators for the numerical solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Chem. 42, 535–545 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monovasilis, T., Kalogiratou, Z., Ramos, H., Simos, T.E: Modified two-step hybrid methods for the numerical integration of oscillatory problems. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 40, 5286–5294 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ndukum, P.L., Biala, T.A., Jator, S.N., Adeniyi, R.B.: On a family of trigonometrically fitted extended backward differentiation formulas for stiff and oscillatory initial value problems. Numer. Algor. 74, 267–287 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Ambrosio, R., Paternoster, B.: Numerical solution of a diffusion problem by exponentially fitted finite difference methods. SpringerPlus 3, 425 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Ambrosio, R., Ixaru, L.Gr., Paternoster, B.: Construction of the ef-based Runge-Kutta methods revisited. Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 322–329 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ixaru, L.Gr.: Runge-Kutta method with equation dependent coefficients. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 63–69 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bocher, P., Montijano, J.I., Randez, L., Van Daele, M.: Explicit Runge-Kutta methods for stiff problems with a gap in their eigenvalue spectrum. J. Sci. Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-018-0737-3 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Theoretical Physics“Horia Hulubei” National Institute of Physics and Nuclear EngineeringBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Academy of Romanian ScientistsBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations