Advertisement

Numerical Algorithms

, Volume 45, Issue 1–4, pp 61–74 | Cite as

A comparison of numerical integration rules for the meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method

  • Annamaria Mazzia
  • Massimiliano Ferronato
  • Giorgio Pini
  • Giuseppe Gambolati
Original Paper

Abstract

The meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method is a mesh-free procedure for solving partial differential equations. However, the benefit in avoiding the mesh construction and refinement is counterbalanced by the use of complicated non polynomial shape functions with subsequent difficulties, and a potentially large cost, when implementing numerical integration schemes. In this paper we describe and compare some numerical quadrature rules with the aim at preserving the MLPG solution accuracy and at the same time reducing its computational cost.

Keywords

Meshless methods Meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method Numerical integration rules 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atluri, S.N., Han, Z.D., Rajendran, A.M.: A new implementation of the meshless finite volume method, through the MLPG “mixed” approach. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 6(6), 491–513 (2004)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atluri, S.N., J, Y.C., Kim, H.G.: Analysis of thin beams, using the meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method, with generalized moving least squares interpolations. Comput. Mech. 24, 334–347 (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atluri, S.N., Kim, H.G., Cho, J.: A critical assessment of the truly meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) and local boundary integral equation (LBIE) methods. Comput. Mech. 24, 348–372 (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atluri, S.N., Shen, S.: The Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) Method. Tech Science, Forsyth, GA (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atluri, S.N., Shen, S.: The Meshless Method (MLPG) for Domain and BIE Discretizations. Tech Science, Forsyth, GA (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atluri, S.N., Zhu, T.: A new meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics. Comput. Mech. 22, 117–127 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Atluri, S.N., Zhu, T.: The meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method: a simple and less-costly alternative to the finite element methods. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 3(1), 11–51 (2002)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Belytschko, T., Krongauz, Y., Organ, D., Fleming, M., Krysl, P.: Meshless methods: an overview and recent developments. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 139, 3–47 (1996)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cools, R., Kim, K.: A survey of known and new cubature formulas for the unit disk. Report TW 300, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Computer Science (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cools, R.: An encyclopaedia of cubature formulas. J. Complex. 19(3), 445–453 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De, S., Bathe, K.J.: The method of finite spheres. Comput. Mech. 25, 329–345 (2000)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De, S., Bathe, K.J.: The method of finite spheres with improved numerical integration. Comput. Struct. 79, 2183–2196 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferronato, M., Mazzia, A., Pini, G., Gambolati, G.: A meshless method for axi-symmetric poroelastic simulations: numerical study. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 70(12), 1346–1365 (2007) (doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.1931)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferronato, M., Mazzia, A., Pini, G., Gambolati, G.: Accuracy and performance of meshless local Petrov–Galerkin methods in 2-D elastostatic problems. JP J. Solids Struct. 1, 35–59 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lancaster, P., S̆alkauskas, K.: Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods. Math. Comput. 37(155), 141–158 (1981)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu, Y.Y., Belytschko, T., Gu, L.: A new implementation of the element free Galerkin method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 113, 397–414 (1994)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pecher, R.: Efficient cubature formulae for MLPG and related methods. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 65, 566–593 (2006)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peirce, W.H.: Numerical integration over the planar annulus. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 5(2), 66–73 (1957)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annamaria Mazzia
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Ferronato
    • 1
  • Giorgio Pini
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Gambolati
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Metodi e Modelli Matematici per le Scienze ApplicateUniversità degli Studi di PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations