Advertisement

Compensation strategies based on Bode step concept for actuator rate limit effect on first-order plus time-delay systems

  • Jie YuanEmail author
  • Shumin Fei
  • YangQuan ChenEmail author
Original paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Rate limit of system actuators is one of the major restrictions in the physical world. However, in classical and modern control design, the actuator rate limit has always been neglected. The rate limit generates amplitude attenuation and phase delay of the control signal, which will deteriorate closed-loop system performance, and may even lead to system instability. In this study, the Bode step control method was applied to the first-order plus time-delay system to achieve a better tolerance of smaller rate limit value. A rate limit compensation strategy is proposed based on the describing function and the onset frequency of the rate limiter. Both illustrative example and hardware-in-the-loop experiments are given to show the effectiveness of Bode step controller and the proposed rate limit compensation method.

Keywords

Actuator rate limit Describing function Bode step First-order plus time-delay system Bode integral formula 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sun, W., Gao, H., Kaynak, O.: Vibration isolation for active suspensions with performance constraints and actuator saturation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 20(2), 675–683 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2014.2319355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, S., Cai, M., Xiang, Z.: Robust sampled-data \(H_{\infty }\) control for offshore platforms subject to irregular wave forces and actuator saturation. Nonlinear Dyn. 88(4), 2705–2721 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shojaei, K.: Output-feedback formation control of wheeled mobile robots with actuators saturation compensation. Nonlinear Dyn. 89(4), 2867–2878 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McRuer, D.T.: National Research Council: Aviation Safety and Pilot Control: Understanding and Preventing Unfavorable Pilot-Vehicle Interactions. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (1997) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duda, H.: Flight control system design considering rate saturation. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2(4), 265–275 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanke, D.: Handling qualities analysis on rate limiting elements in flight control systems. In: Flight Vehicle Integration Panel Workshop on Pilot Induced Oscillations. AGARD-AR-335 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amato, F., Iervolino, R., Pandit, M., Scala, S., Verde, L.: Analysis of pilot-in-the-loop oscillations due to position and rate saturations. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 4, pp. 3564–3569 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meng, J., Xu, H., Zhang, J.: A comparison of rate-limit phase compensator to prevent category II pilot induced oscillations. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 3872–3877 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alstrom, R.B., Bollt, E., Marzocca, P., Ahmadi, G.: The application of nonlinear pre-filters to prevent aeroservoelastic interactions due to actuator rate limiting. In: Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuan, J., Chen, Y., Fei, S.: Analysis of actuator rate limit effects on first-order plus time-delay systems under fractional-order proportional–integral control. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(4), 37–42 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brieger, O., Kerr, M., Leißling, D., Postlethwaite, I., Sofrony, J., Turner, M.: Flight testing of a rate saturation compensation scheme on the attas aircraft. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 13(2–3), 92–104 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buchholz, J.J.: Time-delay induced by control surface rate saturation. Zeitschrift fur Flugwissenschaften und Weltraumforschung 17(5), 287–293 (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chalk, C.: Study of a software rate limit concept. Calspan Flight Research Memorandum (636) (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tran, A.T., Sakamoto, N., Kikuchi, Y., Mori, K.: Pilot induced oscillation suppression controller design via nonlinear optimal output regulation method. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 68, 278–286 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gatley, S.L., Turner, M.C., Postlethwaite, I., Kumar, A.: A comparison of rate-limit compensation schemes for pilot-induced-oscillation avoidance. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10(1), 37–47 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rundqwist, L., Stahl-Gunnarsson, K.: Phase compensation of rate limiters in unstable aircraft. In: Proceeding of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, pp. 19–24 (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sofrony, J., Turner, M.C., Postlethwaite, I.: A simple anti-windup compensation scheme for systems with rate-limited actuators. In: IEEE 2009 ICCAS-SICE, pp. 3311–3316 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guilhem, P., Jean-Marc, B.: Application of robust antiwindup design to the longitudinal aircraft control to cover actuator loss. IFAC Proc. Vol. 46(19), 506–511 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou, S., Zheng, M., Tomizuka, M.: A generalized anti-windup scheme considering amplitude and rate saturations. In: ASME 2016 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, pp. V002T22A007–V002T22A007. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    EL W, B.: Network analysis and feedback amplifier design. D. vanNostrand p. 52 (1945)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banos, A., Cervera, J., Lanusse, P., Sabatier, J.: Bode optimal loop shaping with CRONE compensators. J. Vib. Control 17(13), 1964–1974 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luo, Y., Zhang, T., Lee, B., Kang, C., Chen, Y.: Disturbance observer design with Bode’s ideal cut-off filter in hard-disc-drive servo system. Mechatronics 23(7), 856–862 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karimi, A., Garcia, D., Longchamp, R.: PID controller tuning using Bode’s integrals. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 11(6), 812–821 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barbosa, R.S., Machado, J.T., Ferreira, I.M.: Tuning of PID controllers based on Bode’s ideal transfer function. Nonlinear Dyn. 38(1–4), 305–321 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mitchell, R.: Simplifying Bode’s maximum available feedback design. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 43(1), 34–47 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gilbreath, G.P.: Prediction of pilot-induced oscillations (PIO) due to actuator rate limiting using the open-loop onset point (OLOP) criterion. Technical report, Air Force Inst of Tech Wright-Pattersonafb OH (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duda, H.: Frequency domain analysis of rate limiting elements in flight control systems. Forschungsbericht- Deutsche Forschungsanstalt fuer Luft- und Raumfahrt, DLR-FB (94), 40 (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lurie, B., Enright, P.: Classical Feedback Control: With MATLAB® and Simulink®, 2nd edn. Automation and Control Engineering. CRC Press, Boca raton (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T., Astrom, K.J.: Advanced PID control, vol. 461. ISA-The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society Research Triangle (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, Z., Chen, Y.Q.: Identification of linear fractional order systems using the relay feedback approach. In: IEEE 2014 American Control Conference, pp. 3704–3709 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Measurement and Control of CSE, Ministry of Education, School of AutomationSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Mechatronics, Embedded Systems and Automation LabUniversity of CaliforniaMercedUSA

Personalised recommendations