Periodic habitat destruction and migration can paradoxically enable sustainable territorial expansion
- 149 Downloads
Despite depleting the resources in their environments, some species and societies are capable of sustainable habitat expansion by alternating between a low-growth migratory lifestyle and high-growth but destructive behavior. Examples include nomadic pastoralism and shifting cultivation, practiced by humans for millennia. Although specific models have been developed for species or societies which practice periodic migration and habitat depletion, theoretical insight into such phenomena as a whole is lacking. Prior work has shown that a population in a single habitat can survive by alternating between a resource-independent but negative-growth ‘nomadic’ strategy and a destructive but high-growth ‘colonial’ strategy. By explicitly modeling the spatial dynamics of these strategies as they migrate across multiple habitats, we now demonstrate that a population can not only survive, but also sustainably colonize an arbitrarily large network of habitats by alternating between the two strategies. This is possible under a wide range of conditions, as long as the resource level at which a colonial population switches to nomadism is sufficiently high, and the number of neighbors of each habitat in the network is reasonably small. Our theoretical model thus explains the apparent paradox of how two life strategies that individually lead to extinction can nonetheless be combined through spatiotemporal alternation to enable sustained territorial expansion—a finding which synthesizes the theoretical frameworks of Parrondo’s paradox with the exploration–exploitation dilemma.
KeywordsEcological sustainability Migration ecology Habitat destruction Habitat expansion Parrondo’s paradox Exploration–exploitation dilemma Game theory
This project was funded by the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) Start-up Research Grant (SRG SCI 2019 142).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supplementary material 2 (mp4 15763 KB)
- 1.Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H., Shachak, M.: Organisms as ecosystem engineers. In: Ecosystem management, 130–147. Springer (1994)Google Scholar
- 5.Goldstein, M.C., Beall, C.M., Cincotto, R.: Traditional nomadic pastoralism and ecological conservation on tibet’s northern plateau. Nat. Geogr. Res. 6, 139–156 (1990)Google Scholar
- 8.Thrupp, L.A., et al.: The Diversity and Dynamics of Shifting Cultivation: Myths, Realities, and Policy Implications. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC (1997)Google Scholar
- 13.Dressler, G., Mueller, B., Frank, K.: Mobility–a panacea for pastoralism? An ecological-economic modelling approach. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress On Environmental Modelling And Software (2012)Google Scholar
- 18.Williams, P.D., Hastings, A.: Paradoxical persistence through mixed-system dynamics: towards a unified perspective of reversal behaviours in evolutionary ecology. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences rspb20102074 (2011)Google Scholar
- 22.Cheong, K.H., Koh, J.M., Jones, M.C.: Paradoxical survival: Examining the parrondo effect across biology. BioEssays 41, 1900027 (2019). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bies.201900027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Crossan, M.M., Hurst, D.K.: Strategic renewal as improvisation: reconciling the tension between exploration and exploitation. In: Ecology and Strategy, 273–298 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2006)Google Scholar
- 31.Saha, S., Samanta, G.P.: Influence of dispersal and strong allee effect on a two-patch predator–prey model. Int. J. Dyn. Control (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-018-0490-3
- 34.Hardin, G.: The tragedy of the commons’(1968) 162. Science 1243, 63 (1968)Google Scholar
- 37.Cheong, K.H., Tan, Z.X., Xie, N.-G., Jones, M.: A paradoxical evolutionary mechanism in stochastically switching environments. Sci. Rep. 6, 34889 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34889
- 41.Ye, Y., Cheong, K.H., Cen, Y.-w., Xie, N.-g.: Effects of behavioral patterns and network topology structures on parrondo’s paradox. Sci. Rep. 6, 37028 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37028