Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 95, Issue 2, pp 1147–1164 | Cite as

The stability analysis of the dynamic pricing strategy for bundling goods: a comparison between simultaneous and sequential pricing mechanism

  • Junhai MaEmail author
  • Lei Xie
Original Paper
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we study the pricing decisions stability when a retailer adopts bundling strategy for complementary products. We firstly explore whether or not the decision maker will adopt bundling strategy, finding that bundling strategy benefits retailer’s profit by improving sales of both products. Considering demand uncertainty, we focus on a bounded rational decision maker adjusting decisions in each period, build a dynamic pricing system and study its stability based on chaos theory. According to different pricing strategies for the bundling products, we propose two game models, i.e., simultaneous and sequential game, and compare the performance on the bundling strategy and system stability. The results show that both game models can reach the same optimal decisions, but sequential game has a better performance in keeping system stable. We also show the joint influence of parameters on the system stability and find that the retailer can control a chaos system caused by uncertain demand by slowing down the speed of decision adjustment. This paper’s theoretic contribution is to compare the performance of two or more systems’ stabilities based on Jury criteria.

Keywords

Bundling strategy Stochastic demand Bounded rationality Bifurcation and chaos Dynamic pricing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by China Scholarship Council (CSC) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71571131), Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 20130032110073).

References

  1. 1.
    Nambisan, S.: Complementary product integration by high-technology new ventures: the role of initial technology strategy. Manag. Sci. 48(3), 382–398 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elrod, T., Russell, G.J., Shocker, A.D., Andrews, R.L., Bacon, L., Bayus, B.L., Carroll, J.D., Johnson, R.M., Kamakura, W.A., Lenk, P.: Inferring market structure from customer response to competing and complementary products. Mark. Lett. 13(3), 221–232 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhaskaran, S.R., Gilbert, S.M.: Selling and leasing strategies for durable goods with complementary products. Manag. Sci. 51(8), 1278–1290 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wei, J., Zhao, J., Li, Y.: Pricing decisions for complementary products with firms’ different market powers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 224(3), 507–519 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xia, Y., Xiao, T., Zhang, G.P.: Distribution channel strategies for a manufacturer with complementary products. Decis. Sci. 44(1), 39–56 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    He, Y., Yin, S.: Joint selling of complementary components under brand and retail competition. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 17(4), 470–479 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taleizadeh, A.A., Charmchi, M.: Optimal advertising and pricing decisions for complementary products. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 11(1), 111–117 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, L., Song, H., Wang, Y.: Pricing and service decisions of complementary products in a dual-channel supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 107, 223–233 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venkatesh, R., Kamakura, W.: Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products. J. Bus. 76(2), 211–231 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhargava, H.K.: Mixed bundling of two independently valued goods. Manag. Sci. 59(9), 2170–2185 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Estelami, H.: Consumer savings in complementary product bundles. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 7(3), 107–114 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yue, X., Mukhopadhyay, S.K., Zhu, X.: A Bertrand model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry. J. Bus. Res. 59(10), 1182–1192 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCardle, K.F., Rajaram, K., Tang, C.S.: Bundling retail products: models and analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(2), 1197–1217 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, B., Ng, C.T.: Pricing problem in wireless telecommunication product and service bundling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(1), 473–480 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferrer, J., Mora, H., Olivares, F.: On pricing of multiple bundles of products and services. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206(1), 197–208 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yan, R., Bandyopadhyay, S.: The profit benefits of bundle pricing of complementary products. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 18(4), 355–361 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan, R., Myers, C., Wang, J., Ghose, S.: Bundling products to success: the influence of complementarity and advertising. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 21(1), 48–53 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Danaher, B., Huang, Y., Smith, M.D., et al.: An empirical analysis of digital music bundling strategies. Manag. Sci. 60(6), 1413–1433 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Honhon, D., Pan, X.A.: Improving profit by bundling vertically differentiated products. Prod. Oper. Manag. 26, 1481–1497 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kyrtsou, C., Labys, W.C.: Evidence for chaotic dependence between US inflation and commodity prices. J. Macroecon. 28(1), 256–266 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilding, R.D.: Chaos theory: implications for supply chain management. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 9(1), 43–56 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hwarng, H.B., Xie, N.: Understanding supply chain dynamics: a chaos perspective. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184(3), 1163–1178 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chaudhry, M.I., Miranda, M.J.: Complex price dynamics in vertically linked cobweb markets. Econ. Model. 72, 363–378 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jiang, Y., Liu, Y., Shang, J., et al.: Optimizing online recurring promotions for dual-channel retailers: segmented markets with multiple objectives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 267(2), 612–627 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, F., Wang, C.: Dynamic pricing strategy and coordination in a dual-channel supply chain considering service value. Appl. Math. Model. 54, 722–742 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guo, Y., Ma, J.: Research on game model and complexity of retailer collecting and selling in closed-loop supply chain. Appl. Math. Model. 37(7), 5047–5058 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ma, J., Wang, H.: Complexity analysis of dynamic noncooperative game models for closed-loop supply chain with product recovery. Appl. Math. Model. 38(23), 5562–5572 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gupta, S., Loulou, R.: Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: strategic incentives in a duopoly. Mark. Sci. 17(4), 301–316 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hu, X., Su, P.: The newsvendor’s joint procurement and pricing problem under price-sensitive stochastic demand and purchase price uncertainty. Omega 79, 81–90 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bischi, G.I., Naimzada, A.: Global Analysis of a Dynamic Duopoly Game with Bounded Rationality. Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications, pp. 361–385. Birkhäuser, Boston (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Puu, T., Panchuk, A.: Oligopoly and stability. Chaos Solitons Fractals 41(5), 2505–2516 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li, T., Ma, J.: Complexity analysis of dual-channel game model with different managers’ business objectives. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 20(1), 199–208 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Management and EconomicsTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Business SchoolNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations