Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 94, Issue 4, pp 2479–2490 | Cite as

An extended delayed feedback control method for the two-lane traffic flow

  • Ying Rong
  • Huiying Wen
Original Paper
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

This study extended a delayed feedback control method for the two-lane car-following model. In order to suppress the traffic jams more actually in the two-lane vehicle groups with lane-changing behavior, we introduced the delayed time of receiving the longitudinal and lateral interaction information in the controller into the feedback signals for the control scheme. The stability conditions for different cases were derived, respectively, according to the delayed time by the theory analysis. And the delayed time in the controller was found to instigate the traffic oscillations when the feedback gains were designed improper, which showed that the longer delayed time induces worse traffic jams. The numerical simulation results were found consistent with the theoretical findings as well. Finally, we further presented a comparative study of the proposed control method by a comparison with one existing controller which did not consider the delayed time. And it showed that the delayed time in the controller also affects the traffic flow and performance of control method.

Keywords

Delayed feedback Delayed time Control method Car-following model Stability analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51578247, 51378222).

References

  1. 1.
    Sun, C., Moura, S.J., Hu, X., et al.: Dynamic traffic feedback data enabled energy management in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 23(3), 1075–1086 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hu, X., Wang, H., Tang, X.: Cyber-physical control for energy-saving vehicle following with connectivity. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64(11), 8578–8587 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A., Sugiyama, Y.: Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys. Rev. E 51(2), 1035–1042 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakanishi, K., Nakayama, A.: Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay. Phys. Rev. E 58(5), 5429–5435 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Helbing, D., Tilch, B.: Generalized force model of traffic dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 58, 133–138 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiang, R., Wu, Q., Zhu, Z.: Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory. Phys. Rev. E 64, 017101 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma, S.: Modeling and analyses of driver’s characteristics in a traffic system with passing. Nonlinear Dyn. 86, 2093–2104 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muramastu, M., Nagatani, T.: Soliton and kink jams in traffic flow with open boundaries. Phys. Rev. E 60(1), 180–187 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu, G., Wang, P., Wu, X., et al.: Linear and nonlinear stability snalysis of a car-following model considering velocity difference of two adjacent lanes. Nonlinear Dyn. 84, 387–397 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, Y., Zhang, L., Peeta, S., et al.: Non-lane-discipline-based car-following model considering the effects of two-sided lateral gaps. Nonlinear Dyn. 80, 227–238 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, Z., Xu, X., Xu, S., et al.: A heterogeneous traffic flow model consisting of two types of vehicles with different sensitivities. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 42, 132–145 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wen, H., Rong, Y., Zeng, C., et al.: The effect of driver’s characteristics on the stability of traffic flow under honk environment. Nonlinear Dyn. 84, 1517–1528 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Konishi, K., Kokame, H., Hirata, K.: Coupled map car-following model and its delayed-feedback control. Phys. Rev. E 60(4), 4000–4007 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao, X., Gao, Z.: Controlling traffic jams by a feedback signal. Eur. Phys. J. B-Condens Matter Complex Syst. 43, 565–572 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liang, Z., Shou-Feng, M., Shi-Quan, Z.: Influence of lane change on stability analysis for two-lane traffic flow. Chin. Phys. B 20(8), 088701 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cui, Y., Cheng, R., Ge, H.: The velocity difference control signal for two-lane car-following model. Nonlinear Dyn. 78, 585–596 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pan, D., Zheng, Y.: Vehicle following control under a rational initial state. Nonlinear Dyn. 83, 579–590 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hong-Xia, G.: Modified coupled map car-following model and its delayed feedback control scheme. Chin. Phys. B 20(9), 090502 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jin, I.G., Orosz, G.: Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback. Transp. Res. Part C 46, 46–64 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haddad, J., Ramezani, M., Geroliminis, N.: Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 54, 17–36 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li, Z., Li, W., Shangzhi, X., et al.: Traffic behavior of mixed traffic flow with two kinds of different self-stabilizing control vehicles. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 436, 729–738 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hu, Y., Ma, T., Chen, J.: An extended multi-anticipative delay model of traffic flow. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19(9), 3128–3135 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xue, Y., Shi, Y., Lv, L., et al.: Feedback control for the lattice hydrodynamics model with drivers’ reaction time. Nonlinear Dyn. 88, 145–156 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davis, L.C.: Stability of adaptive cruise control systems taking account of vehicle response time and delay. Phys. Lett. A 376, 2658–2662 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jin, Y., Xu, M.: Stability analysis in a car-following model with reaction-time delay and delayed feedback control. Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl. 459, 107–116 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Automobile and Transportation EngineeringGuangdong Polytechnic Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Civil Engineering and TransportationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations