Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 189–204 | Cite as

R-functions theory applied to investigation of nonlinear free vibrations of functionally graded shallow shells

  • Tetyana Shmatko
  • Atul Bhaskar
Original Paper
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

Nonlinear free vibration of functionally graded shallow shells with complex planform is investigated using the R-functions method and variational Ritz method. The proposed method is developed in the framework of the first-order shear deformation shallow shell theory. Effect of transverse shear strains and rotary inertia is taken into account. The properties of functionally graded materials are assumed to be varying continuously through the thickness according to a power law distribution. The Rayleigh–Ritz procedure is applied to obtain the frequency equation. Admissible functions are constructed by the R-functions theory. To implement the proposed approach, the corresponding software has been developed. Comprehensive numerical results for three types of shallow shells with positive, zero and negative curvature with complex planform are presented in tabular and graphical forms. The convergence of the natural frequencies with increasing number of admissible functions has been checked out. Effect of volume fraction exponent, geometry of a shape and boundary conditions on the natural and nonlinear frequencies is brought out. For simply supported rectangular FG shallow shells, the results obtained are compared with those available in the literature. Comparison demonstrates a good accuracy of the approach proposed.

Keywords

Functionally graded shallow shells The R-functions theory Method by Ritz Geometrically nonlinear vibrations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out as a part of the Erasmus Mundus postdoctoral exchange research program ACTIVE.

References

  1. 1.
    Paulino, G.H., Jin, Z.H., Dodds Jr., R.H.: Failure of functionally graded materials. In: Karihallo, B., Knauss, W.G. (eds.) Comprehensive Structural Integrity, vol. 2, pp. 607–644. Elsevier, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Markworth, A.J., Ramesh, K.S., Parks, W.P.: Review: modelling studies applied to functional graded materials. J. Mater. Sci. 30, 2183–2193 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birman, V., Byrd, L.W.: Modeling and analysis of functionally graded materials and structures. Appl. Mech. Reviews 60, 195–216 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bich, D.H., Hao, LKh: Non-linear vibration of functionally graded shallow spherical shells. Vietnam J. Mech. VAST 32(4), 199–210 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Woo, J., Meguid, S.A.: Nonlinear analysis of functionally graded plates and shallow shells. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 7409–7421 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganapathi, M.: Dynamic stability characteristics of functionally graded materials shallow spherical shells. Compos. Struct. 79, 338–343 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alijani, F., Amabili, M.: Non-linear vibrations of shells: a literature review from 2003 to 2013. Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 58, 233–257 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shen, H.S.: Functionally Graded Materials of Plates and Shells. CRC Press, Florida (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Awrejcewicz, J., Krys’ko, V.A., Krys’ko, A.V.: Thermo-dynamics of Plates and Shells. Springer, Berlin (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bich, D.H., Dung, D.V., Nam, V.N.: Nonlinear dynamic analysis of eccentrically stiffened functionally graded cylindrical panels. Compos. Struct. 94, 2465–2473 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reddy, J.N.: Analysis of functionally graded plates. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 47, 663–684 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Awrejcewicz, J., Papkova, I.V., Krylov, E.U., Krysko, V.A.: Wavelet-based analysis of the regular ad chaotic dynamics of rectangular flexible plates subjected to shear-harmonic loading. Shock Vib. 19, 979–994 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lam, K.Y., Li, H., Ng, T.Y., Chua, C.F.: Generalized differential quadrature method for the free vibration of truncated conical panels. J. Sound Vib. 251, 329–348 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tornabene, F., Liverani, A., Caligiana, G.: FGM and laminated doubly curved shells and panels of revolution with a free form meridian: a 2-D GDQ solution for free vibrations. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 53, 446–470 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andrianov, I.V., Awrejcewicz, J., Diskovsky, A.A.: Sensitivity analysis in design of constructions made of functionally graded materials. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 227(1), 19–28 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andrianov, I.V., Awrejcewicz, J., Starushenko, G.A.: Asymptotic analysis of the Maxwell-Garnett formula using the two-phase composite model. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 7(2), 27 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1758825115500258
  17. 17.
    Zhu, Su, Guoyong, Jin, Tiangui, Ye: Free vibration analysis of moderately thick functionally graded open shells with general boundary conditions. Compos. Struct. 117, 169–186 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu, Su, Guoyong, Jin, Tiangui, Ye, Xueren, Wang: Free vibration analysis of laminated composite and functionally graded sector plates with general boundary conditions. Compos. Struct. 132, 720–736 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jin, G., Shi, Sh, Su, Zh, Li, Sh, Liu, Zh: A modified Fourier–Ritz approach for free vibration analysis of laminated functionally graded shallow shells with general boundary conditions. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 93, 256–269 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao, X., Lee, Y.Y., Liew, K.M.: Thermoelastic and vibration analysis of functionally graded cylindrical shells. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 51, 694–707 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neves, A.M.A., Ferreira, A.J.M., Carrera, E., Cinefra, M., Roque, C.M.C., Jorge, R.M.N.: Free vibration analysis of functionally graded shells by a higher-order shear deformation theory and radial basis functions collocation accounting for through the thickness deformations. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 37, 24–34 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pradyumna, S., Bandyopadhyay, J.N.: Free vibration analysis of functionally graded curved panels using a higher-order finite element formulation. J. Sound Vib. 318, 176–192 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matsunaga, H.: Free vibration and stability of functionally graded shallow shells according to a 2D higher-order deformation theory. Compos. Struct. 84, 132–146 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kurpa, L.V.: Nonlinear free vibrations of multilayer shallow shells with a symmetric structure and with a complicated form of the plan. J. Math. Sci. 162(1), 85–98 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kurpa, L., Pilgun, G., Amabili, M.: Nonlinear vibrations of shallow shells with complex boundary: R-functions method and experiments. J. Sound Vib. 306, 580–600 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Awrejcewicz, J., Kurpa, L., Shmatko, T.: Large amplitude free vibration of orthotropic shallow shells of complex shapes with variable thickness. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 10, 147–160 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Awrejcewicz, J., Kurpa, L., Shmatko, T.: Investigating geometrically nonlinear vibrations of laminated shallow shells with layers of variable thickness via the R-functions theory. Compos. Struct. 125, 575–585 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kurpa, L.V.: Nonlinear vibrations of laminated shells with layers of variable thickness. In: Pietraszkiewicz, W., Witkowski, W. (eds.) Shell Structures: Theory and Applications, vol. 3, pp. 305–308. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rvachev, V.L.: The R-functions Theory and its Some Application. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1982). (in Russian) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kurpa, L.V.: R-functions Method for Solving Linear Problems of Bending and Vibrations of Shallow Shells. Kharkiv NTU Press, Kharkiv (2009). (in Russian) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Higher MathematicsNational Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”KharkivUkraine
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and the EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations