Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 90, Issue 4, pp 2545–2556 | Cite as

Exact solutions and adiabatic invariants for equations of satellite attitude motion under Coulomb torque

  • Vladimir S. Aslanov
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper focuses on the attitude dynamics of a defunct axisymmetric satellite under the action of Coulomb forces to enable active space debris removal. Touchless Coulomb interaction occurs between an active spacecraft and the passive satellite at a fixed separation distance. The recently developed multi-sphere method of Schaub and Stevenson allows providing a simplified electrostatic force and torque model between non-spherical space objects. The existence of torques between charged bodies makes it necessary to study the attitude motion of the passive satellite for ensuring the safety of the space debris removal. The goal is first to deduce the equations of motion in the canonical form which is suitable for analytical analysis and then to construct a phase portrait, and to obtain exact solutions using Jacobi elliptic functions. Finally, for the disturbed motion of the system of two bodies, when the distance between the active spacecraft and the defunct satellite (or) and charge voltage changes slowly over time, adiabatic invariants are found in terms of the complete elliptic integrals. In this case, the adiabatic invariants are approximately first integrals of the disturbed system and they remain approximately constant for long time intervals during which the parameters change considerably. For a plane motion, the adiabatic invariants used to obtain an analytical solution for envelope of a deflection angle of the defunct satellite. This work extends the theory to the three-dimensional tumbling motion of a satellite on an orbit. The obtained results can be applied to study an opportunity of the space debris removal by the Coulomb interaction with the active spacecraft as a pusher.

Keywords

Electrostatic toque Satellite Adiabatic invariants Exact solutions Space debris 

Abbreviation

MSM

Multi-Sphere Method

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR15-01-01456-A).

References

  1. 1.
    Cover, J.H., Knauer, W., Maurer, H.A.: Lightweight reflecting structures utilizing electrostatic inflation. US Patent 3,546,706, Oct 1966Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    King, L.B., Parker, G.G., Deshmukh, S., Chong, J.H.: Spacecraft formation-flying using inter-vehicle Coulomb forces, NASA/NIAC, Technical Report. http://www.niac.usra.edu. Retrieved Jan 2002
  3. 3.
    King, L.B., Parker, G.G., Deshmukh, S., Chong, J.-H.: Study of interspacecraft Coulomb forces and implications for formation flying. J. Propuls. Power 19(3), 497–505 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berryman, J., Schaub, H.: Analytical charge analysis for 2- and 3-craft Coulomb formations. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(6), 1701–1710 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schaub, H., Hall, C., Berryman, J.: Necessary conditions for circularly-restricted static Coulomb formations. J. Astronaut. Sci. 54, 525–541 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berryman, J., Schaub, H.: Static equilibrium configurations in GEO Coulomb spacecraft formations. In: Advances in Astronautical Sciences, vol. 120, pp. 51–68. American Astronautical Society, Paper No. AAS 05–104 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schaub, H., Gordon, G.P., Lyon, B.K.: Challenges and prospects of Coulomb spacecraft formation control. J. Astronaut. Sci. 52(1), 169–193 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stevenson, D., Schaub, H.: Multi-sphere method for modeling spacecraft electrostatic forces and torques. Adv. Space Res. 51(1), 10–20 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schaub, H., Stevenson, D.: Prospects of relative attitude control using Coulomb actuation. J. Astronaut. Sci. 60(3–4), 258–277 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennett, T., Schaub, H.: Touchless electrostatic three-dimensional detumbling of large axi-symmetric debris. J. Astronaut. Sci. 62(3), 233–253 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stevenson, D., Schaub, H.: Optimization of sphere population for electrostatic multi sphere model. In: 12th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference, Kitakyushu, Japan, 14–18 May 2012Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hogan, E., Schaub, H.: Collinear invariant shapes for three-craft Coulomb formations. Acta Astronaut. 12, 78–89 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aslanov, V.S.: Rigid Body Dynamics for Space Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hughes, J., Schaub, H.: Spacecraft electrostatic force and torque expansions yielding appropriate fidelity measures. In: AAS Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 5–9 Feb 2017Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aslanov, V.S.: Chaotic behavior of a body in a resistant medium. Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 73, 85–93 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirchhoff, G.: Ueber die Bewegung eines Rotationskorpers in einer Flussigkeit. J. fur die reine und Angew. Math. 71, 237–262 (1869)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borisov, A.V., Mamaev, I.S.: Rigid Body Dynamics: Hamiltonian Methods, Integrability, Chaos. Institute of Computer Science, Moscow-Izhevsk (2005). (in Russian) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aslanov, V., Ledkov, A.: Analysis of the resonance and ways of its elimination at the descent of spacecrafts in the rarefied atmosphere. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 13(4), 224–231 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Korn, G.A., Korn, T.M.: Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers. Dover publications, Mineola (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aslanov, V.S., Boiko, V.V.: Nonlinear resonant motion of an asymmetric spacecraft in the atmosphere. Cosm. Res. 23(3), 341–347 (1985)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Serov, V.M.: Rotational motion of the dynamically symmetric rigid body under the influence of the nonlinear moment. Mech. Solids 5, 26–31 (1991). (in Russian) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aslanov, V.S., Serov, V.M.: Rotation of an axisymmetric rigid body with biharmonic characteristic of the restoring torque. Mech. Solids 30(3), 15–20 (1995). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lösch, F., Emde, F., Jahnke, E.: Tables of Higher Functions. Teubner, Leipzig (1960)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Born, M.: Problem of Atomic Dynamics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (1926)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neishtadt, A.I.: Probability phenomena due to separatrix crossing. Chaos: an interdisciplinary. J. Nonlinear Sci. 1(1), 42–48 (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Borisov, A.V., Mamaev, I.S.: Adiabatic invariants, diffusion and acceleration in rigid body dynamics. Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 21(2), 232–248 (2016)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aslanov, V. S.: Dynamics of a satellite with flexible appendages in the Coulomb interaction. J. Guid. Control Dyn. (2007). doi: 10.2514/1.G002832
  28. 28.
    Aslanov, V.S.: The oscillations of a body with an orbital tethered system. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 71(6), 926–932 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Samara National Research UniversitySamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations