Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 1803–1815 | Cite as

A type of biased consensus-based distributed neural network for path planning

  • Yinyan Zhang
  • Shuai LiEmail author
  • Hongliang Guo
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, a unified scheme is proposed for solving the classical shortest path problem and the generalized shortest path problem, which are highly nonlinear. Particularly, the generalized shortest path problem is more complex than the classical shortest path problem since it requires finding a shortest path among the paths from a vertex to all the feasible destination vertices. Different from existing results, inspired by the optimality principle of Bellman’s dynamic programming, we formulate the two types of shortest path problems as linear programs with the decision variables denoting the lengths of possible paths. Then, biased consensus neural networks are adopted to solve the corresponding linear programs in an efficient and distributed manner. Theoretical analysis guarantees the performance of the proposed scheme. In addition, two illustrative examples are presented to validate the efficacy of the proposed scheme and the theoretical results. Moreover, an application to mobile robot navigation in a maze further substantiates the efficacy of the proposed scheme.

Keywords

Biased consensus neural network Nonlinear equation Linear program Path planning Shortest path 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (with number 61401385), by Hong Kong Research Grants Council Early Career Scheme (with number 25214015) and also by Departmental General Research Fund of Hong Kong Polytechnic University (with number G.61.37.UA7L). Besides, the authors would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and constructive suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim, S., Lewis, M.E., White, C.C.: State space reduction for nonstationary stochastic shortest path problems with real-time traffic information. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 6, 273–284 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cota-Ruiz, J., Rivas-Perea, P., Sifuentes, E., Gonzalez-Landaeta, R.: A recursive shortest path routing algorithm with application for wireless sensor network localization. IEEE Sens. J. 16, 4631–4637 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Junior, J.J., Cortex, P.C., Backes, A.R.: Color texture classification using shortest paths in graphs. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23, 3751–3761 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, Y., Yan, X., Chen, D., Guo, D., Li, W.: QP-based refined manipulability-maximizing scheme for coordinated motion planning and control of physically constrained wheeled mobile redundant manipulators. Nonlinear Dyn. 85, 245–261 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lawler, E.L.: Combinatorial Optimization: Networks and Matroids. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, J.: A recurrent neural network for solving the shortest path problem. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I(43), 482–486 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xia, Y., Wang, J.: A discrete-time recurrent neural network for shortest-path routing. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 45(11), 2129–2134 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun, C.-C., Jan, G.E., Leu, S.-W., Yang, K.-C., Chen, Y.-C.: Near-shortest path planning on a quadratic surface with \(O(n \text{ log } n)\) time. IEEE Sens. J. 15, 6079–6080 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jan, G.E., Sun, C.-C., Tsai, W.C., Lin, T.-H.: An \(O(n \text{ log }n)\) shortest path algorithm based on Delaunay triangulation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 19, 660–666 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma, S., Feng, K., Li, J., Wang, H., Cong, G., Huai, J.: Proxies for shortest path and distance queries. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28(7), 1835–1849 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lei, G., Dou, Y., Li, R., Xia, F.: An FPGA implementation for solving the large single-source-shortest-path problem. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II(63), 473–477 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, X., Rakkiyappan, R., Velmurugan, G.: Dissipativity analysis of memristor-based complex-valued neural networks with time-varying delays. Inf. Sci. 294, 645–665 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xiao, L., Lu, R.: Finite-time solution to nonlinear equation using recurrent neural dynamics with a specially-constructed activation function. Neurocomputing 151, 246–251 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiao, L., Zhang, Y.: A new performance index for the repetitive motion of mobile manipulators. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 44, 280–292 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, Y., Cheng, L., Hou, Z.-G., Yu, J., Tan, M.: Optimal formation of multirobot systems based on a recurrent neural network. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 27, 322–333 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, Q., Wang, J.: Finite-time convergent recurrent neural network with a hard-limiting activation function for constrained optimization with piecewise-linear objective functions. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 22, 601–613 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xia, Y., Wang, J.: A bi-projection neural network for solving constrained quadratic optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 27, 214–224 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, S., Xia, Y., Wang, J.: A complex-valued projection neural network for constrained optimization of real functions in complex variables. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 26, 3227–3238 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, X., Song, S.: Impulsive control for existence, uniqueness, and global stability of periodic solutions of recurrent neural networks with discrete and continuously distributed delays. IEEE Trans. Neural. Netw. Learn. Syst. 24, 868–877 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hopfield, J.J., Tank, D.W.: “Neural” computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biol. Cybern. 52, 141–152 (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tank, D.W., Hopfield, J.J.: Simple “neural” optimization networks: an A/D converter, signal decision circuit, and a linear programming circuit. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 33, 533–541 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Araújo, F., Ribeiro, B., Rodrigues, L.: A neural network for shortest path computation. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 12(5), 1067–1073 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taccari, L.: Integer programming formulations for the elementary shortest path problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252, 122–130 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nazemi, A., Omidi, F.: An efficient dynamic model for solving the shortest path problem. Transport. Res. C Emerg. 26, 1–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, Y., Wu, L., Wei, G., Wang, S.: A novel algorithm for all pairs shortest path problem based on matrix multiplication and pulse coupled neural network. Digit. Signal Process. 21, 517–521 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sang, Y., Lv, J., Qu, H., Yi, Z.: Shortest path computation using pulse-coupled neural networks with restricted autowave. Knowl. Based Syst. 114, 1–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li, X., Ma, Y., Feng, X.: Self-adaptive autowave pulse-coupled neural network for shortest-path problem. Neurocomputing 115, 63–71 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qu, H., Yi, Z., Yang, S.X.: Efficient shortest-path-tree computation in network routing based on pulse-coupled neural networks. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 43, 995–1010 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bellman, R.: On a routing problem. Q. Appl. Math. 16(1), 87–90 (1958)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, H., Chen, G., Liao, X., Huang, T.: Leader-following consensus of discrete-time multiagent systems with encoding-decoding. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 63, 401–405 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cheng, S., Yu, L., Zhang, D., Huo, L., Ji, J.: Consensus of second-order multi-agent systems using partial agents’ velocity measurements. Nonlinear Dyn. 86, 1927–1935 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li, H., Chen, G., Huang, T., Dong, Z., Zhu, W., Gao, L.: Event-triggered distributed average consensus over directed digital networks with limited communication bandwidth. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46, 3098–3110 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wen, G.-X., Chen, C.L.P., Liu, Y.-J., Liu, Z.: Neural network-based adaptive leader-following consensus control for a class of nonlinear multiagent state-delay systems. IEEE Trans. Cybern. (2016). doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2608499
  34. 34.
    Li, H., Chen, G., Huang, T., Dong, Z.: High-performance consensus control in networked systems with limited bandwidth communication and time-varying directed topologies. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. (2016). doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2519894
  35. 35.
    Zhang, Y., Chen, D., Guo, D., Liao, B., Wang, Y.: On exponential convergence of nonlinear gradient dynamics system with application to square root finding. Nonlinear Dyn. 79, 983–1003 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xiao, Y.: A nonlinearly activated neural dynamics and its finite-time solution to time-varying nonlinear equation. Neurocomputing 173, 1983–1988 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ma, Z., Wang, Y., Li, X.: Cluster-delay consensus in first-order multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn. 83(3), 1303–1310 (2016)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen, C.L.P., Wen, G.-X., Liu, Y.-J., Liu, Z.: Observer-based adaptive backstepping consensus tracking control for high-order nonlinear semi-strict-feedback multiagent systems. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46, 1591–1601 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhou, B., Liao, X.: Leader-following second-order consensus in multi-agent systems with sampled data via pinning control. Nonlinear Dyn. 78, 555–569 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Khalil, H.K.: Nonlinear Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ComputingThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung Hom, KowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.Center for Robotics, School of Automation EngineeringUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina

Personalised recommendations