A nonlinear contact pressure distribution model for wear calculation of planar revolute joint with clearance
- 336 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
As various errors result from manufacture and assembly processes or wear effect, clearance joint widely exists in mechanical system as a base component. The coupling analysis of tribology and dynamics of clearance joint is important to the reliability of mechanical system. A nonlinear contact pressure distribution mode (NLCP) is proposed to combine dynamics analysis with wear calculation together in this paper. The discrete thought of Winkler model is adopted to deal with contact problem with a high conformal rate. The contact relationship in a local microcontact area can be regarded as the contact between cylinder and plane. And the local contact pressure is acquired based on Hertz contact theory. The NLCP model has not only described the nonlinear relationship between contact pressure and penetration depth, but also avoided the complexity in contact pressure computation. The performance of NLCP model is demonstrated in comparison with asymmetric Winkler model, revealing that NLCP model has enhanced the calculation accuracy with a good efficiency. A comprehensive experimental study on the wear calculation of a slider–crank mechanism with clearance joint is presented and discussed to provide an experimental verification for NLCP model. The paper’s work has solved the contact problem with a high conformal rate and has described the nonlinear relationship between contact pressure and penetration depth. It has great value to the wear analysis of clearance joint.
Keywords
Clearance joint Contact pressure calculation NLCP model Wear calculationNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No: 51175409).
References
- 1.Erkaya, S., Uzmay, I.: Investigation on effect of joint clearance on dynamics of four-bar mechanism. Nonlinear Dyn. 58(1), 179–198 (2009)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Flores, P., Leine, R., Glocker, C.: Modeling and analysis of planar rigid multibody systems with translational clearance joints based on the non-smooth dynamics approach. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 23(23), 165–190 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Flores, P., Koshy, C.S., Lankarani, H.M., et al.: Numerical and experimental investigation on multibody systems with revolute clearance joints. Nonlinear Dyn. 65(4), 383–398 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Askari, E., Flores, P., Dabirrahmani, D., et al.: Nonlinear vibration and dynamics of ceramic on ceramic artificial hip joints: a spatial multibody modeling. Nonlinear Dyn. 76(2), 1–13 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Tian, Q., Liu, C., Machado, M., et al.: A new model for dry and lubricated cylindrical joints with clearance in spatial flexible multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 64(1), 25–47 (2011)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Erkaya, S., Uzmay, I.: Effects of balancing and link flexibility on dynamics of a planar mechanism having joint clearance. Sci. Iran. 19(3), 483–490 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pereira, C.M., Ramalho, A.L., Ambrosio, J.A.: An enhanced cylindrical contact force model. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 35(3), 277–298 (2015)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Askari, E., Flores, P., Dabirrahmani, D., et al.: Dynamic modeling and analysis of wear in spatial hard-on-hard couple hip replacements using multibody systems methodologies. Nonlinear Dyn. 82(1–2), 1039–1058 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Yaqubi, S., Dardel, M., Daniali, H.M., et al.: Modeling and control of crank-slider mechanism with multiple clearance joints. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 36(2), 1–25 (2015)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Varedi-Koulaei, S.M., Daniali, H.M., Farajtabar, M., et al.: Reducing the undesirable effects of joints clearance on the behavior of the planar 3-RRR parallel manipulators. Nonlinear Dyn. 86(2), 1–16 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Askari, E., Flores, P., Dabirrahmani, D., et al.: A computational analysis of squeaking hip prostheses. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 10(2), 024502 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Johnson, K.L., Johnsonm, K.L.: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
- 13.Machado, M., Moreira, P., Flores, P., et al.: Compliant contact force models in multibody dynamics: evolution of the Hertz contact theory. Mech. Mach. Theory 53, 99–121 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ma, J., Qian, L., Chen, G.: Parameter estimation of the Lankarani–Nikravesh contact force model using a new modified linear method. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
- 15.Hunt, K.H., Crossley, F.R.E.: Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. J. Appl. Mech. 42(2), 440–445 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Herbert, R.G., Mcwhannell, D.C.: Shape and frequency composition of pulses from an impact pair. J. Eng. Ind. 99(3), 663–671 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems. J. Mech. Des. 112(3), 369–376 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: Continuous contact force models for impact analysis in multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 5(2), 193–207 (1994)Google Scholar
- 19.Bai, Z., Zhao, Y.: A hybrid contact force model of revolute joint with clearance for planar mechanical systems. Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 48(48), 15–36 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Muvengei, O., Kihiu, J., Ikua, B.: Dynamic analysis of planar rigid-body mechanical systems with two-clearance revolute joints. Nonlinear Dyn. 73(1–2), 259–273 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Chen, Z.: Dynamic analysis of a 3-RRR parallel mechanism with multiple clearance joints. Mech. Mach. Theory 78(78), 105–115 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Pereira, C.M., Ramalho, A.L., Ambrósio, J.A.: A critical overview of internal and external cylinder contact force models. Nonlinear Dyn. 63(4), 681–697 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Flodin, A., Andersson, S.: Simulation of mild wear in spur gears. Wear 207(1–2), 16–23 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Põdra, P., Andersson, S.: Wear simulation with the Winkler surface model. Wear 207(1), 79–85 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Liu, C.S., Zhang, K., Yang, R.: The FEM analysis and approximate model for cylindrical joints with clearances. Mech. Mach. Theory 42(2), 183–197 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Su, Y., Chen, W., Guo, C.: Wear prediction of clearance revolute joints using winkler surface model. Mocaxue Xuebao/Tribology 32(4), 320–324 (2012). http://www.tribology.com.cn/ch/reader/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20120402&year_id=2012&quarter_id=4&falg=1
- 27.Li, P., Chen, W., Zhu, A.: An improved practical model for wear prediction of revolute clearance joints in crank slider mechanisms. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 56(12), 2953–2963 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Flores, P., Sio, J., Claro, J., et al.: Influence of the contact-impact force model on the dynamic response of multi-body systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K J. Multibody Dyn. 220(1), 21–34 (2006)Google Scholar
- 29.Hertz, H.: On the contact of solids—on the contact of rigid elastic solids and on hardness (Translated by DE Jones and GA Schott). Miscellaneous Papers (1896)Google Scholar
- 30.Goldsmith, W., Frasier, J.T.: Impact: the theory and physical behavior of colliding solids. J. Appl. Mech. 28, 639 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Bai, Z.F., Zhao, Y., Chen, J.: Dynamics analysis of planar mechanical system considering revolute clearance joint wear. Tribol. Int. 64(3), 85–95 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Flores, P.: Modeling and simulation of wear in revolute clearance joints in multibody systems. Mech. Mach. Theory 44(6), 1211–1222 (2009)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Shen, X., Cao, L., Li, R.: Numerical simulation of sliding wear based on Archard model. In: International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, pp. 325–329 (2010). doi: 10.1109/MACE.2010.5535855
- 34.Archard, J.F.: Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 24(8), 981–988 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar