Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 64, Issue 1–2, pp 97–115 | Cite as

Computational dynamics of a 3D elastic string pendulum attached to a rigid body and an inertially fixed reel mechanism

Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

A high fidelity model is developed for an elastic string pendulum, one end of which is attached to a rigid body while the other end is attached to an inertially fixed reel mechanism which allows the unstretched length of the string to be dynamically varied. The string is assumed to have distributed mass and elasticity that permits axial deformations. The rigid body is attached to the string at an arbitrary point, and the resulting string pendulum system exhibits nontrivial coupling between the elastic wave propagation in the string and the rigid body dynamics. Variational methods are used to develop coupled ordinary and partial differential equations of motion. Computational methods, referred to as Lie group variational integrators, are then developed, based on a finite element approximation and the use of variational methods in a discrete-time setting to obtain discrete-time equations of motion. This approach preserves the geometry of the configurations, and leads to accurate and efficient algorithms that have guaranteed accuracy properties that make them suitable for many dynamic simulations, especially over long simulation times. Numerical results are presented for typical examples involving a constant length string, string deployment, and string retrieval. These demonstrate the complicated dynamics that arise in a string pendulum from the interaction of the rigid body motion, elastic wave dynamics in the string, and the disturbances introduced by the reeling mechanism. Such interactions are dynamically important in many engineering problems, but tend be obscured in lower fidelity models.

Keywords

Lagrangian mechanics Geometric integrator Variational integrator String pendulum Reel mechanism Rigid body 

References

  1. 1.
    Chapman, D.: Towed cable behaviour during ship turning maneuvers. Ocean Eng. 11(4), 327–361 (1984) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Driscoll, R., Lueck, R., Nahon, M.: Development and validation of a lumped-mass dynamics model of a deep sea ROV system. Appl. Ocean Res. 22(3), 169–182 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walton, T., Polacheck, H.: Calculation of transient motion of submerged cables. Math. Comput. 14(69), 27–46 (1960) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quadrelli, M.: Modeling and dynamics of tethered formations for space interferometry. In: Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Clearwater, FL (2000) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koh, C., Zhang, Y., Quek, S.: Low-tension cable dynamics: Numerical and experimental studies. J. Eng. Mech. 125(3), 347–354 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuhn, A., Steiner, W., Zemann, J., Dinevski, D., Troger, H.: A comparison of various mathematical formulations and numerical solution methods for the large amplitude oscillations of a string pendulum. Appl. Math. Comput. 67, 227–264 (1995) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buckham, B., Driscoll, F., Nahon, M.: Development of a finite element cable model for use in low-tension dynamics simulation. J. Appl. Mech. 71, 476–485 (2004) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leamy, M., Noor, A., Wasfy, T.: Dynamic simulation of a tethered satellite system using finite elements and fuzzy sets. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190(37–38), 4847–4870 (2001) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steiner, W., Zemann, J., Steindl, A., Trooger, H.: Numerical study of large amplitude oscillations of a two-satellite continuous tether systems with a varying length. Acta Astron. 35(9–11), 607–621 (1995) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krupa, M., Poth, W., Schagerl, M., Steindl, A., Steiner, W., Troger, H.: Modeling, dynamics and control of tethered satellite systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 43, 73–96 (2006) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banerjee, A., Kane, T.: Tether deployment dynamics. J. Astron. Sci. 347–365 (1982) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mankala, K., Agrawal, S.: Dynamic modeling and simulation of satellite tethered systems. J. Vib. Acoust. 127, 144–156 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, T., Leok, M., McClamroch, N.: Dynamics of a 3D elastic string pendulum. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Shanghai, China, pp. 3347–3352 (2009) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marsden, J., Ratiu, T.: Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry, 2nd edn. Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 17. Springer, Berlin (1999) MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crellin, E., Janssens, F., Poelaert, D., Steiner, W., Troger, H.: On balance and variational formulations of the equations of motion of a body deploying along a cable. J. Appl. Mech. 64, 369–374 (1997) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hairer, E., Lubich, C., Wanner, G.: Geometric numerical integration. Springer Series in Computational Mechanics, vol. 31. Springer, Berlin (2000) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, T., Leok, M., McClamroch, N.H.: Lie group variational integrators for the full body problem in orbital mechanics. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 98(2), 121–144 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, T., Leok, M., McClamroch, N.H.: Lie group variational integrators for the full body problem. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 2907–2924 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee, T.: Computational geometric mechanics and control of rigid bodies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan (2008) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, T., Leok, M., McClamroch, N.: Optimal attitude control of a rigid body using geometrically exact computations on SO(3). J. Dyn. Control Syst. 14(4), 465–487 (2008) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leimkuhler, B., Reich, S.: Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics. Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics, vol. 14. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004) MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marsden, J., West, M.: Discrete mechanics and variational integrators. Acta Numer. 10, 317–514 (2001) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iserles, A., Munthe-Kaas, H., Nørsett, S., Zanna, A.: Lie-group methods. Acta Numer. 9, 215–365 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dieci, L., Russell, R., van Vleck, E.: Unitary integrators and applications to continuous orthonormalization techniques. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31(1), 261–281 (1994) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stern, A., Grinspun, E.: Implicit-explicit variational integration of highly oscillatory problems. Multiscale Model. Simul. 7(4), 1779–1794 (2009) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Junge, O., Marsden, J., Ober-Blöbaum, S.: Discrete mechanics and optimal control. In: IFAC Congress, Praha (2005) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taeyoung Lee
    • 1
  • Melvin Leok
    • 2
  • N. Harris McClamroch
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringFlorida Institute of TechnologyMelbourneUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations