Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 62, Issue 1–2, pp 291–303

Minimal formulation of joint motion for biomechanisms

  • Ajay Seth
  • Michael Sherman
  • Peter Eastman
  • Scott Delp
Orignal Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11071-010-9717-3

Cite this article as:
Seth, A., Sherman, M., Eastman, P. et al. Nonlinear Dyn (2010) 62: 291. doi:10.1007/s11071-010-9717-3

Abstract

Biomechanical systems share many properties with mechanically engineered systems, and researchers have successfully employed mechanical engineering simulation software to investigate the mechanical behavior of diverse biological mechanisms, ranging from biomolecules to human joints. Unlike their man-made counterparts, however, biomechanisms rarely exhibit the simple, uncoupled, pure-axial motion that is engineered into mechanical joints such as sliders, pins, and ball-and-socket joints. Current mechanical modeling software based on internal-coordinate multibody dynamics can formulate engineered joints directly in minimal coordinates, but requires additional coordinates restricted by constraints to model more complex motions. This approach can be inefficient, inaccurate, and difficult for biomechanists to customize. Since complex motion is the rule rather than the exception in biomechanisms, the benefits of minimal coordinate modeling are not fully realized in biomedical research. Here we introduce a practical implementation for empirically-defined internal-coordinate joints, which we call “mobilizers.” A mobilizer encapsulates the observations, measurement frame, and modeling requirements into a hinge specification of the permissible-motion manifold for a minimal set of internal coordinates. Mobilizers support nonlinear mappings that are mathematically equivalent to constraint manifolds but have the advantages of fewer coordinates, no constraints, and exact representation of the biomechanical motion-space—the benefits long enjoyed for internal-coordinate models of mechanical joints. Hinge matrices within the mobilizer are easily specified by user-supplied functions, and provide a direct means of mapping permissible motion derived from empirical data. We present computational results showing substantial performance and accuracy gains for mobilizers versus equivalent joints implemented with constraints. Examples of mobilizers for joints from human biomechanics and molecular dynamics are given. All methods and examples were implemented in Simbody™—an open source multibody-dynamics solver available at https://Simtk.org.

Keywords

Multibody dynamics Internal coordinates Computer simulation Biomechanics Molecular dynamics Skeletal modeling 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ajay Seth
    • 1
  • Michael Sherman
    • 1
  • Peter Eastman
    • 1
  • Scott Delp
    • 1
  1. 1.Bioengineering DepartmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations