Aftershock probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (APSHA) has a key role in risk management after a major earthquake. The main goal of the current study is to assess aftershock hazard in a strategic and earthquake-prone region of Iran (Bushehr province). Bushehr province is a strategic region in the Middle East due to its major petroleum export facilities, industrial corridors and the Bushehr nuclear power plant. To prepare APSHA for Bushehr province, a seismic source is selected which surrounds the active faults in the study area. A uniform earthquake catalog is collected which contains information on a total of 1143 earthquakes (Mw > 4) occurred in the study area from 1900 to 2018. Aftershock parameters are calculated using the epidemic-type aftershock sequence model. Aftershock sequences follow a non-homogenous Poisson’s process, and their magnitude and location depend on the size and location of the mainshock. In this study, APSHA is performed for the intervals of 1, 7 and 30 days after the mainshock, by assuming occurrence of mainshocks with return periods of 475 and 2475 years. The results show that the aftershock hazard curve is greater than that of the mainshock hazard curve.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Availability of data and materials
The R package ETAS is available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ETAS and GitHub at https://github.com/jalilian/ETAS (under GPL 2 license). The earthquake catalog is extracted from the data center of International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (http://www.iiees.ac.ir/fa/eqcatalog/).
Epidemic-type aftershock sequence
Aftershock probabilistic seismic hazard analysis
Moment magnitude scale
Abrahamson N, Silva W (2008) Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24(1):67–97. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2924360
Amiri GG, Mahdavian A, Dana FM (2007) Attenuation relationships for Iran. J Earthquake Eng 11(4):469–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601034049
Baker JW (2008) An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. White Paper, Version 1.3. http://www.stanford.edu/~bakerjw/Publications/Baker-(2008)-Intro-to-PSHA-v1-3.pdf
Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):99–138. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2830434
Boyd OS (2012) Including foreshocks and aftershocks in time independent probabilistic seismic hazard analyses. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(3):909–917
Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):139–171. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2857546
Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24(1):173–215. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2894832
Davoudi N, Tavakoli HR, Zare M, Jalilian A (2018) Declustering of Iran earthquake catalog (1983–2017) using the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. Acta Geophys 66(6):1359–1373
Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367
Guo Z, Ogata Y (1997) Statistical relations between the parameters of aftershocks in time, space, and magnitude. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102(B2):2857–2873
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Measurement error models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:185–188
Harte DS (2017) Probability distribution of forecasts based on the ETAS model. Geophys J Int 210(1):90–104
Iervolino I, Giorgio M, Polidoro B (2014) Sequence based probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(2):1006–1012
Jalayer F, Ebrahimian H (2017) Seismic risk assessment considering cumulative damage due to aftershocks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(3):369–389
Jalilian A (2019) ETAS: an R package for fitting the space-time ETAS model to earthquake data. J Stat Softw 88(CN 1):1–39
Jalilian A, Zhuang J (2016) ETAS: modeling earthquake data using ETAS model. R package version 0.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ETAS
Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82(20):2981–2987. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB082i020p02981
Karimiparidari S, Zare M, Memarian H, Kijko A (2013) Iranian earthquakes, a uniform catalog with moment magnitudes. J Seismol 17(3):897–911
Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1989) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I. Utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79(3):645–654
Luen B, Stark PB (2012) Poisson tests of declusteredcatalogs. Geophys J Int 189(1):691–700
Marzocchi W, Lombardi AM (2009) Real time forecasting following a damaging earthquake. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040233
Mirzaei N, Gao M, Chen YT (1999) Delineation of potential seismic sources for seismic zoning of Iran. J Seismol 3(1):17–30
Moinfar AA, Naderzadeh A, Nabavi MH (2012) New Iranian seismic hazard zoning map for new edition of seismic code and its comparison with neighbor countries. In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering
Ogata Y (1998) Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences. Ann Inst Stat Math 50(2):379–402
Ogata Y, Katsura K (2006) Immediate and updated forecasting of aftershock hazard. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025888
Omi T, Ogata Y, Hirata Y, Aihara K (2013) Forecasting large aftershocks within one day after the main shock. Sci Rep Nat 3:2218. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02218
Omi T, Ogata Y, Hirata Y, Aihara K (2015) Intermediate term forecasting of aftershocks from an early aftershock sequence: Bayesian and ensemble forecasting approaches. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120(4):2561–2578
Ommi S, Zafarani H (2018) Probabilistic aftershock hazard analysis, two case studies in West and Northwest Iran. J Seismol 22(1):137–152
Ommi S, Zafarani H, Zare M (2016a) Aftershock decay rates in the Iranian plateau. Pure Appl Geophys 173(7):2305–2324
Ommi S, Zafarani H, Smirnov VB (2016b) Bayesian estimation of the Modified Omori Law parameters for the Iranian plateau. J Seismol 20(3):953–970
Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity 1969–1982. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 90:5479–5495
Shahvar MP, Zare M, Castellaro S (2013) A unified seismic catalog for the Iranian plateau (1900–2011). Seismol Res Lett 84(2):233–249
Tavakoli B, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (1999) Seismic hazard assessment of Iran. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3781
Van Stiphout T, Zhuang J, Marsan D (2012) Seismicity declustering. Community Online Resour Stat Seism Anal. https://doi.org/10.5078/corssa-52382934
Wiemer S (2000) Introducing probabilistic aftershock hazard mapping. Geophys Res Lett Solid Earth 27(20):3405–3408. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011479
Wiemer S, Katsumata K (1999) Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershock zones. J Geophys Res [Solid Earth] 104(B6):13135–13151. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900032
Yazdi P, Santoyo MA, Gaspar-Escribano JM (2018) Analysis of the 2012 Ahar-Varzeghan (Iran) seismic sequence: insights from statistical and stress transfer modeling. Glob Planet Change Sci Direct 161:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.12.007
Yeo GL, Cornell CA (2005) Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering, PEER Report 2005/13. College of Engineering, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
Yeo GL, Cornell CA (2009) A probabilistic framework for quantification of aftershock ground motion hazard in California: methodology and parametric study. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(1):45–60
Zare M, Amini H, Yazdi P, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu MB, Kalafat D, Erdik M, Giardini D, Asif Khan M, Tsereteli N (2014) Recent developments of the Middle East catalog. J Seismol 18(4):749–772
Zhuang J (2011) Next-day earthquake forecasts for the Japan region generated by the ETAS model. Earth, Planets and Space 63(3):5
Zhuang J, Ogata Y, Vere-Jones D (2002) Stochastic declustering of space-time earthquake occurrences. J Am Stat As 97(458):369–380
Zhuang J, Ogata Y, Vere-Jones D (2004) Analyzing earthquake clustering features by using stochastic reconstruction. J Geophys Res [Solid Earth]. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002879
Zhuang J, Ogata Y, Vere-Jones D (2006) Diagnostic analysis of space-time branching processes for earthquakes. In: Baddeley A, Gregori P, Mateu J, Stoica R, Stoyan D (eds) Case studies in spatial point process modeling, Lecture notes in statistics, vol 185. Springer, New York, pp 275–292
We wish to thank Mohammad Shahvar for his help in providing the magnitude conversation relations. We also acknowledge the help of R. Goodarzi and S.M. Hosseini in editing of figures.
This research was funded by the Babol Noshirvani University of Technology under the Grant No. BUT/388011/97.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Davoudi, N., Tavakoli, H.R., Zare, M. et al. Aftershock probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bushehr province in Iran using ETAS model. Nat Hazards 100, 1159–1170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03854-8
- Seismic hazard analysis
- Bushehr province of Iran
- ETAS model