Quantitative mapping of precursory seismicity rate changes along the Indonesian island chain
- 28 Downloads
In this study, the possibility of detecting a significant seismicity rate change prior to a hazardous earthquake was examined along the Indonesian Sunda margin (ISM), Indonesia, using the seismological Z value method. The completeness inter- and intraplate seismicity data with a Mw ≥ 4.0 recorded during 1980–2016 was the dataset analyzed in this study. Based on an iterative test with 13 major or great earthquake case studies, the most suitable free parameters for detecting the precursory seismic quiescence by Z value analysis along the ISM were N = 25 events and Tw = 2.5 years. Investigation of the Z value in both temporal variation and spatial distribution revealed at least seven areas along the ISM with prominent Z value anomalies that are still quiescent from any hazardous earthquake and so are potential earthquake sources. These are northern and southern Praya, northern and southern Bajawa, eastern Dili, southern Ambon and southeastern Palu. Three of these seven areas (northern Praya, northern Bajawa and southwestern Pala) conform fairly well to the previously proposed eight risk areas in the Indonesian island chain derived from analysis of the b value of the frequency–magnitude distribution model. Therefore, it is concluded that there is a high possibility in the near future of seismic and/or tsunami hazard impact in the Indonesian island chain due to ISM seismic activities.
KeywordsEarthquake catalog Seismicity rate change Z value Earthquake forecasting Indonesian Sunda margin
This Research is funded by Chulalongkorn University: CU-GR_62_22_23_07. Thanks are extended to T. Pailoplee for the preparation of the draft manuscript and the Office of Research Affairs, Chulalongkorn University, for a critical review and improved English. The thoughtful comments and suggestions by the editors and anonymous reviewers that enhanced the quality of this manuscript significantly are acknowledged.
- Charusiri P, Pailoplee S (2015) Investigations of tsunamogenic sources in Mainland Southeast Asia: implication from seismicity. Unisearch J 2(1):9–12Google Scholar
- Gambino S, Laudani L, Magiagle S (2014) Seismicity pattern changes before the M = 4.8 Aeolian Archipelago (Italy) earthquake of August 16, 2010. Sci World J 2014: Article ID 531212Google Scholar
- Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(1):363–367Google Scholar
- Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:185–188Google Scholar
- Katsumata K (2003) Precursory seismic quiescence before the M w= 8.3 Tokachi-oki, Japan, earthquake on 26 September 2003 revealed by a re-examined earthquake catalog. J Geophys Res 116:B10307-1-16Google Scholar
- Krabbenhoeft A, Weinrebe RW, Kopp H, Flueh ER, Ladage S, Papenberg C, Planert L, Djajadihardja Y (2010) Bathymetry of the Indonesian S. Sunda margin-relating morphological features of the upper plate slopes to the location and extent of the seismogenic zone. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1899–1911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Natawidjaja D, Sieh K, Galetzka J, Suwargadi BW, Cheng HE, Lawrence R, Mohamed C (2007) Interseismic deformation above the Sunda Megathrust recorded in coral microatolls of the Mentawai islands, West Sumatra. J Geophys Res 112(B2): Art. No. B02404. ISSN 0148-0227Google Scholar
- Rudolf-Navarro AH, MuñoZ Diosdado A, Angulo-Brown F (2010) Seismic quiescence patterns as possible precursors of great earthquakes in Mexico. Int J Phys Sci 5(6):651–670Google Scholar
- Sobolev GA (1995) Fundamental of earthquake prediction. Electromagnetic Research Center, Moscow, p 162pGoogle Scholar
- Wiemer S, Wyss M (1994) Seismic quiescence before the Landers (M = 7.5) and Big Bear (M = 6.5) 1992 earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:900–916Google Scholar
- Wyss M (1991) Reporting history of the central Aleutians seismograph network and the quiescence preceding the 1986 Andreanof Island earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:1231–1254Google Scholar