Advertisement

A review of the community flood risk management literature in the USA: lessons for improving community resilience to floods

  • Jenna TylerEmail author
  • Abdul-Akeem Sadiq
  • Douglas S. Noonan
Original Paper
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

This study systematically reviews the diverse body of research on community flood risk management in the USA to identify knowledge gaps and develop innovative and practical lessons to aid flood management decision-makers in their efforts to reduce flood losses. The authors discovered and reviewed 60 studies that met the selection criteria (e.g., study is written in English, is empirical, focuses on flood risk management at the community level in the USA, etc.). Upon reviewing the major findings from each study, the authors identified seven practical lessons that, if implemented, could not only help flood management decision-makers better understand communities’ flood risks, but could also reduce the impacts of flood disasters and improve communities’ resilience to future flood disasters. These seven lessons include: (1) recognizing that acquiring open space and conserving wetlands are some of the most effective approaches to reducing flood losses; (2) recognizing that, depending on a community’s flood risks, different development patterns are more effective at reducing flood losses; (3) considering the costs and benefits of participating in FEMA’s Community Rating System program; (4) engaging community members in the flood planning and recovery processes; (5) considering socially vulnerable populations in flood risk management programs; (6) relying on a variety of floodplain management tools to delineate flood risk; and (7) ensuring that flood mitigation plans are fully implemented and continually revised.

Keywords

Flood risk Community flood risk management Community resilience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is based on research funded by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant No. 1635381. The findings and opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the NSF. The authors are grateful to Drs. Sam Brody, Jeffrey Czajkowski, Meri Davlasheridze, Wesley Highfield, Craig Landry, and Sammy Zahran for reviewing our list of studies to be included in this review.

References

  1. Albright EA, Crow DA (2015a) Learning in the aftermath of extreme floods: community damage and stakeholder perceptions of future risk. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 6(3):308–328Google Scholar
  2. Albright EA, Crow DA (2015b) Learning processes, public and stakeholder engagement: analyzing responses to Colorado’s extreme flood events of 2013. Urban Clim 14(1):79–93Google Scholar
  3. Asche EA (2013) The effect of flood risk on housing choices and community hazard mitigation. Dissertation, University of California Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  4. Association of State Floodplain Managers (2010) Model job description for a community floodplain manager. https://www.floods.org/ace-files/documentlibrary/CFM/FPM_Model_Job_Description_2010.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018
  5. Bailey LK (2017) Exploring the barriers to effective federal flood mitigation in the Mississippi River region. Dissertation, University of LouisvilleGoogle Scholar
  6. Berke PR, Lyles W, Smith G (2014) Impacts of federal and state hazard mitigation policies on local land use policy. J Plan Educ Res 34(1):60–76Google Scholar
  7. Blessing R, Sebastian A, Brody SD (2017) Flood risk delineation in the United States: how much loss are we capturing? Nat Hazards Rev 18(3):1–10Google Scholar
  8. Bouwer LM (2011) Have disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 92(1):39–46Google Scholar
  9. Brody SD, Highfield WE (2013) Open space protection and flood mitigation: a national study. Land Use Policy 32:89–95Google Scholar
  10. Brody SD, Highfield WE, Ryu HC, Spanel-Weber L (2007a) Examining the relationship between wetland alteration and watershed flooding in Texas and Florida. Nat Hazards 40(2):413–428Google Scholar
  11. Brody SD, Zahran S, Highfield WE, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2007b) Identifying the impact of the built environment on flood damage in Texas. Disasters 32(1):1–18Google Scholar
  12. Brody SD, Zahran S, Maghelal P, Grover H, Highfield WE (2007c) The rising costs of floods: examining the impact of planning and development decisions on property damage in Florida. J Am Plann As 73(3):330–345Google Scholar
  13. Brody SD, Davis SE III, Highfield WE, Bernhardt SP (2008) A spatial-temporal analysis of section 404 wetland permitting in Texas and Florida: thirteen years of impact along the coast. Wetlands 28(1):107–116Google Scholar
  14. Brody SD, Bernhardt SP, Zahran S, Kang JE (2009a) Evaluating local flood mitigation strategies in Texas and Florida. Built Environ 35(4):492–515Google Scholar
  15. Brody SD, Zahran S, Highfield WE, Bernhardt SP, Vedlitz A (2009b) Policy learning for flood mitigation: a longitudinal assessment of the community rating system in Florida. Risk Anal 29(6):912–929Google Scholar
  16. Brody SD, Kang JE, Bernhardt S (2010) Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: the role of organizational capacity. Nat Hazards 52(1):167–184Google Scholar
  17. Brody SD, Gunn J, Peacock W, Highfield WE (2011) Examining the influence of development patterns on flood damages along the Gulf of Mexico. J Plan Educ Res 31(4):438–448Google Scholar
  18. Brody SD, Blessing R, Sebastian A, Bedient P (2012a) Delineating the reality of flood risk and loss in Southeast Texas. Nat Hazards Rev 14(2):89–97Google Scholar
  19. Brody SD, Peacock WG, Gunn J (2012b) Ecological indicators of flood risk along the Gulf of Mexico. Ecol Indic 18:493–500Google Scholar
  20. Brody SD, Kim H, Gunn J (2013) Examining the impacts of development patterns on flooding on the Gulf of Mexico coast. Urban Stud 50(4):789–806Google Scholar
  21. Brody SD, Blessing R, Sebastian A, Bedient P (2014) Examining the impact of land use/land cover characteristics on flood losses. J Environ Plan Manag 57(8):1252–1265Google Scholar
  22. Brody SD, Highfield WE, Blessing R (2015a) An analysis of the effects of land use and land cover on flood losses along the Gulf of Mexico coast from 1999 to 2009. J Am Water Resour As 51(6):1556–1567Google Scholar
  23. Brody SD, Sebastian A, Blessing R, Bedient PB (2015b) Case study results from southeast Houston, Texas: identifying the impacts of residential location on flood risk and loss. J Flood Risk Manag 51(11):5110–5120Google Scholar
  24. Brody SD, Highfield WE, Blessing R, Makino T, Shepard CC (2017) Evaluating the effects of open space configurations in reducing flood damage along the Gulf of Mexico coast. Landsc Urban Plan 167:225–231Google Scholar
  25. Bubeck P, Botzen WJ, Aerts JC (2012) A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Anal 32(9):1481–1495Google Scholar
  26. Burby RJ (2006) Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 604:171–191Google Scholar
  27. Burby RJ, French SP (1981) Coping with floods: the land use management paradox. J Am Plan As 47(3):289–300Google Scholar
  28. Calil J, Beck MW, Gleason M, Merrifield M, Klausmeyer K, Newkirk S (2015) Aligning natural resource conservation and flood hazard mitigation in California. PLoS ONE 10(7):1–14Google Scholar
  29. Chakraborty J, Collins TW, Montgomery MC, Grineski SE (2014) Social and spatial inequities in exposure to flood risk in Miami, Florida. Nat Hazards Rev 15(3):1–10Google Scholar
  30. Cigler BA (2017) US floods: the necessity of mitigation. State Local Gov Rev 49(2):127–139Google Scholar
  31. Consoer M, Milman A (2017) Opportunities, constraints, and choices for flood mitigation in rural areas: perspectives of municipalities in Massachusetts. J Flood Risk Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12302 Google Scholar
  32. Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18(4):598–606Google Scholar
  33. Deegan MA (2007) Exploring US flood mitigation policies: a feedback view of system behavior. Dissertation, State University of New York at AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  34. Eisenman DP, Cordasco KM, Asch S, Golden JF, Glik D (2007) Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health 97(1):109–115Google Scholar
  35. Esnard AM, Brower D, Bortz B (2001) Coastal Hazards and the built environment on Barrier Islands: a retrospective view of Nags Head in the late 1990s. Coast Manag 29(1):53–72Google Scholar
  36. Fan Q, Davlasheridze M (2014) Evaluating the effectiveness of flood mitigation policies in the US. Conference paper, Agricultural and applied economics association annual conferenceGoogle Scholar
  37. Fan Q, Davlasheridze M (2015) Flood risk, flood mitigation, and location choice: evaluating the national flood insurance program’s community rating system. Risk Anal 36(6):1125–1147Google Scholar
  38. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2014a) For communities plagued by repeated flooding, property acquisition may be the answer. https://www.fema.gov/news-release/2014/05/28/communities-plagued-repeated-flooding-property-acquisition-may-be-answer. Accessed on 31 Jan 2019
  39. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2014b) Homeowner flood insurance affordability act of 2014. https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/95946. Accessed on 31 Jan 2019
  40. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2015) FEMA hazard mitigation assistance brochures. https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/107704. Accessed on 7 April 2018
  41. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2017) Flood zones. https://www.fema.gov/flood-zones. Accessed on 7 April 2018
  42. Gall M, Boruff BJ, Cutter SL (2007) Assessing flood hazard zones in the absence of digital floodplain maps: comparison of alternative approaches. Nat Hazards Rev 8(1):1–12Google Scholar
  43. Gallagher J (2014) Learning about an infrequent event: evidence from flood insurance take-up in the United States. Am Econ J Appl Econ 6(3):206–233Google Scholar
  44. Galloway GE (2008) Flood risk management in the United States and the impact of Hurricane Katrina. Int J River Basin Manag 6(4):301–306Google Scholar
  45. Grigg NS, Doesken NJ, Frick DM, Grimm M, Hilmes M, McKee TB, Oltjenbruns KA (1999) Fort Collins flood 1997: comprehensive view of an extreme event. J Water Res Plan Man 125(5):255–262Google Scholar
  46. Haddow G, Bullock J, Coppola DP (2011) Introduction to emergency management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Highfield WE, Brody SD (2006) Price of permits: measuring the economic impacts of wetland development on flood damages in Florida. Nat Hazards Rev 7(3):123–130Google Scholar
  48. Highfield WE, Brody SD (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of local mitigation activities in reducing flood losses. Nat Hazards Rev 14(4):229–236Google Scholar
  49. Highfield WE, Brody SD (2017) Determining the effects of the FEMA community rating system program on flood losses in the United States. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 21:396–404Google Scholar
  50. Highfield WE, Brody SD, Blessing R (2014) Measuring the impact of mitigation activities on flood loss reduction at the parcel level: the case of the clear creek watershed on the upper Texas coast. Nat Hazards 74(2):687–704Google Scholar
  51. Holway JM, Burby RJ (1993) Reducing flood losses local planning and land use controls. J Am Plan As 59(2):205–216Google Scholar
  52. Horn D, Brown JT (2018) Introduction to FEMA’s national flood insurance program (NFIP). Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R44593.pdf Accessed 1 Oct 2018
  53. Horritt MS, Bates PD (2001) Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow. J Hydrol 253(1–4):239–249Google Scholar
  54. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Jongman B, Winsemius HC, Fraser SA, Muise SM (2018) Assessment and adaptation to climate change—related flood risks. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science. http://oxfordre.com/naturalhazardscience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389407-e-278?print=pdf Accessed 17 Jan 2019
  56. Kang JE (2009) Mitigating flood loss through local comprehensive planning in Florida. Dissertation, Texas A&M UniversityGoogle Scholar
  57. Kellens W, Terpstra T, De Maeyer P (2013) Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. Risk Anal 33(1):24–49Google Scholar
  58. Kick EL, Fraser JC, Fulkerson GM, McKinney LA, De Vries DH (2011) Repetitive flood victims and acceptance of FEMA mitigation offers: an analysis with community–system policy implications. Disasters 35(3):510–539Google Scholar
  59. Kousky C, Kunreuther H (2010) Improving flood insurance and flood-risk management: insights from St. Louis, Missouri. Nat Hazards Rev 11(4):162–172Google Scholar
  60. Kousky C, Walls M (2014) Floodplain conservation as a flood mitigation strategy: examining costs and benefits. Ecol Econ 104:119–128Google Scholar
  61. Landry CE, Li J (2011) Participation in the community rating system of NFIP: empirical analysis of North Carolina counties. Nat Hazards Rev 13(3):205–220Google Scholar
  62. Lathrop R, Auermuller L, Trimble J, Bognar J (2014) The application of WebGIS tools for visualizing coastal flooding vulnerability and planning for resiliency: the New Jersey experience. Int J Geo-Inf 3(2):408–429Google Scholar
  63. Li J (2012) Community flood hazard mitigation and the community rating system of national flood insurance program. Dissertation, East Carolina State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  64. Li J, Landry CE (2018) Flood risk, local hazard mitigation, and the community rating system of the national flood insurance program. Land Econ 94(2):175–198Google Scholar
  65. Lufoff AE, Wilkinson KP (1979) Participation in the national flood insurance program: a study of community activeness. Rural Sociol 44(1):137Google Scholar
  66. Mees H, Tempels B, Crabbé A, Boelens L (2016) Shifting public-private responsibilities in Flemish flood risk management. Towards a co-evolutionary approach. Land Use Policy 57:23–33Google Scholar
  67. Mittler E, Morgan L, Shapiro M, Grill KY (2006) State roles and responsibilities in the national flood insurance program. American Institutes for Research. https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/disasters/insurance/nfip_eval_state_roles.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018
  68. Mogollón B, Frimpong EA, Hoegh AB, Angermeier PL (2016) An empirical assessment of which inland floods can be managed. J Environ Manag 167(1):38–48Google Scholar
  69. Moore DE, Cantrell RL (1976) Community response to external demands: an analysis of participation in the federal flood insurance program. Rural Sociol 41(4):484Google Scholar
  70. Morrison A, Westbrook CJ, Noble BF (2017) A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature. J Flood Risk Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12315 Google Scholar
  71. National Weather Service (2017) Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/events/US/1980-2017. Accessed on 15 Jan 2018
  72. Noonan DA, Sadiq AA (2017) Flood risk management: exploring the impacts of the community rating system program on poverty and income inequality. Risk Anal 38(3):489–503Google Scholar
  73. Olsen VBK (2014) Proposing a realistic interactive visualization model and testing its effectiveness in communicating flood risk. Dissertation, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  74. Paille M, Reams M, Argote J, Lam NSN, Kirby R (2016) Influences on adaptive planning to reduce flood risks among parishes in South Louisiana. Water 8(2):1–14Google Scholar
  75. Patterson LA, Doyle MW (2009) Assessing effectiveness of national flood policy through spatiotemporal monitoring of socioeconomic exposure. J Am Water Resour As 45(1):237–252Google Scholar
  76. Paul M, Milman AA (2017) A question of ‘fit’: local perspectives on top-down flood mitigation policies in Vermont. J Environ Plan Manag 60(12):2217–2233Google Scholar
  77. Pew Charitable Trusts (2018). Where it rains, it floods: nationwide disasters underscore the need for flood policy overhaul. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2018/01/25/where-it-rains-it-floods. Accessed 1 Oct 2018
  78. Pielke RA Jr, Downton MW (2000) Precipitation and damaging floods: trends in the United States, 1932–97. J Climate 13(20):3625–3637Google Scholar
  79. Posey J (2009) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the municipal level: evidence from floodplain management programs in the United States. Global Environ Change 19(4):482–493Google Scholar
  80. Sadiq AA (2017) Determinants of organizational preparedness for floods: US employees’ perceptions. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 8(1):28–47Google Scholar
  81. Sadiq AA, Noonan DS (2015a) Local capacity and resilience to flooding: community responsiveness to the community ratings system program incentives. Nat Hazards 78(2):1413–1428Google Scholar
  82. Sadiq AA, Noonan DS (2015b) Flood disaster management policy: an analysis of the United States community ratings system. J Nat Resour Policy Res 7(1):5–22Google Scholar
  83. Sadiq AA, Tyler J, Noonan DS, Norton RK, Cunniff SE, Czajkowski J (2018) A review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Community Rating System program. Risk Management and Decision Processes Center. https://riskcenter.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/WP201804_CRS-Literature-Review_Sadiq-etal.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2019
  84. Strother L (2016) The national flood insurance program: a case study in policy failure, reform, and retrenchment. Policy Stud J.  https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12189 Google Scholar
  85. Thompson RR, Garfin DR, Silver RC (2017) Evacuation from natural disasters: a systematic review of the literature. Risk Anal 37(4):812–839Google Scholar
  86. Tyler J (2018) The relationship between the community rating system program and business disaster recovery. Natural Hazards Center. https://hazards.colorado.edu/quick-response-report/the-relationship-between-the-community-rating-system-program-and-business-disaster-recovery. Accessed 1 Oct 2018
  87. Tyler J, Sadiq AA (2018) Business disaster continuity and recovery in the aftermath of Hurricane Irma: exploring whether community-level mitigation activities make a difference. Nat Hazards Rev 20(1):1–12Google Scholar
  88. Zahran S, Brody SD, Peacock WG, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood casualties in Texas. Disasters 32(4):537–560Google Scholar
  89. Zahran S, Weiler S, Brody SD, Lindell MK, Highfield WE (2009) Modeling national flood insurance policy holding at the county scale in Florida, 1999–2005. Ecol Econ 68(10):2627–2636Google Scholar
  90. Zahran S, Brody SD, Highfield WE, Vedlitz A (2010) Non-linear incentives, plan design, and flood mitigation: the case of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s community rating system. J Environ Plan Manag 53(2):219–239Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenna Tyler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdul-Akeem Sadiq
    • 1
  • Douglas S. Noonan
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Public AdministrationUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations