High-resolution coastal hazard assessment along the French Riviera from co-seismic tsunamis generated in the Ligurian fault system

  • Fatemeh Nemati
  • Stephan T. GrilliEmail author
  • Mansour Ioualalen
  • Laurie Boschetti
  • Christophe Larroque
  • Jenny Trevisan
Original Paper


The French Riviera is a densely populated and touristic coast. It is also one of the most seismically active areas of the Western Mediterranean. This is evidenced by the Mw 6.7–6.9, 1887 earthquake and tsunami, that was triggered nearshore, rupturing the easternmost 40 km of the 80-km-long Ligurian fault system, which runs parallel to and offshore of the Riviera. Here, coastal hazard from co-seismic tsunamis is assessed along the French and part of the Italian Riviera by simulating three Ligurian earthquake scenarios: (1) the 1887 event offshore Genoa, Italy; (2) a similar event transposed to the westernmost 40-km segment of the fault, offshore Nice, France; and (3) the rupture of the entire 80-km fault, which constitutes an extreme case scenario for the region. Simulations of tsunami propagation and coastal impact are performed by one-way coupling with the Boussinesq model FUNWAVE-TVD, in a series of nested grids, using new high-resolution bathymetric and topographic data. Results obtained in 10-m coastal grids provide the highest resolution predictions to date for this section of the French Riviera of co-seismic tsunami coastal hazard, in terms of inundation, runup, and current velocity. In general, the most impacted areas are bays (near Cap d’Antibes and Cap Ferrat), due to wave buildup and shoaling within semi-enclosed shallow areas, enhanced by possible resonances. In contrast to earlier work, which was based on coarser resolution grids, the area of Nice harbor is found to be rather well sheltered. It should be noted that uniform fault slip was used in the ruptures and runup estimates could locally be enhanced in case of more complex ruptures, such as segmented and heterogeneous ruptures.


French Riviera 1887 earthquake Tsunami hazard mapping FUNWAVE-TVD 



Fatima Nemati and Stephan Grilli acknowledge support for this work from the US National Science Foundation Grant CMMI-15-35568. Mansour Ioualalen and colleagues from Géoazur acknowledge support from: (1) the European Commission under the project “Assessment, STrategy And Risk Reduction for Tsunamis in Europe,” ASTARTE (Grant No. 603839), and (2) the French government, through the UCA-JEDI Investments managed by the French National Research Agency (ANR-15-IDEX-01).


  1. Alasset PJ, Hébert H, Maouche S, Calbini V, Meghraoui M (2006) The tsunami induced by the 2003 Zemmouri earthquake (Mw = 6.9, Algeria): modelling and results. Geophys J Int 166(1):213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys NN (1960) The seismic sea wave of July 9, 1956 in the Greek archipelago. J Geophys Res 65:1257–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assier-Rzadkiewicz S, Heinrich P, Sabatier PC, Savoye B, Bourillet JF (2000) Numerical modeling of a landslide-generated tsunami: the 1979 Nice event. Pure appl Geophys 157:1707–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Béthoux N, Fréchet J, Guyoton F, Thouvenot F, Cattaneo F, Nicolas M, Granet M (1992) A closing Ligurian sea. Pure appl Geophys 139:179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Day SJ, Watts P, Grilli ST, Kirby JT (2005) Mechanical models of the 1975 Kalapana, Hawaii earthquake and tsunami. Mar Geol 215(1–2):59–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denza PF (1887) Osservazioni fatte all’Osservatoria di Moncalieri sul terremoto del 23 Febbrario 1887. Bolletino Mensuale dell’Osservatorio Centrale Moncalieri 2(7):68–70Google Scholar
  7. Eva C, Rabinovich AB (1997) The February 23, 1887 tsunami recorded on the Ligurian coast, western Mediterranean. Geophys Res Lett 24:2211–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eva E, Solarino S, Spallarossa D (2001) Seismicity and crustal structure beneath the western Ligurian Sea derived from local earthquake tomography. Tectonophysics 339:495–510. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrari G (1991) The 1887 Ligurian earthquake: a detailed study from contemporary scientific observations. Tectonophysics 193:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glimsdal S, Pedersen GK, Harbitz CB, Løvholt F (2013) Dispersion of tsunamis: does it really matter? Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1507–1526. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grilli S, Ioualalen M, Asavanant J, Shi F, Kirby JT, Watts P (2007) Source constraints and model simulation of the December 26, 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng 133(6):414–428. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grilli ST, Dubosq S, Pophet N, Pérignon Y, Kirby JT, Shi F (2010) Numerical simulation and first-order hazard analysis of large co-seismic tsunamis generated in the Puerto Rico trench: near-field impact on the North shore of Puerto Rico and far-field impact on the US East Coast. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:2109–2125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grilli ST, Harris JC, Tajalibakhsh T, Masterlark TL, Kyriakopoulos C, Kirby JT, Shi F (2013) Numerical simulation of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami based on a new transient FEM co-seismic source: comparison to far- and near-field observations. Pure appl Geophys 170:1333–1359. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grilli ST, O’Reilly C, Harris JC, TajalliBakhsh T, Tehranirad B, Banihashemi S, Kirby JT, Baxter CDP, Eggeling T, Ma G, Shi F (2015) Modeling of SMF tsunami hazard along the upper US East Coast: detailed impact around Ocean City, MD. Nat Hazards 76(2):705–746. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grilli ST, Grilli AR, David E, Coulet C (2016) Tsunami hazard assessment along the north shore of Hispaniola from far- and near-field Atlantic sources. Nat Hazards 82(2):777–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grilli ST, Shelby M, Kimmoun O, Dupont G, Nicolsky D, Ma G, Kirby J, Shi F (2017) Modeling coastal tsunami hazard from submarine mass failures: effect of slide rheology, experimental validation, and case studies off the US East coast. Nat Hazards 86(1):353–391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidarzadeh M, Satake K (2013) The 21 May 2003 tsunami in the Western Mediterranean Sea: statistical and wavelet analyses. Pure appl Geophys 170(9):1449–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heidarzadeh M, Necmioglu O, Ishibe T, Yalciner AC (2017) Bodrum-Kos (Turkey-Greece) Mw 6.6 earthquake and tsunami of 20 July 2017: a test for the Mediterranean tsunami warning system. Geosci Lett 4:31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ioualalen M, Asavanant J, Kaewbanjak N, Grilli ST, Kirby JT, Watts P (2007) Modeling of the 26th December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: case study of impact in Thailand. J Geophys Res, Oceans 112:C07024. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ioualalen M, Migeon S, Sardou O (2010) Landslide tsunami vulnerability in the Ligurian Sea: case study of the 1979 October 16 Nice international airport submarine landslide and of identified geological mass failures. Geophys J Int 181:724–740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ioualalen M, Larroque C, Scotti O, Daubord C (2014) Tsunami mapping related to local earthquakes on the French-Italian Riviera (western Mediterranean). Pure appl Geophys 171(7):1423–1443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ioualalen M, Pelletier B, Solis Gordillo GX (2017) Investigating the March 28th 1875 and the September 20th 1920 earthquakes/tsunamis of the Southern Vanuatu arc, offshore Loyalty Islands, New Caledonia. Tectonophysics.
  23. Kirby JT, Shi F, Tehranirad B, Harris JC, Grilli ST (2013) Dispersive tsunami waves in the ocean: model equations and sensitivity to dispersion and Coriolis effects. Ocean Model 62:39–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Labbé M, Donnadieu C, Daubord C, Hebert H (2012) Refined numerical modeling of the 1979 tsunami in Nice (French Riviera): comparison with coastal data. J Geophys Res 117:F01008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lambert J, Terrier M (2011) Historical tsunami database for France and its overseas territories. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1037–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larroque C, Béthoux N, Calais E, Courboulex F, Deschamps A, Deverchère J, Stéphan JF, Ritz JF, Gilli E (2001) Active and recent deformation at the Southern Alps-Ligurian basin junction. Neth J Geosci Geologie en Mijnbouw 80:255–272Google Scholar
  27. Larroque C, Delouis B, Godel B, Nocquet J-M (2009) Active deformation at the southwestern Alps-Ligurian basin junction (France-Italy boundary): evidence for recent change from compression to extension in the Argentera massif. Tectonophysics 467:1–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larroque C, Scotti O, Ioualalen M (2012) Reappraisal of the 1887 Ligurian earthquake (western Mediterranean) from macroseismicity, active tectonics and tsunami modelling. J. Int, Geophys. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madsen PA, Fuhrman DR, Schaffer HA (2008) On the solitary wave paradigm for tsunamis. J Geophys Res 113(C12012):22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mård Karlsson J, Skelton A, Sanden M, Ioualalen M, Kaewbanjak N, Pophet N, von Matern A (2009) Reconstructions of the coastal impact of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in the Khao Lak area, Thailand. J Geophys Res: Oceans 114(C10023):1–14Google Scholar
  31. Mulder T, Savoye B, Syvitsky JPM (1997) Numerical modeling of a mid-sized gravity flow: the 1979 Nice turbidity current (dynamics, processes, sediment budget and seafloor impact). Sedimentology 44:326–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Okada Y (1985) Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75(4):1135–1154Google Scholar
  33. Papadopoulos GA (2015) Tsunamis in the European-Mediterranean region: from historical record to risk mitigation. Elsevier, Amsterdam. ISBN 978-0-12-420224-5Google Scholar
  34. Piper DJ, Savoye B (1993) Processes of late quaternary turbidity current flow and deposition on the Var deep-sea fan, north-west Mediterranean Sea. Sedimentology 40(3):557–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schambach L, Grilli ST, Kirby JT, Shi F (2018) Landslide tsunami hazard along the upper US East Coast: effects of slide rheology, bottom friction, and frequency dispersion. Pure Appl Geophys. Published online 03 Sept 2018
  36. Shelby M, Grilli ST, Grilli AR (2016) Tsunami hazard assessment in the Hudson River Estuary based on dynamic tsunami tide simulations. Pure Appl Geophys 173(12):3999-4037. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shi F, Kirby JT, Harris JC, Grilli ST (2012) A high order adaptive time-stepping TVD for Boussinesq modeling of breaking waves and coastal inundation. Ocean Model 43:36–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tappin DR, Watts P, Grilli ST (2008) The Papua Neaw Guinea tsunami of 17 July 1998: anatomy of catastrophic event. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8(2):243–266.
  39. Tappin DR, Grilli ST, Harris JC, Geller RJ, Masterlark T, Kirby JT, Shi F (2014) Did a submarine landslide contribute to the 2011 Tohoku tsunami? Mar Geol 357:344–361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taramelli T, Mercalli G (1888) Il terremoto ligure del 23 febbraio 1887. Annali dell’Ufficio Centrale Meteorologico e Geodinamico Italiano, II 8(4):331–626Google Scholar
  41. Tehranirad B, Shi F, Kirby JT, Harris JC, Grilli ST (2011) Tsunami benchmark results for fully nonlinear Boussinesq wave model FUNWAVE-TVD. Version 1.0. Technical report, No. CACR-11-02, Center for Applied Coastal Research, University of DelawareGoogle Scholar
  42. Tehranirad B, Harris JC, Grilli AR, Grilli ST, Abadie S, Kirby JT, Shi F (2015) Far-field tsunami impact in the north Atlantic basin from large scale flank collapses of the Cumbre Vieja volcano, La Palma. Pure appl Geophys 172(12):3589–3616. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tinti S, Maramai A, Graziani L (2004) The new catalogue of Italian tsunami. Nat Hazards 33:439–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watts P, Grilli ST, Kirby JT, Fryer GJ, Tappin DR (2003) Landslide tsunami case studies using Boussinesq model and a fully nonlinear tsunami generation model. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wei G, Kirby JT (1995) A time-dependent numerical code for extended Boussinesq equations. J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng 121:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wei G, Kirby JT, Grilli ST, Subramanya R (1995) A fully nonlinear Boussinesq model for surface waves. Part 1. Highly nonlinear unsteady waves. J Fluid Mech 294:71–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002Google Scholar
  48. Wilson R, Dengler L, Borrero J, Synolakis C, Jaffe B, Barberopoulou A, Ewing L, Legg M, Ritchie A, Lynett P, Admire A, McCrink T, Falls J, Rosinski A, Treiman J, Manson M, Silva M, Davenport C, Lancaster J, Olson B, Pridmore C, Real C, Miller K, Goltz J (2011) The effects of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami on the California coastline. Seismol Res Lett 82(3):459–460Google Scholar
  49. Wilson R, Davenport C, Jaffe B (2012) Sediment scour and deposition within harbors in California (USA), caused by the March 11, 2011 Tohoku-oki Tsunami. Sed Geol 282:228–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson RI, Admire AR, Borrero JC, Dengler LA, Legg MR, Lynett P, Mc Crink TP, Miller KM, Ritchie A, Sterling K, Whitmore PM (2013) Observations and Impacts from the 2010 Chilean and 2011 Japanese Tsunamis in California (USA). Pure appl Geophys 170(6–8):1127–1147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatemeh Nemati
    • 1
  • Stephan T. Grilli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mansour Ioualalen
    • 2
  • Laurie Boschetti
    • 2
  • Christophe Larroque
    • 2
  • Jenny Trevisan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ocean Engineering, Graduate School of OceanographyUniversity of Rhode IslandNarragansettUSA
  2. 2.Université Côte d’Azur, IRD, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Géoazur, Campus CNRS AzurSophia Antipolis CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations