Advertisement

Carbon emissions accounting for China’s coal mining sector: invisible sources of climate change

  • Bing Wang
  • Chao-Qun Cui
  • Yi-Xin Zhao
  • Bo Yang
  • Qing-Zhou Yang
Original Paper

Abstract

Coal is the primary source of China’s carbon emissions due to the energy structure and its resource endowment. This reality creates enormous pressure and impetus for low-carbon pathways of coal production and consumption. Based on a literature review on carbon emissions accounting methods, this paper builds a source-driven CO2 emissions accounting model for the coal development sector using the emissions factor method. Scenario analysis is employed to predict future carbon emission equivalents and to indicate possible implications for climate change mitigation in this sector. Carbon emissions from coal development are mainly derived from coal mine gas emissions, which yield 62% of the sector’s total carbon emissions, followed by energy consumption. The recent decline in coal mining-driven CO2 emissions is mainly due to the strict deployment of coal mine gas and the changing structure of coal mines. The results from the scenarios suggest that the carbon emissions reduction potential will largely be determined by technology innovation in the coal mine gas industry. Policy implications for further addressing carbon emissions from the supply side of the coal industry include improvements in energy efficiency and coal mine gas extraction and utilization.

Keywords

Mining sector Carbon emissions accounting Coal development Emissions factor Coal mine gas 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71704178), Beijing Municipal Excellent Talents Foundation (No. 2017000020124G133), Yue Qi Distinguished Scholar Project of China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), National Statistical Science Research Project by National Bureau of Statistics of China (No. 2017LY10), and Major Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering (Nos. 2016-ZD-07, 2017-ZD-03). We also greatly appreciate the comments from the seminar participants in workshop organized by Chinese Academy of Engineering.

Supplementary material

11069_2018_3526_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 15 kb)

References

  1. Bastianoni S, Marchi M, Caro D et al (2014) The connection between 2006 IPCC GHG inventory methodology and ISO 14064-1 certification standard—a reference point for the environmental policies at sub-national scale. Environ Sci Policy 44:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth P, Brown H, Nemcik J, Ting R (2017) Spatial context in the calculation of gas emissions for underground coal mines. Int J Min Sci Technol 27:787–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen W, Wu Z, He J et al (2007) Carbon emission control strategies for China: a comparative study with partial and general equilibrium versions of the China MARKAL model. Energy 32:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng HM, Liang QM (2017) Assessing the synergistic reduction effects of different energy environmental taxes: the case of China. Nat Hazards 85(2):811–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fan JL, Liao H, Liang QM et al (2013) Residential carbon emission evolutions in urban-rural divided China: an end-use and behavior analysis. Appl Energy 101:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franzen A, Mader S (2018) Consumption-based versus production-based accounting of CO2 emissions: Is there evidence for carbon leakage? Environ Sci Policy 84:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goglio P, Smith WN, Grant BB et al (2018) A comparison of methods to quantify greenhouse gas emissions of cropping systems in LCA. J Clean Prod 172:4010–4017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang L, Krigsvoll G, Johansen F et al (2018) Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1906–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, HayamaGoogle Scholar
  10. Ji Z, Chen Z, Pan J, Niu Q (2017) A novel method for estimating methane emissions from underground coal mines: the Yanma coal mine, China. Atmos Environ 170:96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jin K, Cheng Y, Wang W et al (2016) Evaluation of the remote lower protective seam mining for coal mine gas control: a typical case study from the Zhuxianzhuang Coal Mine, Huaibei Coalfield, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalt G, Höher M, Lauk C et al (2016) Carbon accounting of material substitution with biomass: case studies for Austria investigated with IPCC default and alternative approaches. Environ Sci Policy 64:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kjendseth M, Mamo S, Kristjansdottir T, Andresen I (2018) Energy and buildings lessons learnt from embodied GHG emission calculations in zero emission buildings (ZEBs) from the Norwegian ZEB research center. Energy Build 165:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee CT, Lim JS, Fan YV et al (2018) Enabling low-carbon emissions for sustainable development in Asia and beyond. J Clean Prod 176:726–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu Z (2016) China’s carbon emissions report 2016. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu D, Xiao B (2018) Can China achieve its carbon emission peaking? A scenario analysis based on STIRPAT and system dynamics model. Ecol Indic 93:647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma M, Yan R, Cai W (2017) An extended STIRPAT model-based methodology for evaluating the driving forces affecting carbon emissions in existing public building sector: evidence from China in 2000–2015. Nat Hazards 89:741–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Madzivire G, Maleka RM, Tekere M, Petrik LF (2017) Cradle to cradle solution to problematic waste materials from mine and coal power station: acid mine drainage, coal fly ash and carbon dioxide. J Water Process Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meng M, Niu D (2011) Modeling CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion using the logistic equation. Energy 36:3355–3359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mi ZF, Zheng J, Meng J et al (2018a) China’s energy consumption in the new normal. Earth’s Future 6(7):1007–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mi ZF, Meng J, Green F et al (2018b) China’s “exported carbon” peak: patterns, drivers and implications. Geophys Res Lett 45(9):4309–4318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NBSC (2017a) China energy statistical yearbook 2017. China Statistics Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  23. NBSC (2017b) China statistical yearbook 2017. China Statistics Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  24. NDRC (2013) Notice of issue the first ten industries accounting and reporting guidelines of GHG emissions (Trial) by National Development and Reform Commission. 15 Oct 2013. http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201311/t20131101_565313.html
  25. NDRC (2016) Control to Chinese greenhouse gas emission in 13th five-year period. 7 Nov 2016. http://zwdt.ndrc.gov.cn/fwdt/fwdttzgg/201611/t20161107_825814.html
  26. Pan W, Pan W, Shi Y et al (2018) China’s inter-regional carbon emissions: an input–output analysis under considering national economic strategy. J Clean Prod 197:794–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schueler M, Hansen S, Marten H (2018) Discrimination of milk carbon footprints from different dairy farms when using IPCC Tier 1 methodology for calculation of GHG emissions from managed soils. J Clean Prod 177:899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shan Y, Guan D, Liu J et al (2017) Methodology and applications of city level CO2 emission accounts in China. J Clean Prod 161:1215–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sim J (2018) A carbon emission evaluation model for a container terminal. J Clean Prod 186:526–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun C, Ding D, Yang M (2017) Estimating the complete CO2 emissions and the carbon intensity in India: from the carbon transfer perspective. Energy Policy 109:418–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsai MS, Chang SL (2015) Taiwan’s 2050 low carbon development roadmap: an evaluation with the MARKAL model. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:178–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang N, Wen Z, Zhu T (2015) An estimation of regional emission intensity of coal mine methane based on coefficient-intensity factor methodology using China as a case study. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 5:437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang B, Cui C, Zhao Y, Chen M, Yuan XC (2018a) Climate change mitigation in the coal mining industry: low-carbon pathways and mine safety indicators. Nat Hazards.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3438-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang Z, Li Y, Cai H, Wang B (2018b) Comparative analysis of regional carbon emissions accounting methods in China: production-based versus consumption-based principles. J Clean Prod 194:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang T, Pan Y, Yang Y et al (2017) CO2 emissions in China’s building sector through 2050: a scenario analysis based on a bottom-up model. Energy 128:208–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yin L, Liu G, Zhou J et al (2017) A calculation method for CO2 emission in utility boilers based on BP neural network and carbon balance. Energy Proc 105:3173–3178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yuan L (2018) Strategies of high efficiency recovery and energy saving for coal resources in China. J China Univ Min Technol (social science) 1:3–12Google Scholar
  38. Zhu T, Bian W, Zhang S et al (2018) An improved approach to estimate methane emissions from coal mining in China. Environ Sci Technol 51:12072–12080CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory for Precise Mining of Intergrown Energy and ResourcesChina University of Mining and Technology (Beijing)BeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Resources and Safety EngineeringChina University of Mining and Technology (Beijing)BeijingChina
  3. 3.School of ManagementChina University of Mining and Technology (Beijing)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations